espEconomy: strategy and practiceEconomy: strategy and practice1997-99672663-550XИнститут экономики10.51176/1997-9967-2021-2-197-205esp-317Research ArticleСтатьиГендерное равенство и участие женщин в правительстве: на примере КазахстанаGender Equality and Women Participation in Government: the case of Kazakhstanhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3412-3706КирееваА. А.KireyevaA. A.

хат-хабаршы авторы, PhD, ғылыми қызметкер

050010, Алматы қ., Құрманғазы к-сі, 29

8 701 690 0466 

corresponding author, PhD, senior researcher

050010, Almaty, Kurmangazy str. 29

8 701 690 0466

kireyeva.anel@ieconom.kzhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1232-4788КенжегуловаГ. К.KenzhegulovaG. K.

050035, Алматы қ. Жандосова 55, Докторант

8 701 452 2521 

PhD student

050035, Almaty, st. Zhandosova 55

8 701 452 2521

gaukhar.kenzhegulova@gmail.comРаджханО.RajkhanOsama

PhD докторы, Биоэтика және Біртұтас Денсаулық Сақтау Профессоры  

PhD Professor of Bioethics -and Holistic Health

osamarajkhan@gmail.comҚР БҒМ ҒК Экономика институтыКазахстанInstitute of CS MES RKKazakhstanНАРХОЗ университетіКазахстанNARXOZ UniversityKazakhstanАмерикандық Егеменді Ұлттар Университеті Егеменді Ұлттар ҰйымыныңСаудовская АравияAmerican University of Sovereign NationsSaudi Arabia202130062021162197205Copyright © Киреева А.А., Кенжегулова Г.К., Раджхан О., 20212021Киреева А.А., Кенжегулова Г.К., Раджхан О.Kireyeva A.A., Kenzhegulova G.K., Rajkhan O.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://esp.ieconom.kz/jour/article/view/317

Гендерное равноправие на сегодняшний день набирает все большую актуальность в планировании государственной программы по всему миру. Государственные программы при планировании следуют определенным шагам достижения данной цели. Тем не менее, достижение этой цели остается острым во многих развивающихся странах среди которых есть страны Азии и СНГ. Данная статья посвящена вопросу гендерной политики в Республике Казахстан. В статье были рассмотрены такие показатели как участие женщин на руководящих позициях, занятость на рынке труда, образование, разрыв в заработной плате и как они влияют на участие женщин в парламенте. Участие женщин в парламенте было определено как один из ключевых факторов развития гендерного равноправия. В статье рассматривалась теория контекста. Результаты исследования подтвердили данную теорию. Для продвижения политики гендерного равноправия необходимо учитывать контекст применения политики: историю развития страны, социокультурный фактор населения, обеспеченность и тд.. Результаты показали, что разрыв в заработной плате и женское участие на рынке труда оказывают значительное влияние на участие женщин в парламенте. Активность женщин в образовании, то есть, увеличение количества женщин среди студентов, однако, не показали значительного влияния на участие женщин в парламенте. Для проведения регрессионного анализа была использования программа SPSS. Также, было проведен статистический анализ для более глубокого изучения влияние факторов на активность женщин в государстве.

Gender equality today is gaining all the relevance in the planning of the State program around the world. When planning government programs, they follow certain steps to achieve this goal. However, the goal of this system remains acute in many countries around the world. This article is devoted to the issue of gender policy in Kazakhstan. The article examined indicators such as women’s participation in leadership positions, employment in the labor market, education, the wage gap and how they participate in women’s participation in parliament. The participation of women in parliament was identified as one of the key factors in the development of gender equality. The article considered the theory of context. The results of the study confirmed the theory of context. To promote gender equality policies, the application of policies must be considered. The results showed that the wage gap and women’s participation in the labor market have a significant impact on women’s participation in parliament. The activity of women in education, that is, the increase in the number of women among students, however, did not have a significant impact on the participation of women in parliament. The SPSS program was used for the regression analysis. Also, a statistical analysis was carried out for a deeper study of the influence of factors on the activity of women in the state. The SPSS program was used for the regression analysis.

государственная политикагендерное равенствоправительствопарламентыобразованиерабочая силаразрыв в заработной платеpublic policygender equalitygovernmentparliamentseducationlabor forcewage gapThis research has been supported by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan within the project «The science impact on Kazakhstan’s socio-economic development: methodology, assessment models and development scenarios» (IRN AP08052745).ReferencesAllwood, G. (2020) Gender Equality in European Union Development Policy in Times of Crisis // Political Studies Review. - 2020. – № 18(3). – P. 329– 345.Allwood, G. (2020) Gender Equality in European Union Development Policy in Times of Crisis // Political Studies Review. - 2020. – № 18(3). – P. 329–345.Dugarova, E. (2019) Gender, work, and childcare in Kazakhstan, Mongolia, and Russia // Social Policy and Administration. – 2019. – № 53(3). – P. 385– 400.Dugarova, E. (2019) Gender, work, and childcare in Kazakhstan, Mongolia, and Russia // Social Policy and Administration. – 2019. – № 53(3). – P. 385–400.Epple, R., Schief, S. (2016) Fighting (for) gender equality: the roles of social movements and power resources // Journal For And About Social Movement. –2016 . –№ 8(2). – P. 394–432.Epple, R., Schief, S. (2016) Fighting (for) gender equality: the roles of social movements and power resources // Journal For And About Social Movement. –2016 . –№ 8(2). – P. 394–432.Park, S., Liang, J. (2019) A Comparative Study of Gender Representation and Social Outcomes: The Effect of Political and Bureaucratic Representation // Public Administration Review. – 2019. – № 81(2) . – P. 1–12.Park, S., Liang, J. (2019) A Comparative Study of Gender Representation and Social Outcomes: The Effect of Political and Bureaucratic Representation // Public Administration Review. – 2019. – № 81(2) . – P. 1–12.Nandan, A., & Mallick, H. (2020) Does Gender Equality Matter for Regional Growth and Income Inequality? An Empirical Analysis for the Indian States //Journal of International Development. – 2020. – № 32(4). – P. 439–469.Nandan, A., & Mallick, H. (2020) Does Gender Equality Matter for Regional Growth and Income Inequality? An Empirical Analysis for the Indian States //Journal of International Development. – 2020. – № 32(4). – P. 439–469.Connell, R. (2006) Glass Ceilings or Gendered Institutions? Mapping the Gender Regimes of Public Sector Worksite // Public Administration Review. – 2006. – № 66(6). – P. 837-849Connell, R. (2006) Glass Ceilings or Gendered Institutions? Mapping the Gender Regimes of Public Sector Worksite // Public Administration Review. – 2006. – № 66(6). – P. 837-849Irefin. P., Ifah S.S., Bwala M.H. (2012) Organizational Theories and Analysis: A Feminist Perspective // International Journal of Advancements in Research & Technology. – 2012. – № 1(1). – P. 1-27Irefin. P., Ifah S.S., Bwala M.H. (2012) Organizational Theories and Analysis: A Feminist Perspective // International Journal of Advancements in Research & Technology. – 2012. – № 1(1). – P. 1-27Ghosh, T., & Ramanayake, S. S. (2021) The macroeconomics of gender equality // International Journal of Finance and Economics. – 2021. – № 26(2). – P. 1955–1977.Ghosh, T., & Ramanayake, S. S. (2021) The macroeconomics of gender equality // International Journal of Finance and Economics. – 2021. – № 26(2). – P. 1955–1977.Baker, D. B., & Hassan, S. (2021) Gender and Prosecutorial Discretion: An Empirical Assessment // Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. – 2021. – № 31(1). – P. 73–90.Baker, D. B., & Hassan, S. (2021) Gender and Prosecutorial Discretion: An Empirical Assessment // Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. – 2021. – № 31(1). – P. 73–90.Nasser, S. (2018) Boxed women in public administration-between glass ceilings and glass walls: A study of women’s participation in public administration in the Arab States // Journal of International Women’s Studies. – 2018. – № 19(3). – P 152–171.Nasser, S. (2018) Boxed women in public administration-between glass ceilings and glass walls: A study of women’s participation in public administration in the Arab States // Journal of International Women’s Studies. – 2018. – № 19(3). – P 152–171.Rizzo, H., Abdel-Latif, A. H., & Meyer, K. (2007). The relationship between gender equality and democracy: A comparison of Arab versus non-Arab muslim societies. Sociology. – 2007. – 41(6). – P. 1151– 1170.Rizzo, H., Abdel-Latif, A. H., & Meyer, K. (2007). The relationship between gender equality and democracy: A comparison of Arab versus non-Arab muslim societies. Sociology. – 2007. – 41(6). – P. 1151–1170.Moaddel, M. (2006) The Saudi Public Speaks: Religion, Gender, and Politics // International Journal of Middle East Studies. – 2006. – № 38. – P 79–108.Moaddel, M. (2006) The Saudi Public Speaks: Religion, Gender, and Politics // International Journal of Middle East Studies. – 2006. – № 38. – P 79–108.Tessler, M., E. Altinoglu (2004) Political Culture in Turkey: Connections Among Attitudes Toward Democracy, the Military and Islam // Democratization. – 2004. – № 11(1). – P 21–50Tessler, M., E. Altinoglu (2004) Political Culture in Turkey: Connections Among Attitudes Toward Democracy, the Military and Islam // Democratization. – 2004. – № 11(1). – P 21–50Harrits, G. S. (2019). Stereotypes in Context: How and When Do Street-Level Bureaucrats Use Class Stereotypes? Public Administration Review. – 2019. – № 79(1). – P. 93–103.Harrits, G. S. (2019). Stereotypes in Context: How and When Do Street-Level Bureaucrats Use Class Stereotypes? Public Administration Review. – 2019. – № 79(1). – P. 93–103.Kabeer, N., & Natali, L. (2013) Gender Equality and Economic Growth : Is there a Win-Win ? // IDS Workin Papers. – 2013. – № 417. – P. 1-58Kabeer, N., & Natali, L. (2013) Gender Equality and Economic Growth : Is there a Win-Win ? //IDS Workin Papers. – 2013. – № 417. – P. 1-58Hill, M. A., King, E.(1995) Women’s Education and Economic Well-being // Feminist Economics. – 1995. – № 1(2). – P 21-46Hill, M. A., King, E.(1995) Women’s Education and Economic Well-being // Feminist Economics. – 1995. – № 1(2). – P 21-46D’Agostino, M. J. (2017) Changing the Narrative: The Difference Women Make in Public Administration // Administration and Society. – 2017. – № 49(1). – P. 9–19.D’Agostino, M. J. (2017) Changing the Narrative: The Difference Women Make in Public Administration // Administration and Society. – 2017. – № 49(1). – P. 9–19.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.