Preview

Economics: the strategy and practice

Advanced search

The Impact of Energy Transition Risks on the Sustainable Development of Kazakhstan’s Economy

https://doi.org/10.51176/1997-9967-2023-2-135-147

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to determine the prospects and difficulties of Kazakhstan’s energy transition, as well as to analyze the direction of development of the electric power sector to overcome the difficulties that have developed today. The global trends of transition to a carbon-free economy, the foundation for which was laid during the crisis of 2008, are currently being strengthened under the influence of two factors. Firstly, the fact of climate change as a result of anthropogenic impact is recognized by the world community. Secondly, the economic crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic has pushed many states, investors, as well as private companies to more actively implement decarbonization strategies. This is not only due to concern about increasing environmental problems. Decarbonization and energy transition can become an effective tool for stimulating economic development through the development of technology, attracting investment and creating new jobs. The analysis of the consequences of the considered trend for Kazakhstan is carried out. It is shown that the country’s strategic documents reflect a cautious approach based on plans to increase hydrocarbon exports. However, we believe that maintaining this approach is fraught with a number of economic and political risks. According to the results of the study, the importance of developing comprehensive strategic approaches aimed at leveling the identified risks is emphasized, and specific proposals for the implementation of a gradual energy transition in Kazakhstan are formulated. 

About the Authors

B. S. Saubetova
Caspian university of technologies and engineering named after S.Yessenov
Kazakhstan

Bibigul S. Saubetova – Cand. Sc. (Econ.), Acting Associate Professor, Department of Finance

32 microdistrict, R00H6B2, Aktau



G. A. Saimagambetova
Caspian university of technologies and engineering named after S.Yessenov
Russian Federation

Gaukhar A. Saimagambetova – Cand. Sc. (Econ.), Associate Professor

32 microdistrict, R00H6B2, Aktau



A. I. Esturlieva
Caspian university of technologies and engineering named after S.Yessenov
Kazakhstan

Aigul I. Esturlieva – Cand. Sc. (Econ.), Acting Associate Professor

32 microdistrict, R00H6B2, Aktau



G. D. Amaniyazova
Caspian university of technologies and engineering named after S.Yessenov
Russian Federation

Gulimay D. Amaniyazova – Cand. Sc. (Econ.), Professor, Economic department

32 microdistrict, R00H6B2, Aktau



References

1. 2020 Ends earth’s warmest 10 years on record (2021). Met Office. [cited March 6, 2023]. Available at: https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/aboutus/ press-office/news/weather-and-climate/2021/2020-ends-earths-warmest-10-years-on-record

2. Abbas, Q., & Chaudhry, I. S. (2017). 37, No. 1 (2017), pp. 102-113 Environmental Degradation and Economic Development Nexus in Pakistan: A Time Series Analysis. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences, 37(1), 102-113.

3. Abbas, Q., Khan, A. R., Bashir, A., Alemzero, D. A., Sun, H., Iram, R., & Iqbal, N. (2020). Scaling up renewable energy in Africa: measuring wind energy through econometric approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 36282-36294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09596-1

4. Baloch, Z. A., Tan, Q., Iqbal, N., Mohsin, M., Abbas, Q., Iqbal, W., & Chaudhry, I. S. (2020). Trilemma assessment of energy intensity, efficiency, and environmental index: evidence from BRICS countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 34337-34347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09578-3

5. Chaudhry, I.S., Yin, W., Ali, S.A., Faheem, M., Abbas, Q., Farooq, F., & ur Rahman, S. (2021). Moderating role of institutional quality in validation of pollution haven hypothesis in BRICS: a new evidence by using DCCE approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 9193-9202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16087-4

6. From the report of Belousov A.R. (2021). Official website of the Government of the Russian Federation. [cited December 25, 2022]. Available at: http://government.ru/news/43294/#energo (In Russ.)

7. Hao, W., Abbas, Q., Ahmad, I., Alharthi, M., Hanif, I., & Taghizadeh-Hesary, F. (2021). Institutional efficiency and utility reform performance: An evidence from electricity performance in South & East Asia. Economic Analysis and Policy, 72, 549-561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2021.09.013

8. Henderson, J., & Sen, A. (2021). The Energy Transition: Key challenges for incumbent and new players in the global energy system (No. 01). OIES Paper, ET. 9. Hordeski, M. F. (2020). Megatrends for energy efficiency and renewable energy. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003151616

9. Kodaneva, S. I. (2022). Energy transition: Global trends and their consequences for Russia. Contours of global transformations: Politics, Economics, Law, 15(1), 167-185. https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2022-15-1-8 (In Russ.)

10. Kumaran, V.V., Ridzuan, A.R., Khan, F.U., Abdullah, H.B., & Mohamad, Z.Z. (2020). An Empirical Analysis of Factors Affecting Renewable Energy Consumption in Association of Southeast Asian Nations-4 Countries. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 10, 48–56. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.8142

11. Lyu, Y., Ali, S. A., Yin, W., & Kouser, R. (2022). Energy Transition, Sustainable Development Opportunities, and Carbon Emissions Mitigation: Is the Developed World Converging Toward SDGs-2030? Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 1016-1029. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.912479

12. Marshall, H. (2021). Net Zero Targets and GHG Emission Reduction in the UK and Norwegian Upstream Oil and Gas Industry: A Comparative Assessment. The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. [cited March 1, 2023]. Available at: https://www. oxfordenergy.org/publications/net-zerotargets-and-ghgemission-reduction-inthe-uk-and-norwegian-upstreamoil-andgas-industry-a-comparative-assessment

13. Marteau, J. (2021) From Paris to Glasgow and beyond: Towards Kazakhstan’s carbon neutrality by 2060. World Bank. [cited March 6, 2023]. Available at: https://blogs.worldbank.org/europeandcentralasia/paris-glasgow-and-beyond-towards-kazakhstanscarbon-neutrality-2060

14. Razmjoo, A., Kaigutha, L.G., Rad, M.A., Marzband, M., Davarpanah, A., & Denai, M. (2021). A Technical analysis investigating energy sustainability utilizing reliable renewable energy sources to reduce CO2 emissions in a high potential area. Renewable Energy, 164, 46–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.09.042

15. Report (2022). Kazakhstan’s Financial Stability Report 2021. [cited February 15, 2023]. Available at: https://nationalbank.kz/file/download/79672

16. Reuters (2019). Global Companies See Climate Change Hitting Their Bottom Lines in Next 5 Years. [cited March 3, 2023]. Available at: https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/economy/globalcompanies-see-climate-change-hitting-their-bottomlines-innext-5-years/article27433152.ece

17. Roser, M. (2020). Why did renewables become so cheap so fast? And what can we do to use this global opportunity for green growth? Our World in Data. [cited February 26, 2023]. Available at: https://ourworldindata.org/cheap-renewables-growth

18. Shen, H., Ali, S. A., Alharthi, M., Shah, A. S., Basit Khan, A., Abbas, Q., & ur Rahman, S. (2021). Carbon-free energy and sustainable environment: The role of human capital and technological revolutions in attaining SDGs. Sustainability, 13(5), 2636-2655. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052636

19. Specht, J. M., & Madlener, R. (2019). Energy Supplier 2.0: A conceptual business model for energy suppliers aggregating flexible distributed assets and policy issues raised. Energy Policy, 135, 110911-110925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.110911

20. Tracker, C. (2020). Coal developers risk $600 billion as renewables outcompete worldwide, London, New York: Carbon Tracker Initiative. [cited March 6, 2023]. Available at: https://carbontracker.org/coal-developers-risk600-billion-as-renewablesoutcompeteworldwide

21. Wei, G., Asghar, N., Ahmad, I., Yin, W., Abbas, Q., ur Rahman, S., & Farooq, F. (2021). Economic growth, fiscal imbalance, and environmental sustainability: What is desirable and undesirable for developing economies? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(37), 52283-52294. https://doi.org:/10.1007/s11356-021-14379-3

22. Worighi, I., Maach, A., Hafid, A., Hegazy, O., & Van Mierlo, J. (2019). Integrating renewable energy in smart grid system: Architecture, virtualization and analysis. Sustainable Energy, Grids and Networks, 18, 100226-100239. https://doi.org:/10.1016/j.segan.2019.100226

23. Wu, S., Alharthi, M., Yin, W., Abbas, Q., Shah, A. N., Ur Rahman, S., & Khan, J. (2021). The carbon-neutral energy consumption and emission volatility: The causality analysis of asean region. Energies, 14(10), 2943-2958. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14102943

24. Zheng, Zh. (2021). Improving grid interconnection to support climate change mitigation. Oxford Energy Forum. [cited March 3, 2023]. Available at: https://www.oxfordenergy.org/publications/oxford-energy-forum-thegeopolitics-ofenergy-out-with-the-oldand-in-with-the-new-issue-126/


Review

For citations:


Saubetova B.S., Saimagambetova G.A., Esturlieva A.I., Amaniyazova G.D. The Impact of Energy Transition Risks on the Sustainable Development of Kazakhstan’s Economy. Economics: the strategy and practice. 2023;18(2):135-147. https://doi.org/10.51176/1997-9967-2023-2-135-147

Views: 336


ISSN 1997-9967 (Print)
ISSN 2663-550X (Online)