Әлемдік сауда мен геосаяси динамикадағы орта дәліздің стратегиялық маңызы

Данное исследование направлено на выяснение роли Среднего Коридора, также известного как Транскаспийский международный транспортный маршрут (ТМТМ), в диверсификации глобальных торговых путей и повышении экономической устойчивости на фоне геополитических напряженностей. Оно рассматривает влияние коридора на экономические и стратегические интересы стран, через которые он проходит, особенно Казахстана, Азербайджана, Турции и Европейского Союза. Анализ основан на многомерном подходе, который объединяет исторические данные, текущие геополитические стратегии и экономическую статистику для оценки значимости Среднего Коридора. На основе используемых методов, исследование проводит сравнение Среднего Коридора с традиционными торговыми маршрутами, такими как Северный морской путь и Суэцкий канал, выделяя его преимущества и потенциальные ограничения. Средний Коридор выявился как важная альтернатива, предлагая сокращение времени транзита и повышение безопасности торговли между Азией и Европой. Коридор наблюдает значительное увеличение объема грузов, что отражает его растущее значение в международной торговле. Кроме того, Средний коридор способствует экономической диверсификации и энергетической безопасности участвующих стран, облегчая перемещение энергетических ресурсов и других товаров. Анализ показал, что имеются проблемы, как политическая нестабильность и инфраструктурные потребности, которые могут препятствовать полному использованию потенциала Среднего Коридора. В итоге, исследование подчеркивает стратегическую значимость Транскаспийского маршрута и Коридора Зангезур в диверсификации мировых торговых путей и укреплении экономической устойчивости в условиях геополитических напряжений.

1. Abbasova, V. (2023). Kazakhstan is ready to ramp up oil shipments via Azerbaijan. https://caspiannews.com/news-detail/kazakhstan-ready-to-ramp-up-oil-shipments-via-azerbaijan-2023-11-14-37

2. Abramson, S. (2017). The Economic Origins of the Territorial State. International Organization. 71(1), 97-130. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818316000308

3. Agaev, I. G. Interests of regional and world powers in the opening of the Zangezur corridor. Institute of Scientific Information on Social Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, P 13-18. (In Russ)

4. Akaev, A.A., & Pantin, V.I. (2018). Central Asia as the economic and geopolitical tension nexus: Some implications for the world futures. World Futures, 74, 36-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/02604027.2017.1357963

5. ADBI Institute (2021). Trade Corridors in the Caspian Region: Present and Future. Tokyo, ADBI Working Paper Series.

6. Ali, T. (2023, August 29). CPC | Hungary Signs Breakthrough Energy Deals with Caspian Leaders. Caspian Policy Center. https://www.caspianpolicy.org/research/energy-and-economy-program-eep/hungary-signs-break-through-energy-deals-with-caspian-leaders

7. Barkanyi, P., & Vasa, L. (2023). The Revival of Regional Cooperation in Central Asia in the Perspective of Hungary's Eastern Opening Policy. Economic and Regional Studies / Studia Ekonomiczne i Regionalne, 16 (2), 241 - 256. https://doi.org/10.2478/ers-2023-0016

8. Blanchard, J.F., & Flint, C. (2017). The Geopolitics of China's Maritime Silk Road Initiative. Geopolitics, 22 (2), 223 - 245. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2017.1291503

9. Bussières, P (2023). The Middle Corridor: A Geopolitical Game-Changer in Eurasian Trade Geopolitical Monitor. Geopolitical Monitor. https://www.geopoliticalmonitor.com/the-middle-corridor-a-geopolitical-game-changer-in-eurasian-trade/

10. Çinar, E.M., Johnson, J., & Geusz, K. (2016). Estimating Chinese Trade Relationships with the Silk Road Countries. Institutions & Transition Economics: Macroeconomic Issues eJournal, 24(1), 85-103. https://doi.org/10.1111/cwe.12145

11. Dubnov, A. (2024). What the new status of the Caspian will change. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. https://carnegiemoscow.org/commentary/77078

12. Eurasian Research Institute (2021). Economic Cooperation between Central Asia and the European Union. https://www.eurasian-research.org/publication/economic-cooperation-between-central-asia-and-the-european-union

13. European Commission (2023). An EU approach to enhance economic security. European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_23_3358

14. Eurostat (2024). China-EU - international trade in goods statistic. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=China-EU_-_international_trade_in_goods_statistics

15. Frankopan, P (2016). The Silk Roads: A New History of the World. New York, Alfred Knopf.

16. Gawliczek, P., & Iskandarov, K. (2023). The Zangezur corridor as part of the global transport route (against the backdrop of power games in the South Caucasus region). Security and Defence Quarterly, 41(1), 36-53. https://doi.org/10.35467/sdq%2F161993

17. Iskandarov, K., Simons, G., & Gawliczek, P. (2019). The South Caucasus: Stage for a ‘New Great Game' between NATO and Russia? Connections: The Quarterly Journal, 18(3-4), 7-34. https://doi.org/10.11610/connections.18.3-4.01

18. Karimov, S.I. (2024). Political Opportunities and Risks of Opening the Zangezur Corridor, Its Role in Increasing Transport Connectivity in the South Caucasus. Society: Politics, Economics, Law, 4, 41-46. https://doi.org/10.24158/pep.2024.4.6 (in Russ)

19. Koishibayev, Y. (2022). Transit and Transport Cooperation between Kazakhstan and the European Union: Prospects for the Development of the Middle Corridor. [Online] https://middlecorridor.com/en/press-center/news/the-prospects-for-the-development-of-middle-corridor-were-discussed-in-brussels

20. Li, Y, & Schmerer, H. (2017). Trade and the New Silk Road: opportunities, challenges, and solutions. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, 15(3), 205-213. https://doi.org/10.1080/14765284.2017.1347473

21. Lukacs, E. & Volgyi, K. (2018). China-Hungary economic under OBOR. China-CEE Institute Working Paper, No.37. https://china-cee.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Work_paper-201837-Eszter-Luk%C3%A1cs-KatalinV%C3%B6lgyi.pdf

22. Millward, J. (2007). Eurasian Crossroads: A His-tory of Xinjiang. New York, Columbia University Press.

23. Moldicz, C. (2023). Hungary external relations briefing: The development of Hungarian-Chinese relations in 2023 - China-CEE Institute. Weekly Briefing, 63(4). https://china-cee.eu/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/2023er06_Hungary.pdf

24. Railway Pro (2022, June 3). First Middle Corridor train arrives in Hungary from China. Railway PRO. https://www.railwaypro.com/wp/grampet-organises-china-hungary-train-on-middle-corridor

25. Reeves, J. (2018). China's Silk Road Economic Belt Initiative: Network and Influence Formation in Central Asia. Journal of Contemporary China, 27, 502 - 518. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2018.1433480

26. Satubaldina, A. (2023). Turkic integration gains momentum as OTS summit concludes in Astana - The Astana Times. The Astana Times. https://astana-times.com/2023/11/turkic-integration-gains-momentum-as-ots-summit-concludes-in-astana

27. Trenin, D.V. (2012). True Partners? How Russia and China See Each Other, Centre for European Reform.

28. Vinokurov, E.Y., Ahunbaev, A., & Zaboev, A.I. (2022). International North-South Transport Corridor: Boosting Russia's “pivot to the South” and Trans-Eurasian connectivity. Russian Journal of Economics, 8(2), 159-173. https://doi.org/10.32609/j.ruje.8.86617

29. World Bank Group (2024). The Middle Trade and Transport Corridor: policies and investments to triple freight volumes and halve travel time by 2030. In World Bank. https://www.worldbank.org/en/region/eca/publication/middle-trade-and-transport-corridor

30. Zhang, B., Nadyrov, S., Sorokina, N., & Chaynikova, L. (2023). Role of the Silk Road Economic Belt in Achieving Sustainable Economic Growth in Central Asia. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(2), e385. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i2.385