espEconomy: strategy and practiceEconomy: strategy and practice1997-99672663-550XИнститут экономики10.51176/1997-9967-2022-3-195-209esp-807Research ArticleТРАНСФОРМАЦИЯ ИНСТИТУЦИОНАЛЬНОЙ СРЕДЫ И ГОСУДАРСТВЕННОЕ УПРАВЛЕНИЕTRANSFORMATION OF THE INSTITUTIONAL ENVIRONMENT AND PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIONРеформирование государственных предприятий – новые угрозы и новые возможности для развития экономики УзбекистанаReform of State-Owned Enterprises – New Threats and New Opportunities for the Development of Uzbekistan’s Economyhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8526-6777РасулевА. Ф.RasulevA. F.

Расулев А.Ф. – доктор экономических наук, профессор

Scopus ID: 57190430787

ул. Ислама Каримова, 49, 100066, Ташкент

Alisher F. Rasulev - Doctor of economic sciences, professor

Scopus ID: 57190430787

49 Islam Karimov Str., 100066, Tashkent

arasulev@yandex.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5442-7913ОрынбетП. Ж.OrynbetP. Zh.

Орынбет П.Ж. – PhD, доцент

Scopus ID: 57219234394

пр. Абая 8А, 50010, Алматы

Perizat Zh. Orynbet – PhD

Scopus Author ID: 57219234394

8A Abay Ave., 050010, Almaty

perizat.orynbet@mail.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2288-8365ВоронинС. А.VoroninS. A.

Воронин С.А. – доктор экономических наук, профессор

ул. Ленина 24, 117997, Ташкент

Sergey A. Voronin - Doctor of Economics science, professor

3 Shakhriobod Str., 100164, Tashkent

Sergey_voronin63@yahoo.comhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5346-6726МамарахимовБ. Э.MamarakhimovB. E.

Мамарахимов Б.Э. – кандидат экономических наук, доцент

ул. Ислама Каримова 49, 100066, Ташкент

Bekzod E. Mamarakhimov - Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor

49 Islam Karimov Str., 100066, Tashkent

Ташкентский государственный экономический университетУзбекистанTashkent State University of EconomicsUzbekistanУниверситет международного бизнеса имени К.СагадиеваКазахстанK. Sagadiev University of International BusinessKazakhstanТашкентский филиал Российского экономического университета им. Г.В. ПлехановаУзбекистанTashkent Branch of Plekhanov Russian University of EconomicsUzbekistan202229092022173195209Copyright © Расулев А.Ф., Орынбет П.Ж., Воронин С.А., Мамарахимов Б.Э., 20222022Расулев А.Ф., Орынбет П.Ж., Воронин С.А., Мамарахимов Б.Э.Rasulev A.F., Orynbet P.Z., Voronin S.A., Mamarakhimov B.E.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://esp.ieconom.kz/jour/article/view/807

Целью статьи является определение новых угроз и возможностей в реформировании государственных предприятий Узбекистана для повышения эффективности их деятельности, а также национальной экономики в целом. В ходе исследования были изучены проблема коррупции, методы реформирования государственных предприятий развитых стран, их последствия и направления развития. А также приведён критический взгляд и предложены рекомендации по проведению реформирования государственных предприятий в отечественной экономике. По итогам анализа и разбора государственных программ были выявлены особые проблемы государственных предприятий сферы недропользования, добывающих отраслей, деятельности предприятий, имеющих государственную долю. Результаты исследования свидетельствуют о необходимости усиления надзора за деятельностью государственных предприятий, поскольку их рентабельность или убыточность напрямую влияют на степень сопутствующих фискальных рисков. Государственные предприятия зачастую выполняют квазифискальные функции, привлекая для финансирования отраслевых проектов средства как из государственного бюджета, так и из внешних источников. В сфере реформирования государственных предприятий Узбекистана сделаны ключевые выводы касательно доведения до общественности целей, задач и необходимости проводимых преобразований. Не вызывает сомнений, что реформа государственных предприятий требует существенного изменения законодательства в сфере антимонопольного регулирования и защиты конкуренции, банковско-финансовой системы, улучшения защиты частной собственности и прав потребителей, социальной защиты наиболее уязвимых слоев населения и безработных.

The purpose of this article is to identify new threats and opportunities in the reform of state-owned enterprises in Uzbekistan to improve the efficiency of state-owned enterprises and the national economy as a whole. In the course of this study, the problem of corruption, methods of reforming state enterprises in developing countries, their consequences and directions of development were studied. And also, a critical view is given and recommendations are proposed for the reform of state-owned enterprises in the domestic economy. Based on the results of the analysis and analysis of state programs, special problems were identified in state-owned enterprises in the field of subsoil use, extractive industries and the activities of enterprises with a state share. The results of the study indicate the need to strengthen supervision over the activities of state-owned enterprises, since their profitability or unprofitability directly affects the degree of associated fiscal risks. State- owned enterprises often perform quasi-fiscal functions, attracting funds from both the state budget and external sources to finance industry projects. In the field of reforming state-owned enterprises of Uzbekistan, key conclusions have been made regarding the communication to the public, the goals, objectives and the need for ongoing transformations. There is no doubt that the reform of state-owned enterprises requires significant changes in legislation in the field of antimonopoly regulation and protection of competition, the banking and financial system, improving the protection of private property and consumer rights, social protection of the most vulnerable segments of the population and the unemployed.

государственные предприятияприватизацияконкуренциярыночная экономикацентрализованная экономикареформа собственностиState-Owned EnterprisesPrivatizationCompetitionMarket EconomyCentralized EconomyProperty ReformReferencesApriliyanti, I. D., & Kristiansen, S. (2019). The logics of political business in state-owned enterprises: the case of Indonesia. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 14, 709-730. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-08-2018-0433Apriliyanti, I. D., & Kristiansen, S. (2019). The logics of political business in state-owned enterprises: the case of Indonesia. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 14, 709-730. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-08-2018-0433Baer, W., & Trebat, T. J. (1983). Brazil’s State-Owned Enterprises: A Case Study of the State as Entrepreneur. Americas, 66, 420-421. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182168-66.2.420Baer, W., & Trebat, T. J. (1983). Brazil’s State-Owned Enterprises: A Case Study of the State as Entrepreneur. Americas, 66, 420-421. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182168-66.2.420Bajona, C., & Chu, T. (2010). Reforming state owned enterprises in China: Effects of WTO accession. Review of Economic Dynamics, 13(4), 800-823. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RED.2009.07.003Bajona, C., & Chu, T. (2010). Reforming state owned enterprises in China: Effects of WTO accession. Review of Economic Dynamics, 13(4), 800-823. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RED.2009.07.003Bhatta, G. (2019). Those That Fix the Lights: The Practice of Public Sector Management in Developing Asia. Routledge.Bhatta, G. (2019). “Those That Fix the Lights”: The Practice of Public Sector Management in Developing Asia. Routledge.Bernier, L., Florio, M., & Bance, P. (Eds.). (2020). The Routledge handbook of state-owned enterprises. Routledge.Bernier, L., Florio, M., & Bance, P. (Eds.). (2020). The Routledge handbook of state-owned enterprises. Routledge.Efird, B., Lester, L., & Wise, B. P. (2016). Analyzing coalitions in China’s policy formulation: reforming the role of state owned enterprises in China’s energy sector–erratum. Journal of East Asian Studies, 16, 303-306.Efird, B., Lester, L., & Wise, B. P. (2016). Analyzing coalitions in China’s policy formulation: reforming the role of state owned enterprises in China’s energy sector–erratum. Journal of East Asian Studies, 16, 303-306.Taghizadeh-hesary, F., Yoshino, N., Kim, C. J., & Kim, K. (2021). Reforming State-Owned Enterprises in Asia. Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8574-6Taghizadeh-hesary, F., Yoshino, N., Kim, C. J., & Kim, K. (2021). Reforming State-Owned Enterprises in Asia. Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8574-6Gil-López, Á., Arzubiaga, U., Román, E. S., & De Massis, A. (2020). The Visible Hand of corporate entrepreneurship in state-owned enterprises: a longitudinal study of the Spanish National Postal Operator. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 18, 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-020-00700-yGil-López, Á., Arzubiaga, U., Román, E. S., & De Massis, A. (2020). The Visible Hand of corporate entrepreneurship in state-owned enterprises: a longitudinal study of the Spanish National Postal Operator. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 18, 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-020-00700-yHendarto, T., Nurjaya, I. N., Djatmika, P., & Madjid, A. (2021). The Meaning of Corporate Oversight of State-Owned Enterprises as Condition of Criminal Liability. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 7(11), 619-628. https://doi.org/10.18415/IJMMU.V7I11.2261Hendarto, T., Nurjaya, I. N., Djatmika, P., & Madjid, A. (2021). The Meaning of Corporate Oversight of State-Owned Enterprises as Condition of Criminal Liability. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 7(11), 619-628. https://doi.org/10.18415/IJMMU.V7I11.2261Hickey, W. (2020). Reforming State- Owned Enterprises. In The Sovereignty Game (pp. 85-97). Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore.Hickey, W. (2020). Reforming State-Owned Enterprises. In The Sovereignty Game (pp. 85-97). Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore.Huang, L. J., & Snell, R. S. (2003). Turnaround, corruption and mediocrity: Leadership and governance in three state owned enterprises in Mainland China. Journal of Business Ethics, 43(1), 111-124. https://doi.org/10.1023/A%3A1022919418838Huang, L. J., & Snell, R. S. (2003). Turnaround, corruption and mediocrity: Leadership and governance in three state owned enterprises in Mainland China. Journal of Business Ethics, 43(1), 111-124. https://doi.org/10.1023/A%3A1022919418838Junqueira, C. A., & Abrantes, E. A. (2016). Brazil: State-owned enterprises. International financial law review, 35(36), 36-36.Junqueira, C. A., & Abrantes, E. A. (2016). Brazil: State-owned enterprises. International financial law review, 35(36), 36-36.Khan, F. U., Zhang, J., Usman, M., Badulescu, A., & Sial, M. S. (2019). Ownership Reduction in state-owned enterprises and corporate social responsibility: Perspective from secondary privatization in China. Sustainability, 11(4), 1008-1023. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041008Khan, F. U., Zhang, J., Usman, M., Badulescu, A., & Sial, M. S. (2019). Ownership Reduction in state-owned enterprises and corporate social responsibility: Perspective from secondary privatization in China. Sustainability, 11(4), 1008-1023. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041008Kiranmai, J., & Mishra, R. K. (2019). Corporate Governance Practices in Listed Stateowned Enterprises in India: An Empirical Research. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 12(1), 94-121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974686219849760Kiranmai, J., & Mishra, R. K. (2019). Corporate Governance Practices in Listed Stateowned Enterprises in India: An Empirical Research. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 12(1), 94-121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974686219849760Kumar, S. (2018). MoU System in State-owned Enterprises in India: A Tool in Strategic Management. Indian Journal of Public Administration, 64(1), 36-48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0019556117735460Kumar, S. (2018). MoU System in State-owned Enterprises in India: A Tool in Strategic Management. Indian Journal of Public Administration, 64(1), 36-48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0019556117735460Li, D. D., & Wu, C. (2002). Reforming state-owned enterprises: diversifying ownership versus improving management. In The management of enterprises in the People’s Republic of China (pp. 79-98). Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1095-6_5Li, D. D., & Wu, C. (2002). Reforming state-owned enterprises: diversifying ownership versus improving management. In The management of enterprises in the People’s Republic of China (pp. 79-98). Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1095-6_5Perkins, D. H. (1993). Summary: Why is reforming state-owned enterprises so difficult? China Economic Review, 4 (2), 149-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/1043-951X%2893%2990016-SPerkins, D. H. (1993). Summary: Why is reforming state-owned enterprises so difficult? China Economic Review, 4 (2), 149-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/1043-951X%2893%2990016-SSilvestre, H. C., Gomes, R. C., & Miorin G. R. (2018). The Institutional Settings for the Development of Public Services through State-Owned Enterprises in Brazil. International Journal of Public Administration, 41(1), 59-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2016.1247368Silvestre, H. C., Gomes, R. C., & Miorin G. R. (2018). The Institutional Settings for the Development of Public Services through State-Owned Enterprises in Brazil. International Journal of Public Administration, 41(1), 59-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2016.1247368Wachira, R. W. (2003). Response of state owned enterprises to corporate governance reforms (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nairobi.).Wachira, R. W. (2003). Response of state owned enterprises to corporate governance reforms (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nairobi.).Glinkina, S. P. (2004). The results of privatization in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe. Property Management, 2, 33-43.Glinkina, S. P. (2004). The results of privatization in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe. Property Management [Upravlenie sobstvennost›ju], 2, 33-43. (in Russ)Decree of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan. On measures to further accelerate the processes of privatization of state assets. National Database of Legislation of the Republic of Uzbekistan, (2020). [updated October 27, 2020; cited March 30, 2022]. Available: https://lex.uz/uz/docs/5068826Decree of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan. On measures to further accelerate the processes of privatization of state assets. National Database of Legislation of the Republic of Uzbekistan [Nacional’naja baza dannyh zakonodatel’stva Respubliki Uzbekistan], (2020). [updated October 27, 2020; cited March 30, 2022]. Available: https://lex.uz/uz/docs/5068826 (in Russ)Khamidulin, M. B. (2020). Regions in the strategies of international interaction and cooperation of the EAEU countries and other countries of Greater Eurasia. Greater Eurasia: development, security, cooperation, (3-2), 927-930.Khamidulin, M. B. (2020). Regions in the strategies of international interaction and cooperation of the EAEU countries and other countries of Greater Eurasia. Greater Eurasia: development, security, cooperation [Bol’shaja Evrazija: Razvitie, bezopasnost’, sotrudnichestvo], (3-2), 927-930. (in Russ)

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.