espEconomy: strategy and practiceEconomy: strategy and practice1997-99672663-550XИнститут экономики10.51176/1997-9967-2023-2-74-93esp-1057Research ArticleИННОВАЦИИ, ИННОВАЦИОННО-ТЕХНОЛОГИЧЕСКОЕ РАЗВИТИЕ, ЦИФРОВИЗАЦИЯINNOVATION, INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT, DIGITALIZATIONМногофакторная модель эмпирического анализа инновационного развития регионов КазахстанаMultifactor Model of Empirical Analysis of Innovative Development of Kazakhstan’s Regionshttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3937-6940КурмановН. А.KurmanovN. A.

Курманов Н.А. – PhD, профессор

ул. Сатпаева 2, 010008, Астана

Nurlan A. Kurmanov – PhD, Professor

2 Satpayev Str., 010008, Astana

kurmanov_na@enu.kzhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6152-2457УскеленоваА. Т.UskelenovaA. T.

Ускеленова А.Т. – д.э.н.

пр. ал-Фараби 71, 050040, Алматы

Assel T. Uskelenova – Dr. Sc. (Econ.)

71 al-Farabi Ave., 010040, Almaty

assol_74_leo@mail.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0215-1502КабдуллинаГ. К.KabdullinaG. K.

Кабдуллина Г.К. – д.э.н., профессор

ул. Кобыланды Батыр 27, 110000, Костанай

Gulmira K. Kabdullina – Dr. Sc. (Econ.), Professor

27 Kobylandy Batyr Str., 110000, Kostanay

asilhan1996@mail.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0128-3052МухияеваД. М.MukhiyayevaD. M.

Мухияева Д.М. – PhD

ул. Сатпаева 2, 010008, Астана

Dinara M. Mukhiyayeva – PhD, L.N.

2 Satpayev Str., 010008, Astana

dinara_muhiyaeva@mail.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9260-2401УтарбаеваГ. К.UtarbayevaG. K.

Утарбаева Г.К. – к.э.н., доцент

ул. Дукенулы 29, 010000, Астана

Gulnara K. Utarbayeva – Cand. Sc. (Econ.), Associate Professor

29 Dukenuly Str., 010000, Astana

utartigr@mail.ruЕвразийский национальный университет им. Л.Н. ГумилеваКазахстанL.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National UniversityKazakhstanКазахский национальный университет им. аль - ФарабиКазахстанAl-Farabi Kazakh National UniversityKazakhstanКостанайский социально-технический университет им. академика З. АлдамжарКазахстанKostanay Social and Technical University named after academician Z. AldamzharKazakhstanУниверситет Туран-АстанаКазахстанTuran-Astana UniversityKazakhstan2023300620231827493Copyright © Курманов Н.А., Ускеленова А.Т., Кабдуллина Г.К., Мухияева Д.М., Утарбаева Г.К., 20232023Курманов Н.А., Ускеленова А.Т., Кабдуллина Г.К., Мухияева Д.М., Утарбаева Г.К.Kurmanov N.A., Uskelenova A.T., Kabdullina G.K., Mukhiyayeva D.M., Utarbayeva G.K.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://esp.ieconom.kz/jour/article/view/1057

В статье раскрываются прикладные аспекты проведения многофакторного анализа, позволяющего выявить закономерности инновационного развития сырьевых (нефть и газ) регионов Казахстана во взаимосвязи с модернизационными преобразованиями. Проводится факторный анализ исходных признаков показателей за период с 2008 по 2021 год. Все данные проанализированы в программном обеспечении IBM SPSS 23. Авторы подробно описывают методологию данного исследования с предоставлением результатов статистического анализа. В результате проведенного анализа выявлены факторы: «экономическое развитие региона и агломерационные эффекты», «рыночный потенциал и инфраструктура», «структурный фактор инновационного развития», «человеческий фактор инновационного развития» и «инвестиционный фактор инновационного развития». Делается вывод, что стимулирование инновационной деятельности могло бы опираться на такие меры государственной политики, как увеличение инвестиций в основной капитал; рост валового регионального продукта и затрат на продуктовые и процессные инновации; развитие в регионах информационно-коммуникационных технологий; расширение программ обучения в течение жизни; снижение уровня бедности; увеличение доли работников, занятых исследованиями и разработками; развитие малого бизнеса; повышение инвестиций в образование и увеличение числа студентов по техническим и STEM-специальностям. Полученные результаты позволили сделать также вывод о полноте выявленных факторов инновационного развития сырьевых (нефть и газ) регионов Казахстана и необходимости проведения дальнейших исследований в контексте изучения заявленной проблемы.

The article reveals the applied aspects of conducting a multivariate analysis, which makes it possible to identify the patterns of innovative development of raw materials (oil and gas) regions of Kazakhstan in conjunction with modernization transformations. A factor analysis of the initial signs of indicators for the period from 2008 to 2021 is carried out. All data were analyzed using IBM SPSS 23 software. The authors describe in detail the methodology of this study, providing the results of statistical analysis. As a result of the analysis, the factors are identified: «economic development of the region and agglomeration effects», «market potential and infrastructure», «structural factor of innovative development», «human factor of innovative development» and «investment factor of innovative development». It is concluded that the stimulation of innovation activity could be based on such measures of state policy as an increase in investment in fixed assets; growth of the gross regional product and the cost of product and process innovations; development of information and communication technologies in the regions; expanding lifelong learning programs; poverty reduction; an increase in the share of employees engaged in research and development; small business development; increasing investment in education and increasing the number of students in technical and STEM specialties. The results obtained also made it possible to conclude that the identified factors of innovative development of raw materials (oil and gas) regions of Kazakhstan are complete and that further research is needed in the context of studying the stated problem. 

экономикастратегиярегионы«ресурсное проклятие»инновационное развитиефакторный анализEconomyStrategyRegions«Resource Curse»Innovative DevelopmentFactor Analysisстатья подготовлена в рамках проекта грантового финансирования Министерства науки и высшего образования Республики Казахстан «Оценка и развитие механизмов стимулирования инновационной деятельности предприятий обрабатывающей промышленности в Казахстане на основе методологии форсайта и технологического дорожного картирования» (ИРН AP09058009)this research article has been supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan within the project “Assessment and development of mechanisms for stimulating innovation activities of Kazakhstan’s manufacturing enterprises based on the foresight and technological roadmapping methodology” (IRN AP09058009)ReferencesAbad-Segura, E., & González-Zamar, M. D. (2019). Effects of financial education and financial literacy on creative entrepreneurship: A worldwide research. Education Sciences, 9(3), 238. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9030238Abad-Segura, E., & González-Zamar, M. D. (2019). Effects of financial education and financial literacy on creative entrepreneurship: A worldwide research. Education Sciences, 9(3), 238. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9030238Agency for Strategic Planning and Reforms of the Republic of Kazakhstan Bureau of National Statistics – Statistical Collections (2021) [cited March 03, 2023]. Available at: http://www.stat.gov.kzAgency for Strategic Planning and Reforms of the Republic of Kazakhstan Bureau of National Statistics – Statistical Collections (2021) [cited March 03, 2023]. Available at: http://www.stat.gov.kzAudretsch, D. B., & Belitski, M. (2017). Entrepreneurial ecosystems in cities: establishing the framework conditions. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(5), 1030-1051. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9473-8Audretsch, D. B., & Belitski, M. (2017). Entrepreneurial ecosystems in cities: establishing the framework conditions. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(5), 1030-1051. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9473-8Audretsch, D. B., & Fritsch, M. (1994). The geography of firm births in Germany. Regional studies, 28(4), 359-365. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343409412331348326Audretsch, D. B., & Fritsch, M. (1994). The geography of firm births in Germany. Regional studies, 28(4), 359-365. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343409412331348326Audretsch, D. B., & Keilbach, M. (2004). Entrepreneurship and regional growth: an evolutionary interpretation. Journal of evolutionary economics, 14(5), 605-616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-004-0228-6Audretsch, D. B., & Keilbach, M. (2004). Entrepreneurship and regional growth: an evolutionary interpretation. Journal of evolutionary economics, 14(5), 605-616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-004-0228-6Bottazzi, L., & Peri, G. (2003). Innovation and spillovers in regions: Evidence from European patent data. European economic review, 47(4), 687-710. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(02)00307-0Bottazzi, L., & Peri, G. (2003). Innovation and spillovers in regions: Evidence from European patent data. European economic review, 47(4), 687-710. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(02)00307-0Chepurenko, A., Popovskaya, E., & Obraztsova, O. (2017). Cross-regional variations in the motivation of early-stage entrepreneurial activity in Russia: Determining factors. Entrepreneurship in transition economies: Diversity, trends, and perspectives, 315-342. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57342-7_18Chepurenko, A., Popovskaya, E., & Obraztsova, O. (2017). Cross-regional variations in the motivation of early-stage entrepreneurial activity in Russia: Determining factors. Entrepreneurship in transition economies: Diversity, trends, and perspectives, 315-342. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57342-7_18Crescenzi, R., & Jaax, A. (2017). Innovation in Russia: the territorial dimension. Economic geography, 93(1), 66-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2016.1208532Crescenzi, R., & Jaax, A. (2017). Innovation in Russia: the territorial dimension. Economic geography, 93(1), 66-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2016.1208532Egert, B., & Leonard, C. S. (2008). Dutch disease scare in Kazakhstan: Is it real? Open Economies Review, 19(2), 147-165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11079-007-9051-7Egert, B., & Leonard, C. S. (2008). Dutch disease scare in Kazakhstan: Is it real? Open Economies Review, 19(2), 147-165. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11079-007-9051-7Feldman, M. P., & Florida, R. (1994). The geographic sources of innovation: technological infrastructure and product innovation in the United States. Annals of the association of American Geographers, 84(2), 210-229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1994.tb01735.xFeldman, M. P., & Florida, R. (1994). The geographic sources of innovation: technological infrastructure and product innovation in the United States. Annals of the association of American Geographers, 84(2), 210-229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1994.tb01735.xFritsch, M., & Storey, D. J. (2014). Entrepreneurship in a regional context: Historical roots, recent developments and future challenges. Regional studies, 48(6), 939-954. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.892574Fritsch, M., & Storey, D. J. (2014). Entrepreneurship in a regional context: Historical roots, recent developments and future challenges. Regional studies, 48(6), 939-954. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.892574Fritsch, M., & Wyrwich, M. (2018). Regional knowledge, entrepreneurial culture, and innovative start-ups over time and space―an empirical investigation. Small Business Economics, 51(2), 337-353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0016-6Fritsch, M., & Wyrwich, M. (2018). Regional knowledge, entrepreneurial culture, and innovative start-ups over time and space―an empirical investigation. Small Business Economics, 51(2), 337- 353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0016-6Jaffe, A. B. (1989). Real effects of academic research. The American economic review, 957-970.Jaffe, A. B. (1989). Real effects of academic research. The American economic review, 957-970.Kurmanov, N., Zhagalbayev, B., Feng, W., Seitzhanov, S., Rakhimbekova, A., & Aliyev, U. (2022). Medium and High-Tech Enterprises of Kazakhstan: Factors of Organization and Development of Innovation. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 18(3), 7-22. https://doi.org/10.14254/1800-5845/2022.18-3.1Kurmanov, N., Zhagalbayev, B., Feng, W., Seitzhanov, S., Rakhimbekova, A., & Aliyev, U. (2022). Medium and High-Tech Enterprises of Kazakhstan: Factors of Organization and Development of Innovation. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 18(3), 7-22. https://doi.org/10.14254/1800-5845/2022.18-3.1Lee, S. Y., Florida, R., & Acs, Z. (2004). Creativity and entrepreneurship: A regional analysis of new firm formation. Regional studies, 38(8), 879-891. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340042000280910Lee, S. Y., Florida, R., & Acs, Z. (2004). Creativity and entrepreneurship: A regional analysis of new firm formation. Regional studies, 38(8), 879- 891. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340042000280910Ó hUallacháin, B., & Leslie, T. F. (2007). Rethinking the regional knowledge production function. Journal of Economic Geography, 7(6), 737-752. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbm027Ó hUallacháin, B., & Leslie, T. F. (2007). Rethinking the regional knowledge production function. Journal of Economic Geography, 7(6), 737- 752. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbm027Plummer, L. A. (2010). Spatial dependence in entrepreneurship research: Challenges and methods. Organizational Research Methods, 13(1), 146-175. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428109334199Plummer, L. A. (2010). Spatial dependence in entrepreneurship research: Challenges and methods. Organizational Research Methods, 13(1), 146-175. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428109334199Reynolds, P., Storey, D. J., & Westhead, P. (1994). Cross-national comparisons of the variation in new firm formation rates. Regional studies, 28(4), 443-456. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343409412331348386Reynolds, P., Storey, D. J., & Westhead, P. (1994). Cross-national comparisons of the variation in new firm formation rates. Regional studies, 28(4), 443-456. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343409412331348386Zemtsov, S., Chepurenko, A., & Mikhailov, A. (2021). Pandemic Challenges for the Technological Startups in the Russian Regions. Foresight and STI Governance, 15(4), 61-77. https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2021.4.61.77Zemtsov, S., Chepurenko, A., & Mikhailov, A. (2021). Pandemic Challenges for the Technological Startups in the Russian Regions. Foresight and STI Governance, 15(4), 61-77. https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2021.4.61.77Zemtsov, S., Muradov, A., Wade, I., & Barinova, V. (2016). Determinants of Regional Innovation in Russia: Are People or Capital More Important? Foresight and STI Governance, 10 (2), 29-42. https://doi.org/10.17323/1995-459X.2016.2.29.42Zemtsov, S., Muradov, A., Wade, I., & Barinova, V. (2016). Determinants of Regional Innovation in Russia: Are People or Capital More Important? Foresight and STI Governance, 10 (2), 29- 42. https://doi.org/10.17323/1995-459X.2016.2.29.42

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.