Unveiling the Strategic Significance of the Middle Corridor in Global Trade and Geopolitical Dynamics

This study aims to elucidate the role of the Middle Corridor, also known as the Trans-Caspian International Transport Route (TITR), in diversifying global trade routes and enhancing economic resilience amid geopolitical tensions. The paper examines the corridor's impact on the economic and strategic interests of the countries it traverses, particularly Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan, Turkey, and the European Union. The analysis employs a multidimensional approach that includes historical context analysis, comparative route analysis, geographic information system mapping, and statistical analysis. Data were collected from various sources, including the World Bank, the International Trade Centre, and trade and economic policy reports from Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan, Turkey, and the European Union databases. Based on the methods used, the study compares the Middle Corridor with traditional trade routes such as the Northern Sea Route and the Suez Canal, highlighting its advantages and potential limitations. The Middle Corridor has emerged as a vital alternative, offering reduced transit times and enhanced trade security between Asia and Europe. The corridor has experienced a significant increase in cargo volume, reflecting its growing importance in international trade. Furthermore, the Middle Corridor contributes to the participating countries' economic diversification and energy security, facilitating the movement of energy resources and other goods. The analysis revealed challenges such as political instability and infrastructural needs that could hinder the full potential of the Middle Corridor. Ultimately, the study underscores the strategic significance of the Trans-Caspian Route and the Zangezur Corridor in diversifying global trade routes and strengthening economic resilience in geopolitical tensions.

1. Abbasova, V. (2023). Kazakhstan is ready to ramp up oil shipments via Azerbaijan. https://caspiannews.com/news-detail/kazakhstan-ready-to-ramp-up-oil-shipments-via-azerbaijan-2023-11-14-37

2. Abramson, S. (2017). The Economic Origins of the Territorial State. International Organization. 71(1), 97-130. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818316000308

3. Agaev, I. G. Interests of regional and world powers in the opening of the Zangezur corridor. Institute of Scientific Information on Social Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, P 13-18. (In Russ)

4. Akaev, A.A., & Pantin, V.I. (2018). Central Asia as the economic and geopolitical tension nexus: Some implications for the world futures. World Futures, 74, 36-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/02604027.2017.1357963

5. ADBI Institute (2021). Trade Corridors in the Caspian Region: Present and Future. Tokyo, ADBI Working Paper Series.

6. Ali, T. (2023, August 29). CPC | Hungary Signs Breakthrough Energy Deals with Caspian Leaders. Caspian Policy Center. https://www.caspianpolicy.org/research/energy-and-economy-program-eep/hungary-signs-break-through-energy-deals-with-caspian-leaders

7. Barkanyi, P., & Vasa, L. (2023). The Revival of Regional Cooperation in Central Asia in the Perspective of Hungary's Eastern Opening Policy. Economic and Regional Studies / Studia Ekonomiczne i Regionalne, 16 (2), 241 - 256. https://doi.org/10.2478/ers-2023-0016

8. Blanchard, J.F., & Flint, C. (2017). The Geopolitics of China's Maritime Silk Road Initiative. Geopolitics, 22 (2), 223 - 245. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2017.1291503

9. Bussières, P (2023). The Middle Corridor: A Geopolitical Game-Changer in Eurasian Trade Geopolitical Monitor. Geopolitical Monitor. https://www.geopoliticalmonitor.com/the-middle-corridor-a-geopolitical-game-changer-in-eurasian-trade/

10. Çinar, E.M., Johnson, J., & Geusz, K. (2016). Estimating Chinese Trade Relationships with the Silk Road Countries. Institutions & Transition Economics: Macroeconomic Issues eJournal, 24(1), 85-103. https://doi.org/10.1111/cwe.12145

11. Dubnov, A. (2024). What the new status of the Caspian will change. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. https://carnegiemoscow.org/commentary/77078

12. Eurasian Research Institute (2021). Economic Cooperation between Central Asia and the European Union. https://www.eurasian-research.org/publication/economic-cooperation-between-central-asia-and-the-european-union

13. European Commission (2023). An EU approach to enhance economic security. European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_23_3358

14. Eurostat (2024). China-EU - international trade in goods statistic. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=China-EU_-_international_trade_in_goods_statistics

15. Frankopan, P (2016). The Silk Roads: A New History of the World. New York, Alfred Knopf.

16. Gawliczek, P., & Iskandarov, K. (2023). The Zangezur corridor as part of the global transport route (against the backdrop of power games in the South Caucasus region). Security and Defence Quarterly, 41(1), 36-53. https://doi.org/10.35467/sdq%2F161993

17. Iskandarov, K., Simons, G., & Gawliczek, P. (2019). The South Caucasus: Stage for a ‘New Great Game' between NATO and Russia? Connections: The Quarterly Journal, 18(3-4), 7-34. https://doi.org/10.11610/connections.18.3-4.01

18. Karimov, S.I. (2024). Political Opportunities and Risks of Opening the Zangezur Corridor, Its Role in Increasing Transport Connectivity in the South Caucasus. Society: Politics, Economics, Law, 4, 41-46. https://doi.org/10.24158/pep.2024.4.6 (in Russ)

19. Koishibayev, Y. (2022). Transit and Transport Cooperation between Kazakhstan and the European Union: Prospects for the Development of the Middle Corridor. [Online] https://middlecorridor.com/en/press-center/news/the-prospects-for-the-development-of-middle-corridor-were-discussed-in-brussels

20. Li, Y, & Schmerer, H. (2017). Trade and the New Silk Road: opportunities, challenges, and solutions. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, 15(3), 205-213. https://doi.org/10.1080/14765284.2017.1347473

21. Lukacs, E. & Volgyi, K. (2018). China-Hungary economic under OBOR. China-CEE Institute Working Paper, No.37. https://china-cee.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Work_paper-201837-Eszter-Luk%C3%A1cs-KatalinV%C3%B6lgyi.pdf

22. Millward, J. (2007). Eurasian Crossroads: A His-tory of Xinjiang. New York, Columbia University Press.

23. Moldicz, C. (2023). Hungary external relations briefing: The development of Hungarian-Chinese relations in 2023 - China-CEE Institute. Weekly Briefing, 63(4). https://china-cee.eu/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/2023er06_Hungary.pdf

24. Railway Pro (2022, June 3). First Middle Corridor train arrives in Hungary from China. Railway PRO. https://www.railwaypro.com/wp/grampet-organises-china-hungary-train-on-middle-corridor

25. Reeves, J. (2018). China's Silk Road Economic Belt Initiative: Network and Influence Formation in Central Asia. Journal of Contemporary China, 27, 502 - 518. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2018.1433480

26. Satubaldina, A. (2023). Turkic integration gains momentum as OTS summit concludes in Astana - The Astana Times. The Astana Times. https://astana-times.com/2023/11/turkic-integration-gains-momentum-as-ots-summit-concludes-in-astana

27. Trenin, D.V. (2012). True Partners? How Russia and China See Each Other, Centre for European Reform.

28. Vinokurov, E.Y., Ahunbaev, A., & Zaboev, A.I. (2022). International North-South Transport Corridor: Boosting Russia's “pivot to the South” and Trans-Eurasian connectivity. Russian Journal of Economics, 8(2), 159-173. https://doi.org/10.32609/j.ruje.8.86617

29. World Bank Group (2024). The Middle Trade and Transport Corridor: policies and investments to triple freight volumes and halve travel time by 2030. In World Bank. https://www.worldbank.org/en/region/eca/publication/middle-trade-and-transport-corridor

30. Zhang, B., Nadyrov, S., Sorokina, N., & Chaynikova, L. (2023). Role of the Silk Road Economic Belt in Achieving Sustainable Economic Growth in Central Asia. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(2), e385. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i2.385