espEconomy: strategy and practiceEconomy: strategy and practice1997-99672663-550XИнститут экономикиesp-163Research ArticleСтатьиИнституциональная поддержка социального предпринимательства: мировая практика и возможности для КазахстанаSocial entrepreneurship institutional support: world practice and opportunities Kazakhstanhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6306-3960ПритвороваТ. П.PritvorovaT. P.

д.э.н., профессор, профессор кафедры «Экономика и международный бизнес»

pritvorova_@mail.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7115-2007ГелашвилиН. Н.GelashviliN. N.

к.э.н, доцент, доцент кафедры «Экономика и международный бизнес»

denor1980@mail.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7226-3796СпановаБ. К.SpanovaB. K.

докторант

spanova.bagdat@bk.ruКарагандинский государственный университет им. Е.А.БукетоваКазахстанКарагандинский экономический университет КазпотребсоюзаКазахстан2020300320201517187Copyright © Притворова Т.П., Гелашвили Н.Н., Спанова Б.К., 20202020Притворова Т.П., Гелашвили Н.Н., Спанова Б.К.Pritvorova T.P., Gelashvili N.N., Spanova B.K.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://esp.ieconom.kz/jour/article/view/163

В статье рассматривается система институциональной поддержки социального предпринимательства в Казахстане в контексте мировых практик. Обобщив мировой опыт содействия социальному предпринимательству, авторы идентифицируют субъектов поддержки, определяют роль каждого субъекта и механизмы связи между ними. Учитывая тот факт, что в Казахстане нет официального определения социального предпринимательства, авторы исходят из рамочного определения для этого явления, сложившегося в мировой научной мысли и юридических нормах его регулирования. Используя это определение, авторы дают оценку масштабов социального предпринимательства в секторе неправительственных организаций на основе социологического исследования и имеющихся данных в открытых источниках. Исходя из сравнения с эффективными мировыми практиками в статье дается оценка нормативно-правовой базы и институциональной среды развития социального предпринимательства в Казахстане. Авторами разработаны рекомендации по нормативно-правовому статусу социальных предпринимателей и основным направлениям их институциональной поддержки. Особое внимание уделено развитию межсекторальных и внутрисекторальных связей в развитии социального предпринимательства. Акцент сделан на модели акселератора как наиболее продуктивной формы поддержки, имеющей сетевую природу и опирающtqся на механизмы координации действий государства и негосударственных акторов.

The article studies the system of social entrepreneurship institutional support in Kazakhstan in the context of effective world experience. By summarizing the world’s experience of promoting social entrepreneurship, the authors identify the subjects of support; determine the role of each subject and the mechanisms of communication between them. Taking into account the fact that there is no official definition of social entrepreneurship in Kazakhstan; the authors proceed from the framework definition for this phenomenon, which has been developed in the world scientific thought and legal norms of its regulation. Using this definition, the authors estimate the extent of social entrepreneurship in the NGO sector on the basis of sociological research and available data in open sources. Based on comparison with effective world practices, the article assesses the regulatory framework and institutional environment of social entrepreneurship development in Kazakhstan. The authors have developed recommendations on the regulatory status of social entrepreneurs and the main areas of their institutional support. Particular attention is paid to the development of cross-sectoral and intra-sectoral links in the development of social entrepreneurship. The emphasis is made on the accelerator models as the most productive form of support, which has a network nature and based on mechanisms for coordinating the actions of the state and non-state actors.

социальное предпринимательствоинституциональная среданегосударственные акторынормативно-правовой статусакселераторКазахстанsocial entrepreneurshipinstitutional environmentgovernmentnon-state actorsregulatory statusacceleratorKazakhstanReferencesМосковская А.А., Берендяев А.А., Москвина А.Ю. Между социальным и экономическим благом: конфликт проектов легитимации социального предпринимательства в России // Мониторинг общественного мнения: Экономические и социальные перемены. - 2017. - № 6. - С. 31-51. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2017.6.02Moskovskaja, A.A., Berendjaev, A.A., Moskvina, A.Ju. (2017). Mezhdu socialnym i ekonomicheskim blagom: konflikt proektov legitimacii socialnogo predprinimatelstva v Rossii. Monitoring obshhestvennogo mnenija: Ekonomicheskie i socialnye peremeny, 6, 31—51. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2017.6.02Dees J.G. A Tale of Two Cultures: Charity, Problem Solving, and the Future of Social Entrepreneurship // Journal of Business Ethics. – 2012. - 111(3). - P.321-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1412-5Dees, J.G. (2012). A Tale of Two Cultures: Charity, Problem Solving, and the Future of Social Entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(3), 321-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1412-5Martin R., Osberg S. Two keys to sustainable social enterprise. Harvard Business Review 2015 [Электронный ресурс] URL: http://oglethorpe.edu/wpcontent/uploads/2017/01/Two-Keys-to-SustainableSocial-Entreprise.pdf (дата обращения: 01.02.2020).Martin, R., Osberg, R. (2015). Two keys to sustainable social enterprise. Harvard Business Review. [Electronic source] URL: http://oglethorpe.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Two-Keys-toSustainable-Social-Entreprise.pdf (Date of access: 10.02.2020).Mair J., Marty I. Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight // Journal of World Business. – 2006. - 41(1). - P.36–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.09.002Mair, J., Marty I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.09.002Satar M.S., Natasha S. Individual social entrepreneurship orientation: towards development of a measurement scale // Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship. - 2019.- 13(1). - P.49-72. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJIE-09-2018-0052Satar, M.S., Natasha S. (2019). Individual social entrepreneurship orientation: towards development of a measurement scale. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 13(1), 49-72. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJIE-09-2018-0052Alter K. Social Enterprise Typology. - Washington: Virtue Venture LLC, 2006. – 115p.Alter, K. (2006). Social Enterprise Typology. Virtue Venture LLC.Boschee J. Eight Basic Principles for Nonprofit Entrepreneurs // Nonprofit World.- 2001. - Vol. 19, Is. 4. – P.15-18.Boschee, J. (2001). Eight Basic Principles for Nonprofit Entrepreneurs. Nonprofit World, 19(1), 15-18.Defourny J., Nyssens M. Conceptions of social enterprise and social entrepreneurship in Europe and the United States: Convergences and divergences // Journal of Social Entrepreneurship. – 2010. - 1(1). – P.32–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420670903442053Defourny, J., Nyssens M. (2010). Conceptions of social enterprise and social entrepreneurship in Europe and the United States: Convergences and divergences Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 32–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420670903442053Sullivan G., Weerawardena J., Carnegie K. Social entrepreneurship: towards conceptualisation. // International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing. - 2003. - 8(1). – P.76–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.202Sullivan, G., & Weerawardena J., Carnegie K. (2003). Social entrepreneurship: towards conceptualisation. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 8(1), 76–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.202Haugh H. New Strategies for a Sustainable Society: The Growing Contribution of Social Entrepreneurship // Business Ethics Quarterly. –2007. –17(4). – P.743–749. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq20071747Haugh, H. (2007). New Strategies for a Sustainable Society: The Growing Contribution of Social Entrepreneurship. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17(4), 743–749. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq20071747Dacin P., Dacin M., Matear M. Social entrepreneurship: Why we don’t need a new theory and how we move forward from here // Academy of Management Perspectives. -2010.- 24(3). – P.37–57. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.24.3.37s://doi.org/10.5465/amp.24.3.37Dacin, P., Dacin, M., Matear, M. (2010). Social entrepreneurship: Why we don’t need a new theory and how we move forward from here. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(3), 37–57. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.24.3.37Shaw E., Carter S. Social entrepreneurship: Theoretical antecedents and empirical analysis of entrepreneurial processes and outcomes.// Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development. -2007. - 14(3).- P.418–434. https://doi.org/10.1108/14626000710773529Shaw, entrepreneurship: E., Carter, Theoretical S. (2007). antecedents Social and empirical analysis of entrepreneurial processes and outcomes. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 14(3), 418–434. https://doi.org/10.1108/14626000710773529Peredo A. M., McLean M. Social entrepreneurship: A critical review of the concept // Journal of World Business. - 2006. - 41(1). – P.56–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.10.007Peredo, A. M., McLean, M. (2006). Social entrepreneurship: A critical review of the concept. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.10.007Grassl W. Business models of social enterprise: A design approach to hybridity // ACRN Journal of Entrepreneurship Perspectives. – 2012. 1(1). – P.37–60.Grassl, W. (2012). Business models of social enterprise: A design approach to hybridity. ACRN Journal of Entrepreneurship Perspectives, 1(1), 37–60.Hockerts K. How hybrid organizations turn antagonistic assets into complementarities // California Management Review. - 2015.- 57(3). - P. 83-106. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2015.57.3.83Hockerts, K. (2015). How hybrid organizations turn antagonistic assets into complementarities. California Management Review, 57(3), 83-106. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2015.57.3.83Raisiene A., Urmanaviciene A. Mission drift in a hybrid organization: how can social business combine its dual goals? // Ekonomski vjesnik/Econviews. – 2017. – 30(2). - P.301-310.Raisiene, A., Urmanaviciene, A. (2017). Mission drift in a hybrid organization: how can social business combine its dual goals? Ekonomski vjesnik/Econviews, 30(2), 301-310.Nicholls A. The legitimacy of social entrepreneurship: Reflexive isomorphism in a pre paradigmatic field // Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice. - 2010. - 34(4). – P.611–633. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00397.xNicholls, A. (2010). The legitimacy of social entrepreneurship: Reflexive isomorphism in a pre paradigmatic field. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 34(4), 611–633. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00397.xGalera G., Borzaga C. Social enterprise: An international overview of its conceptual evolution and legal implementation // Social Enterprise Journal.- 2009. - 5(3). - P.210–228. https://doi.org/10.1108/17508610911004313Galera, G., Borzaga, C. (2009). Social enterprise: An international overview of its conceptual evolution and legal implementation. Social Enterprise Journal, 5(3), 210–228. https://doi.org/10.1108/17508610911004313Гришина Я. Концептуальная модель правового обеспечения российского социального предпринимательства. – М.: Юрлитинформ, 2016. - 421 с.Grishina, Ja. S. (2016). Konceptualnaja model pravovogo obespechenija rossijskogo socialnogo predprinimatelstva. Moscow: Jurlitinform, 421.Defourny J., Nyssens M. Mapping social enterprise models: some evidence from the “ICSEM” project // Social Enterprise Journal. - 2017. - 13(4). - P.318–328. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-09-2017-0049Defourny, J., Nyssens, M. (2017). Mapping social enterprise models: some evidence from the “ICSEM” project. Social Enterprise Journal, 13(4), 318–328. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-09-2017-0049Hwang D. S., Jang W., Park J.-S., Kim, S. Social enterprise in South Korea // Social Enterprise Journal. - 2017.- 13(4). – P.362–375. https://doi.org/10.1108/sej-09-2017-0047Hwang, D. S., Jang, W., Park, J.-S., Kim, S. (2017). Social enterprise in South Korea. Social Enterprise Journal, 13(4), 362–375. https://doi.org/10.1108/sej-09-2017-0047Marianne de Beer. Local social value creation by neighborhood-based entrepreneurs: Local embeddedness and the role of social networks // Social Enterprise Journal. - 2018.- 14(4). – P.450–469. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-01-2018-0005Marianne de Beer. (2018). Local social value creation by neighborhood-based entrepreneurs: Local embeddedness and the role of social networks. Social Enterprise Journal, 14(4), 450–469. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-01-2018-0005Арай Ю. Н., Бурмистрова Т. А. Специфика бизнес-моделей в социальном предпринимательстве // Российский журнал менеджмента. - 2014. - № 12(4). - C.55–78.Araj,Ju.N.,Burmistrova,T.A.(2014).Specifika biznes-modelej v socialnom predprinimatelstve. Rossijskij zhurnal menedzhmenta, 12(4), 55–78.Kennedy E. Positioning the beneficiary: The role of entwinement in social enterprise impact and performance management. A Dissertation partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Massachusetts Boston. Boston, 2016. – 280p. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: // https://pqdtopen.proquest.com/doc/1804048286.html?FMT=AI (дата обращения: 01.02.2020).Kennedy, beneficiary: The enterprise impact E. (2016). Positioning the role of entwinement in social and performance management. A Dissertation partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Massachusetts Boston. [Electronic source] URL: https://pqdtopen.proquest.com/doc/1804048286.html?FMT=AI (Date of access: 10.02.2020).Bozhikin I., Macke J., da Costa L. F. The role of government and key non-state actors in social entrepreneurship: A systematic literature review. // JournalofCleaner Production.– 2019.– 226(20).– P.730-747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.076Bozhikin, I., Macke, J., da Costa, L. F. (2019). The role of government and key non-state actors in social entrepreneurship: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 226(20), 730-747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.076Притворова Т.П., Спанова Б.К. Совершенствование нормативно-правовой базы регулирования некоммерческих организаций и социального предпринимательства в Казахстане // Вестник Карагандинского университета. Серия «Экономика».- 2019. - № 1(93). - C.160-173.Pritvorova, T.P., Spanova, B.K. (2019). Sovershenstvovanie normativno-pravovoj bazy regulirovanija nekommercheskih organizacij i socialnogo predprinimatelstva v Kazahstane. Vestnik Karagandinskogo Universiteta. Serija Ekonomika, 1(93), 160-173.Lambooy T., Argyrou A. Improving the Legal Environment for Social Entrepreneurship in Europe // European Company Law. - 2014. – 11(2). https://ssrn.com/abstract=2428706Lambooy, T., Argyrou, A. (2014). Improving the Legal Environment for Social Entrepreneurship in Europe. European Company Law, 11(2). https://ssrn.com/abstract=2428706Jung K., Jang H. S., Seo, I. Government driven social enterprises in South Korea: lessons from the Social Enterprise Promotion Program in the Seoul Metropolitan Government // International Review of Administrative Sciences. -2016. - 82(3), 598–616. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852315586935Jung, K., Jang, H. S., Seo, I. (2016). Government-driven social enterprises in South Korea: lessons from the Social Enterprise Promotion Program in the Seoul Metropolitan Government. International Sciences, Review 82(3), of Administrative 2016, 598–616. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852315586935

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.