espEconomy: strategy and practiceEconomy: strategy and practice1997-99672663-550XИнститут экономики10.51176/1997-9967-2023-4-109-126esp-1182Research ArticleРЕГИОНАЛЬНАЯ ЭКОНОМИКА И ТЕРРИТОРИАЛЬНОЕ РАЗВИТИЕREGIONAL ECONOMY AND TERRITORIAL DEVELOPMENTМетоды и практика оценки уровня инклюзивного регионального развития КазахстанаMethods and Practice of Assessing the Level of Inclusive Regional Development of Kazakhstanhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4210-3783НурлановаН. К.NurlanovaN. K.

д.э.н., профессор, главный научный сотрудник

ул. Шевченко 29, A25K1B0, Алматы

Nailya K. Nurlanova – Doc. Sc. (Econ.), Professor, Project Scientific Supervisor

29 Shevchenko str., A25K1B0, Almaty

nurlanova.nailya@ieconom.kzhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7451-7470АльжановаФ. Г.AlzhanovaF. G.

д.э.н., главный научный сотрудник

ул. Шевченко 29, A25K1B0, Алматы

Farida G. Alzhanova – Doc. Sc. (Econ.), Associate Professor, Chief Researcher

29 Shevchenko str., A25K1B0, Almaty

farida.alzhanova@gmail.comhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2196-0441ДнишевФ. М.DnishevF. M.

д.э.н., профессор, главный научный сотрудник

ул. Шевченко 29, A25K1B0, Алматы

Farkhat M. Dnishev – Doc. Sc. (Econ.), Professor, Chief Researcher

29 Shevchenko str., A25K1B0, Almaty

dfm0704@gmail.comИнститут экономики КН МНВО РККазахстанInstitute of Economics CS MSHE RKKazakhstan202319012024184109126Copyright © Нурланова Н.К., Альжанова Ф.Г., Днишев Ф.М., 20242024Нурланова Н.К., Альжанова Ф.Г., Днишев Ф.М.Nurlanova N.K., Alzhanova F.G., Dnishev F.M.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://esp.ieconom.kz/jour/article/view/1182

В последние годы в Казахстане усилилось неравенство экономического, социального, инновационного развития регионов и населения. Цель данной работы – оценить уровень различий между регионами Казахстана в сфере социальной, экономической, инновационной и инфраструктурной инклюзивности и предложить рекомендации по снижению регионального неравенства. Использованы методы сравнительного анализа, экономико-статистический, обобщений, индексный, матричный, типологии, абсолютные и относительные показатели инклюзивности. Применен авторский методический подход, основанный на индексном методе и ранжировании. Гипотеза исследования состоит в том, что высокий уровень экономического неравенства регионов определяет высокий уровень различий в сфере социальной инклюзии, инклюзии в сфере инфраструктуры и инноваций. Расчеты частных и интегральных индексов показали, что по социальной инклюзивности различия регионов составили 3,37 раз; экономической инклюзивности – 7,45; инфраструктурной – 2,96; инновационной – 6,67. На основе градации оценок сформирована матрица регионального инклюзивного развития. Сделан вывод о противоречивой картине в уровнях инклюзивности экономического, социального и инновационного развития регионов Казахстана. Предложенная методология может быть расширена и оптимизирована под регионы, группы населения, конкретные задачи в области инклюзивного развития. Разработаны рекомендации по совершенствованию региональной политики Казахстана, реформированию налоговой системы, повышению бюджетной самообеспеченности регионов в интересах инклюзивного развития.

In Kazakhstan, the inequality of economic, social, and innovative development of regions and the population has increased in recent years. The purpose of this work is to assess the level of differences between Kazakhstan’s regions in social, economic, innovative and infrastructural inclusivity and to offer recommendations for reducing regional inequality. The methods of comparative analysis, economic and statistical, generalizations, index, matrix, typology, absolute and relative indicators of inclusiveness are used. The author’s methodological approach is applied based on the index method and ranking. The study hypothesis is that the high level of economic inequality in the regions determines the high level of differences in the sphere of social inclusion, innovation and inclusion in the sphere of infrastructure. Calculations of private and integral indices showed that the differences in social inclusivity of the regions amounted to 3.37 times; economic inclusivity – 7.45; infrastructure – 2.96; innovation – 6.67. A matrix of regional inclusive development has been formed based on the gradation of assessments. The conclusion is made about the contradictory picture in the levels of inclusiveness of economic, social and innovative development of the regions of Kazakhstan. The proposed methodology can be expanded and optimized for regions, population groups, and specific tasks in the field of inclusive growth. Recommendations have been developed to improve Kazakhstan’s regional policy, reform the tax system, and increase the budget self-sufficiency of regions in the interests of inclusive development.

регионрегиональная экономикарегиональное неравенстворегиональная политикаинклюзивное развитиесоциальные инклюзииRegionRegional EconomyRegional InequalityRegional PolicyInclusive DevelopmentSocial InclusionИсследование профинансировано Комитетом науки Министерства науки и высшего образования Республики Казахстан (грант № AP09259004 «Приоритеты и механизмы инклюзивного регионального развития Казахстана в условиях преодоления экономического спада»).This study funded by the Science Committee of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan (grant No. AP09259004 “Priorities and mechanisms of inclusive regional development of Kazakhstan in the context of overcoming the economic recession”).ReferencesMcKinley, T. (2010). Inclusive Growth Criteria and Indicators: An Inclusive Growth Index for Diagnosis of Country Progress. ADB Sustainable Development Working Paper Series No. 14. [cited October 14, 2023]. Available at: https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/28493/adb-wp14-inclusive-growth-criteria.pdfMcKinley, T. (2010). Inclusive Growth Criteria and Indicators: An Inclusive Growth Index for Diagnosis of Country Progress. ADB Sustainable Development Working Paper Series No. 14. [cited October 14, 2023]. Available at: https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/28493/adb-wp14-inclusive-growth-criteria.pdfAlieva, S., & Kovyazina, K. (2022). Index of inequality of access to high-quality secondary education. Soros Foundation-Kazakhstan. [cited October 14, 2023]. Available at: https://www.soros.kz/ru/index-of-inequality-in-access-to-quality-vtorichnoe-education_studyAlieva, S., & Kovyazina, K. (2022). Index of inequality of access to high-quality secondary education. Soros Foundation-Kazakhstan. [cited October 14, 2023]. Available at: https://www.soros.kz/ru/index-of-inequality-in-access-to-quality-vtorichnoe-education_studyBard , A., & Soderqvist, J. (2002). Netocracy: The New Power Elite and Life After Capitalism. London, UK: Financial Times Prentice Hall.Bard , A., & Soderqvist, J. (2002). Netocracy: The New Power Elite and Life After Capitalism. London, UK: Financial Times Prentice Hall.Center for Inclusive Growth (2020). Methodology. Data-driven insights to measure and track inclusive growth. [cited October 14, 2023]. Available at: https://inclusivegrowthscore.com/Center for Inclusive Growth (2020). Methodology. Data-driven insights to measure and track inclusive growth. [cited October 14, 2023]. Available at: https://inclusivegrowthscore.com/EEC & UNCTAD (2019). Inclusive growth of the Eurasian Economic Union Member States: assessments and opportunities. [cited October 14, 2023]. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Steve-Macfeely/publicationEEC & UNCTAD (2019). Inclusive growth of the Eurasian Economic Union Member States: assessments and opportunities. [cited October 14, 2023]. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Steve-Macfeely/publicationEtherington, D., & Jones, M. (2004). Beyond Contradictions of the Workfare State? Denmark, Welfare-through-Work, and the Promise of Job Rotation. Environment and Planning C Government and Policy, 22(1), 129-148. https://doi.org/10.1068/c28mEtherington, D., & Jones, M. (2004). Beyond Contradictions of the Workfare State? Denmark, Welfare-through-Work, and the Promise of Job Rotation. Environment and Planning C Government and Policy, 22(1), 129-148. https://doi.org/10.1068/c28mEU. (2020). Multidimensional Inequality Monitoring Framework. [cited October 14, 2023]. Available at: https://composite-indicators.jrc.ec.europa.eu/multidimensional-inequalityEU. (2020). Multidimensional Inequality Monitoring Framework. [cited October 14, 2023]. Available at: https://composite-indicators.jrc.ec.europa.eu/multidimensional-inequalityForbes Kazakhstan (2019). Rating of competitiveness of Kazakhstan regions. Available at: https://forbes.kz/leader/reyting_konkurentosposobnosti_regionov_kazahstana_1/Forbes Kazakhstan (2019). Rating of competitiveness of Kazakhstan regions. Available at: https://forbes.kz/leader/reyting_konkurentosposobnosti_regionov_kazahstana_1/IMF (2013). Inclusive Growth: Measurement and Determinants. International Monetary Fund. [cited October 14, 2023]. Available at: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2013/wp13135.pdfIMF (2013). Inclusive Growth: Measurement and Determinants. International Monetary Fund. [cited October 14, 2023]. Available at: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2013/wp13135.pdfKhudajbergenov, O., & Idenov, S. (2022). Rating of regions of Kazakhstan, Center of strategic initiatives. [cited October 14, 2023]. Available at: http://csi.kz/page28950645.htmlKhudajbergenov, O., & Idenov, S. (2022). Rating of regions of Kazakhstan, Center of strategic initiatives. [cited October 14, 2023]. Available at: http://csi.kz/page28950645.htmlOECD (2009). Measuring Well-being and Progress: Well-being Research. [cited October 14, 2023]. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/wise/measuring-well-being-and-progress.htm#frameworkOECD (2009). Measuring Well-being and Progress: Well-being Research. [cited October 14, 2023]. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/wise/measuring-well-being-and-progress.htm#frameworkOECD (2014). Report on the OECD framework for inclusive growth. [cited October 14, 2023]. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/mcm/IG_MCM_ENG.pdfOECD (2014). Report on the OECD framework for inclusive growth. [cited October 14, 2023]. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/mcm/IG_MCM_ENG.pdfOsberg, L., & Sharpe, A. (2010). The Measurement of Economic Welfare. Challenge, 53(4), 25–42. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40722652Osberg, L., & Sharpe, A. (2010). The Measurement of Economic Welfare. Challenge, 53(4), 25–42. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40722652Pawluczuk, А., & Gamundani, А. (2021). Bridging the gender digital divide: an analysis of existing guidance for gender digital inclusion programs’ evaluations. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 23(3), 287-299. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-11-2020-0158Pawluczuk, А., & Gamundani, А. (2021). Bridging the gender digital divide: an analysis of existing guidance for gender digital inclusion programs’ evaluations. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 23(3), 287-299. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-11-2020-0158Ranieri, R., & Ramos, A. (2013). Inclusive growth: Building up a concept. Working Paper No.104. International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth. [cited October 14, 2023]. Available at: https://www.ipc-undp.org/pub/IPCWorkingPaper104.pdfRanieri, R., & Ramos, A. (2013). Inclusive growth: Building up a concept. Working Paper No.104. International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth. [cited October 14, 2023]. Available at: https://www.ipc-undp.org/pub/IPCWorkingPaper104.pdfSalzman, J. (2003). Methodological Choices Encountered in the Construction of Composite Indices of Economic and Social Well-Being. [cited October 14, 2023]. Available at: http://www.csls.ca/events/cea2003/salzman-typol-cea2003.pdfSalzman, J. (2003). Methodological Choices Encountered in the Construction of Composite Indices of Economic and Social Well-Being. [cited October 14, 2023]. Available at: http://www.csls.ca/events/cea2003/salzman-typol-cea2003.pdfSharafutdinov, R., Akhmetshin, E., Polyakova, A., Gerasimov, V., Shpakova, R., & Mikhailova, M. (2019). Inclusive Growth: A Dataset on Key and Institutional Foundations for Inclusive Development of Russian Regions. Data in Brief, 23, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2019.103864Sharafutdinov, R., Akhmetshin, E., Polyakova, A., Gerasimov, V., Shpakova, R., & Mikhailova, M. (2019). Inclusive Growth: A Dataset on Key and Institutional Foundations for Inclusive Development of Russian Regions. Data in Brief, 23, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2019.103864Shearer, R., & Berube, A. (2017). The surprisingly short list of U.S. metro areas achieving inclusive economic growth. Brookings. [cited October 14, 2023]. Available at: https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/metro-monitor_full_af2.pdfShearer, R., & Berube, A. (2017). The surprisingly short list of U.S. metro areas achieving inclusive economic growth. Brookings. [cited October 14, 2023]. Available at: https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/metro-monitor_full_af2.pdfShipton, D., & Sarica, S. (2021). Knowing the goal: an inclusive economy that can address the public health challenges of our time. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 75, 1129-1132. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2020-216070Shipton, D., & Sarica, S. (2021). Knowing the goal: an inclusive economy that can address the public health challenges of our time. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 75, 1129-1132. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2020-216070Tarko, V. (2020). Simple rules for a more inclusive economy. European Journal of Law and Economics, 52(2), 229-249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-020-09674-2Tarko, V. (2020). Simple rules for a more inclusive economy. European Journal of Law and Economics, 52(2), 229-249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-020-09674-2WEF (2017). The Inclusive Growth and Development Report. [cited October 14, 2023]. Available at: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Forum_IncGrwth_2017.pdfWEF (2017). The Inclusive Growth and Development Report. [cited October 14, 2023]. Available at: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Forum_IncGrwth_2017.pdfWEF (2018). Inclusive Growth and Development Report 2018. [cited October 14, 2023]. Available at: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Forum_Inc-Grwth_2018.pdfWEF (2018). Inclusive Growth and Development Report 2018. [cited October 14, 2023]. Available at: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Forum_Inc-Grwth_2018.pdfWorld Bank (2016). World Development Report 2016: Digital Dividends. [cited October 14, 2023]. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0671-1World Bank (2016). World Development Report 2016: Digital Dividends. [cited October 14, 2023]. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0671-1World Bank (2020a). Financial Inclusion, Europe and Central Asia Economic Report. [cited October 14, 2023]. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1409-9World Bank (2020a). Financial Inclusion, Europe and Central Asia Economic Report. [cited October 14, 2023]. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1409-9World Bank (2020b). Shared Prosperity: Monitoring Inclusive Growth. [cited October 14, 2023]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1602-4_ch2World Bank (2020b). Shared Prosperity: Monitoring Inclusive Growth. [cited October 14, 2023]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1602-4_ch2

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.