espEconomy: strategy and practiceEconomy: strategy and practice1997-99672663-550XИнститут экономики10.51176/1997-9967-2023-1-6-19esp-964Research ArticleИННОВАЦИИ, ИННОВАЦИОННО-ТЕХНОЛОГИЧЕСКОЕ РАЗВИТИЕ, ЦИФРОВИЗАЦИЯINNOVATION, INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT, DIGITALIZATIONМировые тренды измерения инновационного потенциала предприятияGlobal Trends in Measuring the Innovative Potential of an Enterprisehttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4850-3793СарсенК. А.SarsenK. A.

PhD докторант

ул. Сатпаева 2, 010008, Астана

PhD candidate

2 Satpaeva Str., 010008, Astana

kassym.sarsen@yandex.kzhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7608-9246КирдасиноваК. А.КirdasinovaK. A.

к.э.н., профессор

ул. Сатпаева 2, 010008, Астана

Candidate of Economics, Professor

2 Satpaeva Str., 010008, Astana

marso310@mail.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6877-7674ОрозоноваА. А.OrozonovaA. A.

к.э.н., доцент

ул. Михаила Фрунзе 547, Бишкек

Candidate of Economics, Associate Professor

547 Mikhail Frunze Str., Bishkek

E77ASK@yandex.ruЕвразийский национальный университет им. Л.Н. ГумилеваКазахстанL.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National UniversityKazakhstanКыргызский национальный университет имени Жусупа БаласагынаКыргызстанZhusup Balasagyn Kyrgyz National UniversityKyrgyzstan202301042023181619Copyright © Сарсен К.А., Кирдасинова К.А., Орозонова А.А., 20232023Сарсен К.А., Кирдасинова К.А., Орозонова А.А.Sarsen K.A., Кirdasinova K.A., Orozonova A.A.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://esp.ieconom.kz/jour/article/view/964

Цель исследования: качественное и количественное сравнение инструментов для оценки эффективности использования инновационного потенциала предприятия. Для достижения цели исследования, поставлены следующие задачи: изучить структуру компоненты инновационного потенциала в контексте достижения эффективности бизнеса; оценить инструменты, используемые на практике для исследования инновационного потенциала предприятия; сравнить инструменты для оценки инновационного потенциала предприятий с точки зрения рентабельности и эффективности предприятия.Результаты данного исследования позволят обосновать современную концепцию инновационной деятельности предприятия, основанную на структуре инновационного потенциала, состоящей из четырех составляющих: научно-исследовательской, кадровой, материальной и технической базы, корпоративного предпринимательства. Во-вторых, исследование направлено на изучение оценки инновационного потенциала предприятия, которая отличается качеством и количеством используемых показателей. К инструментам измерения, используемым на практике, относятся: сбалансированная система показателей; многоуровневая оценка с использованием дерева кластерных факторов; оценка на основе мировых индексов и/или мониторинга; смешанный и статистический подход. В-третьих, было установлено, что на основе практических и ценностных критериев эффективна система сбалансированных показателей инновационного потенциала предприятия и экономического обоснования развития развитых структур экономики, а также для предприятий, ориентированных на инновационную капитализацию и корпоративное предпринимательство. Инструменты с вероятностными, аналитическими и статистическими методами измерения также полезны для развитых секторов экономики и для предприятий, ориентированных на устойчивый бизнес.

The purpose of the study: qualitative and quantitative comparison of tools for assessing the effectiveness of the use of the innovative potential of the enterprise. To achieve the research goal, the following tasks are set: to study the structure of the components of innovation potential in the context of achieving business efficiency; evaluate the tools used in practice to study the innovative potential of the enterprise; compare the tools for assessing the innovative potential of enterprises in terms of profitability and efficiency of the enterprise. The results of this study will allow us to substantiate the modern concept of innovative activity of the enterprise, based on the structure of innovative potential, consisting of four components: research, personnel, material and technical base, and corporate entrepreneurship. Secondly, the study aims to assess the enterprise’s innovative potential, which differs in the quality and quantity of indicators used. The measurement tools used in practice include a balanced scorecard; multilevel assessment using a tree of cluster factors; assessment based on world indices and/or monitoring; mixed and statistical approach. Thirdly, it was found that on the basis of practical and value criteria, a system of balanced indicators of the innovative potential of an enterprise and an economic justification for the development of developed economic structures, as well as for enterprises focused on innovative capitalization and corporate entrepreneurship, is effective. Tools with probabilistic, analytical and statistical measurement methods are also useful for developed sectors of the economy and for enterprises focused on sustainable business. 

экономикастратегияпрактикаинновациябизнес стратегияпредприятиеEconomyStrategyPracticeInnovationBusiness StrategyEnterpriseReferencesBourne, M., Kennerley, M., & Franco‐Santos, M. (2005). Managing through measures: a study of impact on performance. Journal of manufacturing technology management, 16(4), 373-395. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410380510594480Bourne, M., Kennerley, M., & Franco‐ Santos, M. (2005). Managing through measures: a study of impact on performance. Journal of manufacturing technology management, 16(4), 373- 395. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410380510594480Bousmah, I., (2021). Entrepreneurship in rural Canada: necessity or opportunity driven? Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada, Ottawa, 1-21. https://ised-isde.canada.ca/site/sme-research-statistics/en/research-reports/ entrepreneurship-rural-canada-necessity-oropportunity-drivenBousmah, I., (2021). Entrepreneurship in rural Canada: necessity or opportunity driven? Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada, Ottawa, 1-21. https://ised-isde.canada.ca/site/sme-research-statistics/en/research-reports/ entrepreneurship-rural-canada-necessity-oropportunity-drivenBuenechea-Elberdin, M. (2017). Structured literature review about intellectual capital and innovation. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 262-285. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-07-2016-0069Bousmah, I., (2021). Entrepreneurship in rural Canada: necessity or opportunity driven? Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada, Ottawa, 1-21. https://ised-isde.canada.ca/ site/sme-research-statistics/en/research-reports/ entrepreneurship-rural-canada-necessity-oropportunity-drivenEdvinsson, L., & Malone, M. S. (1997). Intellectual capital: Realizing your company’s true value by finding its hidden brainpower. Harper Business, New York.Edvinsson, L., & Malone, M. S. (1997). Intellectual capital: Realizing your company’s true value by finding its hidden brainpower. Harper Business, New York.Ferreira, J. J., Fernandes, C. I., & Ratten, V. (2017). Entrepreneurship, innovation and competitiveness: what is the connection? International Journal of Business and Globalisation, 18(1), 73-95. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBG.2017.081030Buenechea-Elberdin, M. (2017). Structured literature review about intellectual capital and innovation. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 262- 285. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-07-2016-0069Frolova, L., Zhadko, K., Ilyash, O., Yermak, S., & Nosova, T. (2021). Model for opportunities assessment to increase the enterprise innovation activity. Business: Theory and Practice, 22(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2021.13273Frolova, L., Zhadko, K., Ilyash, O., Yermak, S., & Nosova, T. (2021). Model for opportunities assessment to increase the enterprise innovation activity. Business: Theory and Practice, 22(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2021.13273Huseynova, A. D., Salifova, T. S., Alakbarov, E. E., & Abbasova, G. I. (2021). Calculation Method of Innovation Index of Azerbaijan. Information and innovation, 16(2), 42-50. https://doi.org/10.31432/1994-2443-2021-16-2-42-50Edvinsson, L., & Malone, M. S. (1997). Intellectual capital: Realizing your company’s true value by finding its hidden brainpower. Harper Business, New York.Kalu, K., & Okafor, O. N. (2021). Programming for immigrant women in Canada: is entrepreneurship neglected?. International Migration, 59(1), 105-125. https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12724Kalu, K., & Okafor, O. N. (2021). Programming for immigrant women in Canada: is entrepreneurship neglected?. International Migration, 59(1), 105-125. https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12724Knubley, J. (2021). Building Superclusters for Canada. Brookfield Institute for Innovation+ Entrepreneurship. Toronto: Brookfield Institute.Ferreira, J. J., Fernandes, C. I., & Ratten, V. (2017). Entrepreneurship, innovation and competitiveness: what is the connection? International Journal of Business and Globalisation, 18(1), 73-95. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBG.2017.081030Kultyn, N., & Tsybuliak, A. (2018). Innovation potential of the enterprise: valuation and value management. Innovations, 3(233), 106-112.Kultyn, N., & Tsybuliak, A. (2018). Innovation potential of the enterprise: valuation and value management. Innovations, 3(233), 106-112.Kuratko, D. F. (2017). Corporate entrepreneurship & innovation: Today’s leadership challenge. In The Wiley handbook of entrepreneurship: John Wiley & Sons.Frolova, L., Zhadko, K., Ilyash, O., Yermak, S., & Nosova, T. (2021). Model for opportunities assessment to increase the enterprise innovation activity. Business: Theory and Practice, 22(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2021.13273Le, S. T. K. (2020). Measuring innovation efforts of developing countries: Empirical evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, 33(3), 163-194. https://doi.org/10.3917/jie.033.0163Le, S. T. K. (2020). Measuring innovation efforts of developing countries: Empirical evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, 33(3), 163-194. https://doi.org/10.3917/jie.033.0163Ludeke-Freund, F. (2020). Sustainable entrepreneurship, innovation, and business models: Integrative framework and propositions for future research. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(2), 665-681. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2396Huseynova, A. D., Salifova, T. S., Alakbarov, E. E., & Abbasova, G. I. (2021). Calculation Method of Innovation Index of Azerbaijan. Information and innovation, 16(2), 42-50. https://doi. org/10.31432/1994-2443-2021-16-2-42-50Piperopoulos, P., Wu, J., & Wang, C. (2018). Outward FDI, location choices and innovation performance of emerging market enterprises. Research Policy, 47(1), 232-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.11.001Piperopoulos, P., Wu, J., & Wang, C. (2018). Outward FDI, location choices and innovation performance of emerging market enterprises. Research Policy, 47(1), 232-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.11.001Valitov, S. M., & Khakimov, A. K. (2015). Innovative potential as a framework of innovative strategy for enterprise development Innovative potential as a framework of innovative strategy for enterprise development. Procedia Economics and Finance, 24, 716-721. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00682-6Kalu, K., & Okafor, O. N. (2021). Programming for immigrant women in Canada: is entrepreneurship neglected?. International Migration, 59(1), 105-125. https://doi.org/10.1111/ imig.12724Sherifi, I., Andrushchenko, H., Vankovych, D., Solokha, D., Malyshenko, I., & Yavorska, N. (2020). Strategic management of industrial enterprise innovation potential development. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 19(6), 1-8.Sherifi, I., Andrushchenko, H., Vankovych, D., Solokha, D., Malyshenko, I., & Yavorska, N. (2020). Strategic management of industrial enterprise innovation potential development. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 19(6), 1-8.Karim Suhag, A., Solangi, S. R., Larik, R. S. A., Lakh, M. K., & Tagar, A. H. (2017). The relationship of innovation with organizational performance. International Journal of Research-Granthaalayah, 5(2), 292-306. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.345736Knubley, J. (2021). Building Superclusters for Canada. Brookfield Institute for Innovation+ Entrepreneurship. Toronto: Brookfield Institute.Taques, F. H., López, M. G., Basso, L. F., & Areal, N. (2021). Indicators used to measure service innovation and manufacturing innovation. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 6(1), 11-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2019.12.001Taques, F. H., López, M. G., Basso, L. F., & Areal, N. (2021). Indicators used to measure service innovation and manufacturing innovation. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 6(1), 11-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2019.12.001Terebova, S. (2021). Enterprise innovation potential: structure and valuation. Scientific Works: Institute for Economic Forecasting RAS, 15, 336-354. 20. Waal, J., Thijssens, Т., & Maas, К. (2021). The innovative contribution of multinational enterprises to the Sustainable Development Goals. Journal of Cleaner Production, 285, 125319 https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125319Kultyn, N., & Tsybuliak, A. (2018). Innovation potential of the enterprise: valuation and value management. Innovations, 3(233), 106-112.Kuratko, D. F. (2017). Corporate entrepreneurship & innovation: Today’s leadership challenge. In The Wiley handbook of entrepreneurship: John Wiley & Sons.Kuratko, D. F. (2017). Corporate entrepreneurship & innovation: Today’s leadership challenge. In The Wiley handbook of entrepreneurship: John Wiley & Sons.Le, S. T. K. (2020). Measuring innovation efforts of developing countries: Empirical evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, 33(3), 163-194. https://doi.org/10.3917/ jie.033.0163Le, S. T. K. (2020). Measuring innovation efforts of developing countries: Empirical evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, 33(3), 163-194. https://doi.org/10.3917/ jie.033.0163Ludeke-Freund, F. (2020). Sustainable entrepreneurship, innovation, and business models: Integrative framework and propositions for future research. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(2), 665-681. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2396Ludeke-Freund, F. (2020). Sustainable entrepreneurship, innovation, and business models: Integrative framework and propositions for future research. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(2), 665-681. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2396Piperopoulos, P., Wu, J., & Wang, C. (2018). Outward FDI, location choices and innovation performance of emerging market enterprises. Research Policy, 47(1), 232-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. respol.2017.11.001Piperopoulos, P., Wu, J., & Wang, C. (2018). Outward FDI, location choices and innovation performance of emerging market enterprises. Research Policy, 47(1), 232-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. respol.2017.11.001Valitov, S. M., & Khakimov, A. K. (2015). Innovative potential as a framework of innovative strategy for enterprise development Innovative potential as a framework of innovative strategy for enterprise development. Procedia Economics and Finance, 24, 716-721. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212- 5671(15)00682-6Valitov, S. M., & Khakimov, A. K. (2015). Innovative potential as a framework of innovative strategy for enterprise development Innovative potential as a framework of innovative strategy for enterprise development. Procedia Economics and Finance, 24, 716-721. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212- 5671(15)00682-6Sherifi, I., Andrushchenko, H., Vankovych, D., Solokha, D., Malyshenko, I., & Yavorska, N. (2020). Strategic management of industrial enterprise innovation potential development. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 19(6), 1-8.Sherifi, I., Andrushchenko, H., Vankovych, D., Solokha, D., Malyshenko, I., & Yavorska, N. (2020). Strategic management of industrial enterprise innovation potential development. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 19(6), 1-8.Karim Suhag, A., Solangi, S. R., Larik, R. S. A., Lakh, M. K., & Tagar, A. H. (2017). The relationship of innovation with organizational performance. International Journal of Research-Granthaalayah, 5(2), 292-306. https://doi.org/10.5281/ zenodo.345736Karim Suhag, A., Solangi, S. R., Larik, R. S. A., Lakh, M. K., & Tagar, A. H. (2017). The relationship of innovation with organizational performance. International Journal of Research-Granthaalayah, 5(2), 292-306. https://doi.org/10.5281/ zenodo.345736Taques, F. H., López, M. G., Basso, L. F., & Areal, N. (2021). Indicators used to measure service innovation and manufacturing innovation. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 6(1), 11-26. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jik.2019.12.001Taques, F. H., López, M. G., Basso, L. F., & Areal, N. (2021). Indicators used to measure service innovation and manufacturing innovation. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 6(1), 11-26. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jik.2019.12.001Terebova, S. (2021). Enterprise innovation potential: structure and valuation. Scientific Works: Institute for Economic Forecasting RAS, 15, 336-354. 20. Waal, J., Thijssens, Т., & Maas, К. (2021). The innovative contribution of multinational enterprises to the Sustainable Development Goals. Journal of Cleaner Production, 285, 125319 https://doi. Org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125319Terebova, S. (2021). Enterprise innovation potential: structure and valuation. Scientific Works: Institute for Economic Forecasting RAS, 15, 336-354. 20. Waal, J., Thijssens, Т., & Maas, К. (2021). The innovative contribution of multinational enterprises to the Sustainable Development Goals. Journal of Cleaner Production, 285, 125319 https://doi. Org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125319

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.