Основные факторы и тенденции урбанизации в Казахстане: анализ и рекомендации

С развитием промышленности, индустриализацией сельского хозяйства, усилением трендов Индустрии 4.0 во всех странах мира усиливаются тенденции миграции сельских жителей в города и повышаются темпы урбанизации. Целью статьи явилось исследование основных факторов, определяющих тенденции, интенсивность и особенности процессов урбанизации в Казахстане. Использованы методы ретроспективного анализа, аналогий, логического анализа и обобщений, демографической и экономической статистики, индексный, графический, сравнительного анализа, абсолютные и относительные показатели демографии и миграции, методы теории дифференцированной урбанизации. Были применены специфические методы расчетов коэффициентов интенсивности урбанизации. Для достижения цели проведен сравнительный анализ теоретических воззрений на тенденции и факторы урбанизации. На базе статистических данных был осуществлен сравнительный анализ рождаемости, уровня и качества жизни, уровня бедности в городах и селах Казахстана. Выявлены динамика, направленность, территориальное распределение процессов урбанизации. Для определения иерархии городов в зависимости от численности населения рассчитаны кривые Ципфа и проведено ранжирование городов. Сделан вывод о неравномерности распределения процессов урбанизации на территории страны, а также о том, что факторы урбанизации в полной мере проявляются в казахстанских условиях и определяют ее тенденции и интенсивность. Исходя из выявленных тенденций и проблем урбанизации обоснованы рекомендации по выбору основных направлений и механизмов регулирования процессов урбанизации в Казахстане.

1. World Development Report (2009). A New look at economic Geography (2009) [updated August 10, 2021; cited August 23, 2021] Available: https://www.un.org/ru/development/surveys/docs/worlddev2009.pdf

2. World Urbanization Prospect: The 2018 Revision. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2018) [updated August 10, 2021; cited August 31, 2021]. Available: http: creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/iga

3. Akhmedov, T. (2019). Urbanization is an important factor of sustainable economic development and improving the welfare of the population [updated August 10, 2021; cited August 27, 2021]. Available: Access mode: https://mineconomy.uz/ru/node/2459

4. Gibbs, J. P. (1963). The evolution of population concentration. Economic geography, 39(2), 119-129. https://doi.org/10.2307/142505

5. Kalhor, K., & Mahdisoltani, M. (2015). Urbanization and its effects on the environment and society along with sustainable development. In Third International Symposium on Environmental and Water Resources Engineering, Tehran, Iran.

6. Mulholland, P.J., Helton, A.M., Poole, G.C., Hall, R.O., Hamilton, S.K., Peterson, B.J., Tank, J.L., Ashkenas, L.R., Cooper, L.W., Dahm, C.N., Dodds, W.K., Findlay, S.E., Gregory, S.V., Grimm, N.B., Johnson, S.L., McDowell, W.H., Meyer, J.L., Valett, H.M., Webster, J.R., Arango, C.P., Beaulieu, J.J., Bernot, M.J., Burgin, A.J., Crenshaw, C.L., Johnson, L.T., Niederlehner, B.R., O’Brien, J.M., Potter, J.D., Sheibley, R.W., Sobota, D.J., & Thomas, S.M. (2008). Stream denitrification across biomes and its response to anthropogenic nitrate loading. Nature, 452, 202-205. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06686

7. Brockerhoff, M. (2000). An urbanizing world. Population Bulletin, 55(3), 3-44. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.384.9522&rep=rep1&type=pdf

8. Nurlanova, N.K., Alzhanova, F.G., & Satpayeva, Z. (2021). The quality of urban space as a factor of sustainable economic development of Almaty. Strategija: jekonomika i praktika [Economics: the strategy and practice], 16(2), 5-20. https://doi.org/10.51176/1997-9967-2021-2-5-20 (In Russ.)

9. Alzhanova, F., Celetti, D., Nurlatova, N., & Satpayeva, Z. (2021). Quality of Urban Space in The Eurasian Context. In XV International Conference” Russian Regions in the Focus of Changes”(ICRRFC 2020) (pp. 21-29). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.210213.004

10. Geyer, H.S., & Kontuly, T. (1993). A theoretical foundation for the concept of differential urbanization. International Regional Science Review, 15(2), 157-177. https://doi.org/10.1177/016001769301500202

11. Lever, W.F. (1993). Competition within the European urban system. Urban Studies, 30(6), 935-948. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420989320080871

12. Xing, C., & Zhang, J. (2017). The preference for larger cities in China: Evidence from rural-urban migrants. China Economic Review, 43, 72-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2017.01.005

13. Molyarenko, O. A. (2013). Distributed lifestyle and counter-urban processes as factors of rural and urban settlements development. Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i municipal’nogo upravlenija [Issues of state and municipal administration], 1, 43-63. (In Russ.)

14. Nefedova, T. G., Pokrovsky, N. Y., & Al, T. (2015). Urbanization, deurbanization and rural-urban communities in conditions of increasing horizontal mobility. Sociologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological researc], 12 (12), 60-69. (In Russ.)

15. Zvyagintsev, V. I., Neuvazhaeva, M. A. (2015). Migrants to rural areas: the phenomenon of “reverse migration” in modern Russia. Mir rossii [The World of Russia], 24(1), 101-135. (In Russ.)

16. Nekrasov, N.N. (1966). Scientific problems of the general layout of the productive forces of the USSR. Tezisy` doklada na Obshhem sobranii Otdeleniya e`konomiki AN SSSR [Abstracts of the report at the General meeting of the Department of economics of the AS USSR]. Moscow. - Р - 7. (In Russ.)

17. Turgel, I.D. (2008). Theoretical and methodological aspects of the study of the life cycle of the cit. Voprosy` upravleniya [Management issues], 3, 94-104. (In Russ.)

18. Factors of production placement [updated August 10, 2021; cited August 31, 2021]. Available: https://geographyofrussia.com/faktory-razmeshheniyaproizvodstva

19. Sorokina, N. Yu., & Latov, Yu. V. (2018). Evolution of Old Industrial regions in the Russian economy. Voprosy` regulirovaniya e`konomiki [Economic regulation issues], 9(1), 6-22. https://doi.org/10.17835/2078-5429.2018.9.1.006-022 (In Russ.)

20. Artemova, O.V., Logacheva, N.M., & Savchenko, A.N. (2021). Harmonisation of Space in an Industrial City: Social Guidelines. Economy of region, 17(2), 538-551. https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2021-2-13

21. Ignatovskaya, Yu.A. Dynamics of the development of cities in Belarus. Geographical sciences in ensuring sustainable development in the context of globalization (2012) [updated August 15, 2021; cited October 30, 2021] Available: http://elib.bsu.by/handle/123456789/28184

22. Rastvortseva, S.N., & Manaeva, I.V. (2020). Zakon CIPFA v gorodax Rossii. Analiz novy`x pokazatelej. Economy of region, 16(3), 935-947. https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2020-3-20 (In Russ.)

23. Kitzes, W. Urban growth: patterns and Models (2016) [updated August 10, 2021; cited August 23, 2021] Available: http://wolf-kitses.livejournal.com/49228.html

24. Bureau of National Statistics (2021). [updated October 19, 2021; cited October 30, 2021]. Available: http://www.stat.gov.kz

25. Recommendations based on the results of an analytical study “Sustainable poles of growth” (2020). Foundation of the First President of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Elbasy. Nur-Sultan. 70.

26. Proto, E., & Rustichini, A. (2015). Life Satisfaction, Income and Personality. Journal of Economic Psychology, 48, 17-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOEP.2015.02.001

27. Easterlin, R.A. (2001). Income and Happiness: Towards a Unified Theory. The Economic Journal, 111, 465-484. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00646

28. Winters, J.V., & Li, Y. (2015). Urbanization, Natural Amenities, and Subjective Well-Being: Evidence from U.S. Counties. IZA Discussion Paper, 8966. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2598886

29. Roback, J. (1982). Wages, rents, and the quality of life. Journal of Political Economy, 90, 1257-1278. https://doi.org/10.1086/261120

30. Winters, J.V. (2009). Wages and prices: Are workers fully compensated for cost of living differences? Regional Science and Urban Economics, 39(5), 632-643. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.REGSCIURBECO.2009.05.001

31. Oswald, A.J., & Wu, S. (2011). Well-Being across America. Review of Economics and Statistics, 93, 1118-1134. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00133

32. Glaeser, E.L., Gottlieb, J.D., & Ziv, O. (2016). Unhappy Cities. Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation Research Paper Series, 20291. https://doi.org/10.3386/w20291

33. Al-Fahad, A.Z.M. (2016). Concepts of urban development in developing countries. Vestnik universiteta [Bulletin of the university], 11, 12-17. (In Russ.)

34. Bibatyrova, I.A., & Sansyzbayeva, G.N. (2018). Urban agglomeration: history and development opportunities in Kazakhstan. Economics: the strategy and practice, 4 (48), 59-67.

35. Bochko, V. S., & Zakharchuk, E. A. (2020). Individualization of urban development strategies. On the example of Yekaterinburg and Birmingham. Economy of the region, 16(2), 391-405. https://doi.org/10.17059/2020-2-5

36. Post-Pandemic populations. The demographic consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany (2021). [updated August 10, 2021; cited November 27, 2021] Available: /https://population-europe.eu/post-pandemic-populationsdie-demografischen-folgen-der-covid-19-pandemiedeutschland