Затраты на НИОКР и их влияние на инновационную деятельность в цифровую эпоху: опыт Казахстана

Цель статьи заключается в оценке взаимосвязи между затратами на научно-исследовательские и опытно-конструкторские работы (НИОКР) и уровнем инновационной активности предприятий в Казахстане. Методология исследования включает корреляционный анализ, применяющий количественные методы для анализа данных, собранных из официальных статистических ежегодников за период с 2007 по 2022 гг. Корреляционный анализ пяти переменных, связанных с инновационной активностью и влиянием затрат на НИОКР, был проведен с использованием программ Excel и Smart PLS 4. Согласно результатам исследования, было установлено положительное влияние расходов на НИОКР на уровень инновационной активности предприятий, а также на долю инновационной продукции в валовом внутреннем продукте, объем инновационной продукции (товары, услуги), при этом наблюдалась менее сильная корреляция с затратами на продуктовые и процессные инновации. Было выявлено, что цифровые хабы выступают в роли экосистем с сетевым подходом, включая организации региона для осуществления цифровой трансформации в условиях цифровой экономики и цифровых технологий. В целом, результаты данного исследования могут быть полезны как для академического сообщества, так и для органов государственного управления. Оригинальность исследования заключается в оценке влияния затрат на НИОКР на управление инновациями, в частности на уровень инновационной активности, долю инновационной продукции в ВВП, затраты на продуктовые и процессные инновации, объем инновационной продукции (товары, услуги), что является основой для последующих исследований.  В итоге, рекомендуется сосредоточиться на улучшении цифровой инфраструктуры и поддержке инвестиций в НИОКР для обеспечения устойчивой инновационной деятельности и экономического развития.

1. Akçalı, B.Y., & Şişmanoğlu, E. (2015). Innovation and the Effect of Research and Development (R&D) Expenditure on Growth in Some Developing and Developed Countries. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 768-775. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2015.06.474

2. Azagra-Caro, J. M., & Consoli, D. (2014). Knowledge flows, the influence of national R&D structure and the moderating role of public–private cooperation. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41, 152–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-014-9382-7

3. Bednar, P., & Halaskova, M. (2018). Innovation Performance and R&D Expenditures in Western European Regions: Divergence or Convergence? Journal of International Studies, 11(1), 210-224. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2018/11-1/16

4. Becker, B. (2014). Public R&D Policies and Private R&D Investment: A Survey of the Empirical Evidence. Journal of Economic Surveys, 29(5), 917-942. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12074

5. Belluci, A., & Pennacchio, L. (2015). University knowledge and firm innovation: evidence from European countries. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41, 730–752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-015-9408-9

6. Bor, J. Y., Chuang, Y. C., Lai, W. W., & Yang, M. C. (2012). A Dynamic General Equilibrium Model For Public R&D Investment in Taiwan. Economic Modelling, 27(1), 171-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2009.08.007

7. Bruothová, M., Hintošová, A. B., & Hliboká, L. (2014). Innovation activity and enterprises´ size. European journal of management, 1 (1). http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/CEJM2014-1-1

8. Chandy, R. K., & Tellis, G. J. (2000). The incumbent´s curse? Incumbency, size and radical product innovation. Journal of Marketing, 64(3), 1–17.

9. Coe, D., & Helpman, E. (1995). International R&D Spillovers. European Economic Review, 39(1), 859-887. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(94)00100-E

10. Cohen, W. M., & Klepper, S. (1996). A reprise of size and R&D. The Economic Journal, 106(437), 925–951.

11. Damanpour, F. (1992). Organizational size and innovation. Organization Studies, 13(3), 402-407.

12. Damanpour, F. (2010). An integration of research findings of effects of firm size and market competition on product and process innovations. British Journal of Management, 21(4), 996–1010.

13. European commission (2020). Shaping Europe’s Digital Future Policy. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024/europe-fit-digital-age/shaping-europe-digital-future_en (Accessed November 2, 2023)

14. European Commission (2019). The need for digitalization technology. Eurostat Report. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/digital-innovation-hubs-helping-companies-across-economy-make-most-digital-opportunities (Accessed November 2, 2023)

15. European Digital Progress Report (2016). Digital-single-market. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/european-digital-progress-report (Accessed November 3, 2023)

16. Ferencz, V., & Dugas, J. (2012). Management of Innovation. Brussels: EuroScientia.

17. Fritsch, M., & Meschede, M. (2001). Product innovation, process innovation, and size. Review of Industrial Organization, 19(3), 335–350.

18. Garcia, M. M., Zouaghi, F., & Garcia Marco, T. (2017). Diversity is strategy: The effect of R&D team diversity on innovative performance. R&D Management, 47(2), 311–329. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12244

19. George, D. & Mallery, P. (2019). IBM SPSS Statistics 26 Step by Step a Simple Guide and Reference (16th Ed.). New York, USA, Routledge.

20. Fagerberg, J. (2002). Technology, Growth and Competitiveness. Cheltenham, UK, Edward Elgar.

21. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (3 ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage.

22. Hall, B. H., Lotti, F., & Mairesse, J. (2012). Evidence on the impact of R&D and ICT investments on innovation and productivity in Italian firms. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 22(3), 300–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2012.708134

23. Jaffe, A. (1986). Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: Evidence from firms’ patents, profits and market value. The American Economic Review, 76(5), 984–1001.

24. Julio R.G., Jens S. (2018). Digital Innovation Hubs in Smart Specialisation Strategies. Research Papers in Economics. https://doi.org.10.2760/475335

25. Karatheodoros, A., Staikouras, Ch., & Tsamadias, C. (2019). The Effect of R&D Expenditure on Innovation in the Regions of Greece. Εκπαίδευση, Δια Βίου Μάθηση, Έρευνα και Τεχνολογική Ανάπτυξη, Καινοτομία και

26. Οικονομία, 2, 701-712. https://doi.org/10.12681/elrie.1578

27. Kučera, J., & Fiľa, M. (2022). R&D expenditure, innovation performance and economic development of the EU countries. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 9(3), 227-421. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2022.9.3(14)

28. Li, A. (2017). Research on the Effect of Public R&D Subsidies on R&D Investment Expenditure of Technological Innovation Enterprises. Proceedings of 3rd International Symposium on Social Science (ISSS), 61, 482-488.

29. Lichtenberg, F. R. (1992). R&D investment and international productivity differences. NBER Working Paper N. 4161.

30. Love, J. H., & Ashcroft, B. (1999). Market versus corporate structure in plant-level innovation performance. Small Business Economics, 13(2), 97–109.

31. McNulty, P. J. (1974). On firm size and innovation in the Schumpeterian system. Journal of Economic Issues, 8(3), 627–632.

32. Nursoy, M., Bazhirov, K. N., Markhaeva, B. A., & Bazhirov, T. S. (2012). An Innovative Project Management Model for Technological Development of an Enterprise. Theoretical Foundations of Chemical Engineering, 46(6), 618-620. https://doi.org/10.1134/s0040579512050156

33. OECD (2015). Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development. The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities, OECD Publishing, Paris, France. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264239012-en

34. Öztürk, Ç. Ö., & Oransay, G. (2017). Economic Growth and Dynamic R&D Investment Behavior. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44591-5_17

35. Pegkas, P., Staikouras, C., & Tsamadias, C. (2019). Does research and development expenditure impact innovation? Evidence from the European Union countries. Journal of Policy Modeling, 41(5), 1005-1025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2019.07.001

36. Peng, L. (2010). Study on Relationship Between R&D Expenditure and Economic Growth of China. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Innovation & Management, 1725-1728.

37. Pessoa, A. (2010). R&D And Economic Growth: How Strong İs The Link? Economic Letters, 107(1), 152154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2010.01.010

38. Porter, M., & Stern, S. (2000). Measuring the ‘‘Ideas’’ production function: evidence from international patent output. NBER Working Paper 7891.

39. Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing Returns and LongRun Growth. The Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 1002-1037. https://doi.org/10.1086/261420

40. Romer, P. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(05), 71-102. https://doi.org/10.1086/261725

41. Sarraipa, J., Zamiri, M., Marcelino-Jesus, E., Artifice, A., Jardim-Goncalves, R., & Moalla, N. (2023). A Learning Framework for Supporting Digital Innovation Hubs. Computers, 12(6), 122. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/computers12060122

42. Sassanelli, C., Sergio, T., Hervé, P., & Guy, D. (2021). Digital Innovation Hubs supporting SMEs digital transformation. 27th IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation, ICE/ITMC 2021, Jun 2021, Cardiff, United Kingdom, p.1-8. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE/ITMC52061.2021.9570273.hal-03270685

43. Steinberg, P. J., Procher, V. D., & Urbig, D. (2017). Too much or too little of R&D offshoring: The impact of captive offshoring and contract offshoring on innovation performance. Research Policy, 46(10), 1810–1823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.08.008

44. Szarowská, I., (2017). Does public R&D expenditure matter for economic growth? GMM approach. Journal of International Studies, 10(2), 90-103. https://doi.org/:10.14254/2071-8330.2017/10-2/6

45. Szarowská, I. (2018). Importance of R&D expenditure for economic growth in selected CEE countries. E+M Ekonomie a Management, 21(4), 108-124. https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2018-4-008

46. Trajtenberg, M. (1990). Economic Analysis of product innovation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

47. Ujwary-Gil, A., & Florek-Paszkowska, A. (2022). Network Approach to the Digital Innovation Hub as an Ecosystem Supporting the Digital Transformation of Enterprises in a Region. European Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship (Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 557-566).

48. Ujwary-Gil, A., & Godlewska-Dzioboń, B. (2022). Digital Innovation Hubs: Two-mode and Network-Based View on Technology and Services Provided. European Conference on Knowledge Management (Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 1202-1211).

49. Usai, A., Fiano, F., Petruzzelli, A. M., Paoloni, P., Briamonte, M. F., & Orlando, B. (2021). Unveiling the impact of the adoption of digital technologies on firms’ innovation performance. Journal of Business Research, 133, 327–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUS-RES.2021.04.035

50. Voutsinas, I., Tsamadias, C., Carayannis, E., & Staikouras, Ch. (2018). Does research and development expenditure impact innovation? theory, policy and practice insights from the Greek experience. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 43(1), 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-015-9454-3

51. Wang, E.C. (2007). R&D Efficiency and Economic Performance: A Cross-Country Analysis Using the Stochastic Frontier Approach. Journal of Policy Modeling, 29(2), 345-360. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2006.12.005

52. Wintjes, R., & Vargas, F. (2023). Digital Innovation Hubs: Insights from European Experience in Supporting Business Digitalization. Technical Report. https://doi.org/10.18235/0004995

53. Yellapu, V. (2018). Descriptive statistics. International Journal of Academic Medicine, 4(1), 60-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/IJAM.IJAM_7_18

54. Yi, J., Hong, J., chung Hsu, W., & Wang, C. (2017). The role of state ownership and institutions in the innovation performance of emerging market. Technovation, 62, 4-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHNOVA-TION.2017.04.002

55. Zouaghi, F., Sánchez, M., & Martínez, M. G. (2018). Did the global financial crisis impact firms’ innovation performance? The role of internal and external knowledge capabilities in high- and low-tech industries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 132, 92– 104. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHFORE.2018.01.011