Evaluating Key Drivers of Green Logistics Performance During Economic Growth in African Countries
https://doi.org/10.51176/1997-9967-2024-2-6-19
Abstract
This study evaluates the key drivers of green logistics performance and their impact on economic growth in African countries. The study employs a quantitative approach using panel data analysis for African countries from 2007 to 2022. Impulse Response Function and Variance Decomposition methods are utilized to examine the dynamic relationships among variables, including economic growth, Logistics Performance Indicators (LPI), fossil fuel consumption, and greenhouse gas emissions. The findings reveal significant positive relationships between green logistics performance indicators, such as the ability to track and trace consignments, logistics service quality, and trade infrastructure, with economic growth. Conversely, fossil fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions exhibit negative associations with economic growth and environmental sustainability. The results underscore the importance of embracing green logistics practices and sustainable development strategies in African economies. By improving logistics infrastructure, enhancing service quality, and reducing environmental impacts, countries can foster economic growth while mitigating adverse effects on the environment. Future research could explore region-specific factors influencing green logistics adoption and examine the role of policies and regulations in promoting sustainable practices. The findings have implications for policymakers, industry stakeholders, and regulatory bodies in developing targeted strategies to align economic progress with environmental responsibility in African nations.
About the Authors
A. U. AhmadMalaysia
Ali U. Ahmad – PhD Student, Faculty of Maritime Study, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu.
21030 Kuala Nerus, Terengganu
J. Jeevan
Malaysia
Jagan Jeevan – PhD, Associate Professor, Faculty of Maritime Study, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu.
Terengganu
S. M.M. Ruslan
Malaysia
Siti Marsila M. Ruslan – PhD, Faculty of Maritime Study, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu.
Terengganu
References
1. Ahn, S. K. (1993). Some tests for unit roots in autoregressive-integrated-moving average models with deterministic trends. Biometrika, 80 (4), 855-868. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/80.4.855
2. Amsler, C., & Lee, J. (1995). An LM test for a unit root in the presence of a structural change. Econometric Theory, 11(2), 359-368. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026646660000921X
3. Breitung, J. (2005). A parametric approach to the estimation of cointegration vectors in panel data. Econometric Reviews, 24(2),151-173. https://doi.org/10.1081/ETC-200067895
4. Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. The Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 239. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297111
5. Granger, C. W. (2003). Some aspects of causal relationships. Journal of Econometrics, 112(1), 69-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(02)00148-3
6. Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986-1014. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9512280033
7. International Energy Agency (2022). Africa Energy Outlook 2022. Paris, IEA Publications. https://doi.org/10.1787/2abd9ce2-en
8. Karaman, A.S., Kılıç, M., & Uyar, A. (2020). Green logistics performance and sustainability reporting practices of the logistics sector: The moderating effect of corporate governance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 258, 120718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120718
9. Khan, S. A. R., & Qianli, D. (2017). Does national scale economic and environmental indicators spur logistics performance? Evidence from UK. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24, 26692-26705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0222-9
10. Khan, S. A. R., Zhang, Y., Anees, M., Golpîra, H., Lahmar, A., & Qianli, D. (2018). Green supply chain management, economic growth and environment: A GMM based evidence. Journal of Cleaner Production, 185, 588-599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle-pro.2018.02.226
11. Le, T. H., Nguyen, H. K., & Nguyen, T. L. (2022). Impact of Green Logistics on International Trade: An Empirical Study in Asia–Pacific Economic Cooperation. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 12(4), 97-105. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijefi.13185
12. Li, X., Sohail, S., Majeed, M. T., & Ahmad, W. (2021). Green logistics, economic growth, and environmental quality: evidence from one belt and road initiative economies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 30664-30674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12839-4
13. Markley, M. J., & Davis, L. (2007). Exploring future competitive advantage through sustainable supply chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 37(9), 763-774. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030710840859
14. Pesaran, H. H., & Shin, Y. (1998). Generalized impulse response analysis in linear multivariate models. Economics Letters, 58(1), 17-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(97)00214-0
15. Sims, C. A. (1980). Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica, 48(1), 1-48. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912017
16. Pesaran, M.H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross-sectional dependence in panels. Empirical Economics, 60, 13 - 50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-020-01875-7
17. Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265-312. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.457280
18. Rao, P., & Holt, D. (2005). Do green supply chains lead to competitiveness and economic performance? International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25(9), 898-916. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570510613956
19. Rodrigue, J. P., Comtois, C., & Slack, B. (2017). The geography of transport systems (4th ed.). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315618159
20. Schmidt, P., & Phillips, P. C. (1992). LM tests for a unit root in the presence of deterministic trends. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 54(3), 257-287. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1468-0084.1992.TB00002.X
21. Seroka-Stolka, O., & Ociepa-Kubicka, A. (2019). Green logistics and circular economy. Transportation Research Procedia, 39, 471-479. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRPRO.2019.06.049
22. Sims, C. A. (1980). Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica, 48(1), 1-48. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912017
23. Swamy, P. A. V. B. (1970). Efficient inference in a random coefficient regression model. Econometrica, 38(2), 311-323. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913012
24. Tseng, Y. Y., Yue, W. L., & Taylor, M. A. (2005). The role of transportation in logistics chain. Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 5, 1657-1672.
25. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2021). Emissions Gap Report 2021. Available at: https://www.unep.org/resources/emissions-gap-report-2021 (Accessed May 30, 2024).
26. Westerlund, J., & Edgerton, D. L. (2007). A panel bootstrap cointegration test. Economics Letters, 97(3), 185-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECON-LET.2007.03.003
27. Wu, H. J., & Dunn, S. C. (1995). Environmentally responsible logistics systems. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 25(2), 20-38. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600039510083925
28. Yingfei, Y., Mengze, Z., Zeyu, L., Ki-Hyung, B., Avotra, A. A. R. N., & Nawaz, A. (2022). Green logistics performance and infrastructure on service trade and environment-measuring firm’s performance and service quality. Journal of King Saud University-Science, 34(1), 101683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2021.101683
29. Yu, Z., Golpira, H., & Khan, S. A. R. (2018). The relationship between green supply chain performance, energy demand, economic growth and environmental sustainability: An empirical evidence from developed countries. LogForum, 14(4), 479-494. http://dx.doi.org/10.17270/J.LOG.2018.304
Review
For citations:
Ahmad A.U., Jeevan J., Ruslan S.M. Evaluating Key Drivers of Green Logistics Performance During Economic Growth in African Countries. Economy: strategy and practice. 2024;19(2):6-19. https://doi.org/10.51176/1997-9967-2024-2-6-19