espEconomy: strategy and practiceEconomy: strategy and practice1997-99672663-550XИнститут экономики10.51176/1997-9967-2024-4-133-145esp-1463Research ArticleГОСУДАРСТВЕННОЕ УПРАВЛЕНИЕPUBLIC ADMINISTRATIONУправление рисками в государственном секторе: библиографический обзор литературыRisk Management in the Public Sector: A Bibliographic Literature Reviewhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6352-8713ИбадильдинН. А.IbadildinN. A.

к.т.н., ассоциированный профессор, Школа Креативных Индустрий

пр. Мангилик Ел С1, Астана

Nurkhat A. Ibadildin – Cand. Sc. (Technic.), Associate Professor, School of Creative Industries

С1 Mangilik El ave., Astana

ibadildin.nurkhat@astanait.edu.kzhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8313-5415МаликА. А.MalikA. A.

бакалавр по образовательной программе IT Менеджмент

пр. Мангилик Ел С1, Астана

Anel A. Malik – Bachelor of Education in IT Management

С1 Mangilik El ave., Astana

anelekaatieva@gmail.comКенжинЖ. Б.KenzhinZ. B.

PhD, ассоциированный профессор

пр. Мәңгілік ел В2, бизнес-центр EXPO, блок В, Астана

Zhaxat B. Kenzhin – PhD, associate professor

B2 Mangilik el ave., EXPO business center, block В, Astana

jaksat_22@mail.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2451-4984МукинаГ. С.MukinaG. S.

PhD, ассоциированный профессор

ул. Ломова 64.,  Павлодар

Gulsara S. Mukina – PhD, Associate Professor

64 Lomova st., Pavlodar

gulsara.dyusembekova@mail.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1996-5342ШадиеваА. А.ShadiyevaA. A.

к.э.н., старший преподаватель

ул. Байтурсынова 80, Шымкент

Aigul A. Shadiyeva – Cand. Sc. (Econ.), senior lecturer

80 Baitursynov st., Shymkent

ms.shadieva@mail.ruAstana IT UniversityКазахстанAstana IT UniversityKazakhstanАкадемия физической культуры и массового спортаКазахстанAcademy of Physical Education and Mass SportKazakhstanУниверситет ТорайгыроваКазахстанToraighyrov UniversityKazakhstanЦентрально-Азиатский инновационный университетКазахстанCentral Asian Innovation UniversityKazakhstan202414012025194133145Copyright © Ибадильдин Н.А., Малик А.А., Кенжин Ж.Б., Мукина Г.С., Шадиева А.А., 20252025Ибадильдин Н.А., Малик А.А., Кенжин Ж.Б., Мукина Г.С., Шадиева А.А.Ibadildin N.A., Malik A.A., Kenzhin Z.B., Mukina G.S., Shadiyeva A.A.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://esp.ieconom.kz/jour/article/view/1463

В этом обзоре библиографической литературы рассматривается состояние управления рисками в государственном секторе с упором на его эволюцию, текущие тенденции и будущие направления. Цель исследования провести систематический синтез литературы, выделяя ключевые области, такие как управление рисками, устойчивость и управление чрезвычайными ситуациями. Методология включала сбор данных из основных академических источников, таких как Google Scholar, Web of Science и Scopus. Данные отбирались с использованием определённых ключевых слов, фильтров по рецензируемым статьям и временного диапазона с 2001 по 2024 годы, что обеспечило актуальность и высокое качество материалов. В обзоре подчеркивается растущая значимость управления рисками в государственном секторе, особенно в ответ на глобальные вызовы, такие как финансовые кризисы и пандемия COVID-19. К основным выявленным темам относятся управление рисками, устойчивость и управление чрезвычайными ситуациями. Несмотря на обширные исследования, сохраняются пробелы в интеграции передовых технологий, продольных исследований и сравнительных анализов в различных регионах. Данное исследование дает ценную информацию для политиков и практиков, подчеркивая необходимость инновационных и адаптивных стратегий управления рисками для повышения устойчивости государственного сектора. Будущие исследования могут быть направлены на устранение этих пробелов, способствуя повышению устойчивости государственных организаций и укреплению понимания динамики управления рисками в условиях возрастающей неопределенности.

This bibliographic literature review investigates the state of risk management in the public sector, focusing on its evolution, current trends, and future directions. The study aims to systematically synthesize the literature, identifying critical areas such as risk governance, resilience, and emergency management as central themes. The methodology involved retrieving data from primary academic sources like Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus. Data was curated using specific keywords, peer-reviewed filters, and a timeframe from 2001 to 2024, ensuring relevancy and high-quality outputs.  The review highlights the increasing significance of risk management in the public sector, particularly in response to global challenges such as financial crises and the COVID-19 pandemic. Results reveal an expanding focus on public sector risk management, driven by recent global challenges and the integration of digital technologies. However, notable research gaps persist, particularly in areas such as advanced technology adoption, longitudinal impact studies, and cross-regional comparative analyses. Despite extensive research, gaps remain in integrating advanced technologies, longitudinal studies, and comparative analyses across different regions. This study provides valuable insights for policymakers and practitioners, emphasizing the need for innovative and adaptive risk management strategies to enhance public sector resilience. Future research should address these gaps, promoting resilience in public sector organizations and contributing to a more robust understanding of risk management dynamics in an increasingly uncertain world.

управление рискамигосударственный секторбиблиометрический анализстратегиястратегия управленияуправление рискамипередовые технологииRisk ManagementPublic SectorBibliometric AnalysisStrategyManagement StrategyRisk ManagementAdvanced TechnologiesReferencesAlexander, D. (2002). Principles of emergency planning and management. Oxford University Press. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA74363638Alexander, D. (2002). Principles of emergency planning and management. Oxford University Press. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA74363638Aven, T. (2015). Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation. European Journal of Operational Research, 253(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.023Aven, T. (2015). Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation. European Journal of Operational Research, 253(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.023Boin, A., & McConnell, A. (2007). Preparing for critical infrastructure breakdowns: the limits of crisis management and the need for resilience. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 15(1), 50–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5973.2007.00504.xBoin, A., & McConnell, A. (2007). Preparing for critical infrastructure breakdowns: the limits of crisis management and the need for resilience. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 15(1), 50–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5973.2007.00504.xBroadus, R. N. (1987). Toward a definition of “bibliometrics”. Scientometrics, 12(5–6), 373–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02016680Broadus, R. N. (1987). Toward a definition of “bibliometrics”. Scientometrics, 12(5–6), 373–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02016680Comfort, L. K., Boin, A., & Demchak, C. C. (2010). Designing resilience: preparing for extreme events. University of Pittsburgh Press eBooks. https://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BB07157158Comfort, L. K., Boin, A., & Demchak, C. C. (2010). Designing resilience: preparing for extreme events. University of Pittsburgh Press eBooks. https://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BB07157158Drennan, L. T., Dudau, A., McConnell, A., & Stark, A. (2024). Risk and crisis management in the public sector. Taylor & Francis.Drennan, L. T., Dudau, A., McConnell, A., & Stark, A. (2024). Risk and crisis management in the public sector. Taylor & Francis.Hood, C. C., Rothstein, H., & Baldwin, R. (2004). The government of risk: Understanding Risk Regulation Regimes. Oxford University Press.Hood, C. C., Rothstein, H., & Baldwin, R. (2004). The government of risk: Understanding Risk Regulation Regimes. Oxford University Press.Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S., Read, S., & Combs, B. (1978). How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. Policy Sciences, 9(2), 127–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00143739Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S., Read, S., & Combs, B. (1978). How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. Policy Sciences, 9(2), 127–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00143739Fletcher, K. C., & Stanton, T. H. (2019). Public sector Enterprise Risk management: Advancing Beyond the Basics. Routledge.Fletcher, K. C., & Stanton, T. H. (2019). Public sector Enterprise Risk management: Advancing Beyond the Basics. Routledge.Kunreuther, H. (2002). Risk analysis and risk management in an uncertain world1. Risk Analysis, 22(4), 655–664. https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.00057Kunreuther, H. (2002). Risk analysis and risk management in an uncertain world1. Risk Analysis, 22(4), 655–664. https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.00057Larsson, A., & Teigland, R. (2019). Digital Transformation and Public Services (Open Access): Societal Impacts in Sweden and Beyond. Routledge.Larsson, A., & Teigland, R. (2019). Digital Transformation and Public Services (Open Access): Societal Impacts in Sweden and Beyond. Routledge.Newman, M. E. J. (2001). The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(2), 404–409. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.98.2.404Newman, M. E. J. (2001). The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(2), 404–409. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.98.2.404Power, M. (2004). The risk management of everything: rethinking the politics of uncertainty. http://www.demos.co.uk/files/riskmanagementofeverything.pdf?1240939425Power, M. (2004). The risk management of everything: rethinking the politics of uncertainty. http://www.demos.co.uk/files/riskmanagementofeverything.pdf?1240939425Renn, O. (2008). Risk Governance: Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA8627946XRenn, O. (2008). Risk Governance: Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA8627946XSlovic, P. (2016). The perception of risk. Routledge.Slovic, P. (2016). The perception of risk. Routledge.Small, H. (1973). Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406Small, H. (1973). Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.