Public Trust and Energy in Kazakhstan: Assessment of the Role of State Agencies

Currently, the government of the Republic of Kazakhstan has made an important decision regarding constructing a nuclear power station in the country. In matters of nuclear policy implementation, the state often faces strong scepticism or distrust from the public. Therefore, it is necessary for the authorities to clarify to citizens the goals and importance of the initiative to build the plant and to understand public concerns and the acceptability of nuclear energy. This study examines public awareness and the transparency of government agencies in implementing state policy regarding constructing a nuclear power plant in the Republic of Kazakhstan. The aim of this research is to analyze the public recognition and readiness of the population to support the state’s energy policy, to analyze the population’s trust in government agencies implementing this policy, and the acceptability of building a nuclear power plant in the Republic of Kazakhstan. The study uses both quantitative and qualitative analysis methods, as well as surveys and SWOT analysis. In addition, the work presents informational materials from state institutions, news articles, and an analysis of international experience in the field of nuclear energy. The survey results showed that at the moment, the state needs to take measures to obtain broad public support for the development of nuclear energy, as the population has very different views on the benefits of operating a nuclear power plant. Additionally, the research identified gaps in informing the population about the country’s energy policy and low public trust in the authorities. Furthermore, a SWOT analysis revealed «weak» points and existing problems in implementing the energy policy. 

1. Akorda.kz. (2022). The head of state held a meeting on the development of the electric power industry -official website of the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan. [cited April 9, 2023]. Available: https://akorda.kz/ru/glava-gosudarstvaprovel-soveshchanie-po-voprosam-razvitiyaelektroenergeticheskoy-otrasli-2641240 (In Kaz.)

2. Alzahrani, S. M., Alwafi, A. M., & Alshehri, S. M. (2023). A framework of examining the factors affecting public acceptance of Nuclear Power Plant: Case Study in Saudi Arabia. Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 55(3), 908–918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2022.11.009

3. Berry, T., Morgaine, B., Landau, C., Koharchick, B., & Lisa Furgison. (2020). How to do a SWOT analysis for better strategic planning: Bplans. Bplans Blog. [cited August 18, 2022]. Available: https://articles.bplans.com/how-to-performswot-analysis/

4. Demoscope (2021). The attitude of Kazakhstanis to the construction of nuclear power plants. Demoscope. [cited January 26, 2023]. Available: https:// demos.kz/otnoshenie-kazahstancev-k-stroitelstvu-ajes/ (In Russ.)

5. Demoscope. (2022). Perception and dissemination of disinformation in Kazakhstani media and social networks. Demoscope. [cited January 28, 2023]. Available: https://demos.kz/vosprijatie-irasprostranenie-dezinformacii-v-kazahstanskih-mediai-socsetjah-2/ (In Russ.)

6. Gubarev, V. (2004). Ulba: Uranium, Berrillium and Tantalum. Science and life. [cited January 26, 2023]. Available: https://www.nkj.ru/archive/articles/2643/ (In Russ.).

7. Gupta, K., Nowlin, M. C., Ripberger, J. T., Jenkins-Smith, H. C., & Silva, C. L. (2019). Tracking the nuclear ‘mood’ in the United States: Introducing a long-term measure of public opinion about nuclear energy using aggregate survey data. Energy Policy, 133, 110888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.110888

8. IAEA (2016). Stakeholder engagement: Nuclear energy. [cited April 10, 2023]. Available: https://www.iaea.org/topics/stakeholder-engagement

9. Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2012). Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Information Systems Management, 29(4), 258–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2012.716740

10. Levashova, Yu. (2015). Information openness of public authorities as a technology of interaction between authorities and society. elar.urfu.ru. [cited January 28, 2023]. Available: https://elar.urfu.ru/bitstream/10995/38849/1/dn_2015_02_30.pdf (In Russ.).

11. Nguyen, V. P., & Yim, M. S. (2018). Examination of different socioeconomic factors that contribute to the public acceptance of nuclear energy. Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 50(5), 767–772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2018.02.005

12. Park, E. (2019). Positive or negative? public perceptions of nuclear energy in South Korea: Evidence from big data. Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 51(2), 626–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2018.10.025

13. Sugiawan, Y., & Managi, S. (2019). Public acceptance of nuclear power plants in Indonesia: Portraying the role of a multilevel governance system. Energy Strategy Reviews, 26, 100427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2019.100427

14. Van de Walle, S., & Bouckaert, G. (2003). Public service performance and trust in government: The problem of causality. International Journal of Public Administration, 26(8-9), 891–913. https://doi.org/10.1081/pad-120019352

15. World Nuclear Association. (2023). Nuclear Power in France. Nuclear Power in France | French Nuclear Energy - World Nuclear Association. [cited January 28, 2023]. Available: https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/country-profiles/countries-a-f/france.aspx

16. Xenos, M., Vromen, A., & Loader, B. (2014). The great equalizer? Patterns of social media use and youth political engagement in three advanced democracies. Information, Communication & Society, 17(2), 151-167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.871318