espEconomy: strategy and practiceEconomy: strategy and practice1997-99672663-550XИнститут экономикиesp-78Research ArticleРЫНОК ТРУДАMODELS FOR WAGES’ FORMATION IN THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTANЕмелинаН. К.YemelinaN. K.noemail@neicon.ruАссановаМ. А.AssanovaM. A.noemail@neicon.ruКозловаН. Г.KozlovaN. G.noemail@neicon.ruКАРАГАНДИНСКИЙ ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКИЙ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ КАЗПОТРЕБСОЮЗАКазахстанKARAGANDA ECONOMIC UNIVERSITY OF KAZPOTREBSOYUZKazakhstan20183012201804101109Copyright © Емелина Н.К., Ассанова М.А., Козлова Н.Г., 20182018Емелина Н.К., Ассанова М.А., Козлова Н.Г.Yemelina N.K., Assanova M.A., Kozlova N.G.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://esp.ieconom.kz/jour/article/view/78

Цель работы - провести выборочный обзор принципов эмпирического анализа, который помогает выделить факторы, влияющие на уровень заработной платы; оценить различия в оплате труда, учитывая гендерный аспект и территориальное положение. Методология корреляционно-регрессионный анализ для построения моделей формирования заработной платы с использованием фиктивных переменных в качестве факторных признаков. Новизна-проведен анализ факторов, влияющих на заработную плату не только на республиканском, но и на региональном и отраслевом уровнях с оценкой отдачи от образования и профессионального опыта. Результаты - определено, что уровень отдачи от образования в Казахстане составляет 8,9%. Однако, этот показатель неодинаков для индивидов мужского и женского пола, а также варьируется относительно отраслей экономики и регионов проживания. Выводы - предложенные модели позволяют получить общую картину относительно факторов формирования заработной платы в Республике Казахстан и описывают тенденции характерные для отечественного рынка труда.

The purpose of the article is to conduct a selective review of the principles of empirical analysis, which helps to identify factors affecting the level of wages; to assess the differences in wages, taking into account the gender aspect and territorial position. Methodology - correlation-regression analysis for building models of wage formation using fictitious variables as factor attributes. Novelty - an analysis of factors affecting wages not only at the national level but also at the regional and sectorial levels, with an assessment of the impact of education and professional experience. Results - it is determined that the rate of return on education in Kazakhstan is 8.9%. However, this indicator is not the same for individuals of male and female sex, and varies with respect to the branches of the economy and the regions of residence. Conclusions - the proposed models allow obtaining an overall picture of the factors of salary formation in the Republic of Kazakhstan, and describing the trend characteristic for the domestic labor market.

жалақыадам капиталыбілім берудегі қайтарымдылықгендерлік айырмашылықеңбек нарығызаработная платачеловеческий капиталотдача от образованияпрофессиональный опытрынок трудаwageshuman capitalreturn on educationprofessional experiencelabor marketReferencesAdam Smith (1964). The Wealth of Nations, London: J.M. Dent & Sons. Reprinted in 1937 as the Cannan edition by The Modern Library, Random House, New York.Adam Smith (1964). The Wealth of Nations, London: J.M. Dent & Sons. Reprinted in 1937 as the Cannan edition by The Modern Library, Random House, New York.Theodore Schultz (1960). Capital Formation by Education, Journal of Political Economy, 68:6, December, 571-583.Theodore Schultz (1960). Capital Formation by Education, Journal of Political Economy, 68:6, December, 571-583.Gary Becker (1964). Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, in Special Reference to Education, New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.Gary Becker (1964). Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, in Special Reference to Education, New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.Jacob Mincer (1958). Investment in Human Capital and Personal Income Distribution, Journal of Political Economy, 66:4, August. - P. 281-302.Jacob Mincer (1958). Investment in Human Capital and Personal Income Distribution, Journal of Political Economy, 66:4, August. - P. 281-302.Jacob Mincer (1962). On-the-Job Training: Costs, Returns, and Some Implications, Journal of Political Economy, 70:5, Part 2, October 1962. - P.50- 79.Jacob Mincer (1962). On-the-Job Training: Costs, Returns, and Some Implications, Journal of Political Economy, 70:5, Part 2, October 1962. - P.50- 79.Jacob Mincer (1957). A Study of Personal Income Distribution, unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, New York: Columbia University, Department of Economics,Jacob Mincer (1957). A Study of Personal Income Distribution, unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, New York: Columbia University, Department of Economics,Bulletins “Key indicators of income income differentiation” for the period from 2001 to 2015 (in Russian).Bulletins “Key indicators of income income differentiation” for the period from 2001 to 2015 (in Russian).Emtsov R., Knobloch S., Mete D. (2006). Return on Education in Transition Economies / Economic Bulletin on Transitional Economy Issues, №11. (in Russian).Emtsov R., Knobloch S., Mete D. (2006). Return on Education in Transition Economies / Economic Bulletin on Transitional Economy Issues, №11. (in Russian).Formation of wages in Kazakhstan and the factors that affect it: Monograph / N.K. Yemelina, Kemelbaeva, N.G. Kozlova - Karaganda, KEUK, 2015 (in Russian).Formation of wages in Kazakhstan and the factors that affect it: Monograph / N.K. Yemelina, Kemelbaeva, N.G. Kozlova - Karaganda, KEUK, 2015 (in Russian).

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.