espEconomy: strategy and practiceEconomy: strategy and practice1997-99672663-550XИнститут экономики10.51176/1997-9967-2024-1-46-56esp-1234Research ArticleЭКОНОМИЧЕСКИЙ РОСТ И УСТОЙЧИВОЕ РАЗВИТИЕECONOMIC GROWTH AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENTУстойчивое экономическое развитие: теория институционального конструктивизмаSustainable Economic Development: Theory of Institutional ConstructivismНаумовЕ. А.NaumovE. A.

д.э.н., заместитель заведующего кафедрой экономической политики Государственного университета управления, академик Российской академии наук, вице-президент Международного Академия инноваций “ГЛОБЕЛИКС”

пр. Ленина, 32 А, Москва

Evgeny A. Naumov – Doc. Sc. (Econ.), Deputy Head of the Department of Economic Policy of the State University of Management, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vice-President of the International Academy of Innovation “GLOBELIKS”

32 A Lenin Ave., Moscow

hdne@mail.ruНаучный центр евразийской интеграцииРоссияScientific Center of Eurasian IntegrationRussian Federation2024050420241914656Copyright © Наумов Е.А., 20242024Наумов Е.А.Naumov E.A.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://esp.ieconom.kz/jour/article/view/1234

Данная работа посвящена формулировке проблемы устойчивого развития интеллектуальной экономики и применению теории конструктивизма в контексте решения задач институционального проектирования социально-экономических систем. Цель данной работы заключается в исследовании возможностей применения теории конструктивизма для решения проблем институционального проектирования в условиях устойчивого развития интеллектуальной экономики. Автор исходит из необходимости обоснованного подхода к действию, который создает основу для построения институциональной среды, источником которой является парадигма самоорганизации социально-экономических систем, лежащая в основе теории и практики радикального конструктивизма. Исследование демонстрирует связи между устойчивым развитием и теорией институционального конструктивизма, определяя важные цели, направления и стратегии. Осознавая текущие глобальные и национальные процессы, ключевой задачей является переход к инновационному типу развития. Данный переход требует значительных действий, которые включают пересмотр существующих подходов в сфере экономики и производства в пользу стратегий, основанных на новейших технологиях. Исследование ведется группой экспертов, включая исследователей, политических деятелей и специалистов на практике, которые специализируются на вопросах экономического прогресса, устойчивого развития и инноваций.

The paper is devoted to the formulation of the problem of sustainable development of the intellectual economy and the use of the theory of constructivism in relation to solving the problems of institutional design of socio-economic systems. The purpose of this work is to explore the possibilities of applying the theory of constructivism to solve the problems of institutional design in the context of sustainable development of the intellectual economy. The author of the work proceeds from the need for a reasonable approach to action, which creates the basis for constructing an institutional environment, the source of which is the paradigm of self-organization of socio-economic systems, which underlies the theory and practice of radical constructivism. The study shows the links between sustainable development and the theory of institutional constructivism by identifying important goals, directions, and strategies. Based on the awareness of current global and national processes, the key issue is the transition to an innovative type of development. This transition involves important steps that involve changing the focus from traditional approaches in economics and production to strategies based on advanced technologies. This research is conducted by researchers, policymakers, and practitioners dealing with economic development, sustainability, and innovation.

экономикаустойчивое развитиеинтеллектуальная экономикаэкономика основанная на знанияхтеория конструктивизмаинституциональный дизайнсоциальноэкономические системыEconomicsSustainable DevelopmentIntellectual EconomyKnowledge-Based EconomyTheory of ConstructivismInstitutional DesignSocio-Economic SystemsReferencesAkerlof, G. A., & Kranton, R. (2000). Economics and Identity. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 715-753. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355300554881Akerlof, G. A., & Kranton, R. (2000). Economics and Identity. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 715-753. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355300554881Barbier, E. B. (2011). The Policy Challenges for Green Economy and Sustainable Economic Development. Natural Resources Forum, 35, 233-245. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1477-8947.2011.01397.XBarbier, E. B. (2011). The Policy Challenges for Green Economy and Sustainable Economic Development. Natural Resources Forum, 35, 233-245. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1477-8947.2011.01397.XBilan, Y., Mishchuk, H., & Pylypchuk, R. (2017). Towards sustainable economic development via social entrepreneurship. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, 6, 691-702. https://doi.org/10.9770/JSSI.2017.6.4%2813%29Bilan, Y., Mishchuk, H., & Pylypchuk, R. (2017). Towards sustainable economic development via social entrepreneurship. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, 6, 691-702. https://doi.org/10.9770/JSSI.2017.6.4%2813%29Bolshakov, B. E. (2011). The science of sustainable development. Moscow, Russian Academy of Natural Sciences.Bolshakov, B. E. (2011). The science of sustainable development. Moscow, Russian Academy of Natural Sciences.ECD Work on Innovation. (2009). A Stocktaking of Existing Work. OECD Science, Technology and Industry working papers.ECD Work on Innovation. (2009). A Stocktaking of Existing Work. OECD Science, Technology and Industry working papers.Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 441-473. https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV.EN-ERGY.30.050504.144511Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 441-473. https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV.EN-ERGY.30.050504.144511Glazyev, S. Y., Sabden, O. S., Armensky, A. E., & Naumov, E. A. (2012). Intellectual economy – technological challenges of the XXI century. Almaty.Glazyev, S. Y., Sabden, O. S., Armensky, A. E., & Naumov, E. A. (2012). Intellectual economy – technological challenges of the XXI century. Almaty.Glasersfeld, E. von. Radical constructivism and Piaget’s concept of knowledge. – 1978.Glasersfeld, E. von. Radical constructivism and Piaget’s concept of knowledge. – 1978.Makarov, V. L. (2003). Economics of knowledge: lessons for Russia. Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 5, 5-24.Makarov, V. L. (2003). Economics of knowledge: lessons for Russia. Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 5, 5-24.North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional Change and Economic Performance. New York, Cambridge Press.North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional Change and Economic Performance. New York, Cambridge Press.Ostrom, E. (2008). Frameworks and theories of environmental change. Global Environmental Change-Human And Policy Dimensions, 18(2), 249-252.Ostrom, E. (2008). Frameworks and theories of environmental change. Global Environmental Change-Human And Policy Dimensions, 18(2), 249-252.Popov, V., & Vlasov, M. (2006). Mini-economic institutes of the production of new knowledge. Yekaterinburg, Institute of Economics, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences.Popov, V., & Vlasov, M. (2006). Mini-economic institutes of the production of new knowledge. Yekaterinburg, Institute of Economics, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences.Sachs, J. D. (2015). The Age of Sustainable Development. New York, Columbia University Press.Sachs, J. D. (2015). The Age of Sustainable Development. New York, Columbia University Press.Stiglitz, J., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J.-P. (2010). Mismeasuring our lives: Why GDP doesn’t add up. Perseus Books Group, New York, NY.Stiglitz, J., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J.-P. (2010). Mismeasuring our lives: Why GDP doesn’t add up. Perseus Books Group, New York, NY.Tonn, B. E. (2004). Research society: science and technology for the ages. Futures, 36, 335-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287%2803%2900153-8Tonn, B. E. (2004). Research society: science and technology for the ages. Futures, 36, 335-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287%2803%2900153-8

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.