Sustaining Innovation and Regulation: The Eco-System of Decentralized and Centralized Finance

This study examines the ongoing debate between Decentralized Finance (DeFi) and Centralized Finance (CeFi), analysing their unique advantages and challenges within the rapidly evolving financial landscape. The objective of this research is to argue for the convergence of DeFi and CeFi to create an innovative and secure financial ecosystem that balances accessibility with security, using Kazakhstan as a case study. The study employs comparative analysis and case-study methodology to explore Kazakhstan’s regulatory approach to digital assets. The focus is on understanding how licensing, anti-money laundering (AML) protocols, and consumer protection measures can support the integration of DeFi and CeFi. Primary data includes an analysis of Kazakhstan’s regulatory framework for digital assets, statistical data on AML implementation, and levels of consumer protection within the country. Findings indicate that a hybrid regulatory model effectively bridges the operational differences between DeFi and CeFi, fostering inclusivity and economic growth while safeguarding consumer interests. Kazakhstan’s regulatory focus on licensing and AML protocols illustrates that a balanced regulatory approach can accommodate both technological progress and necessary protections for financial participants. The study concludes that a convergence of DeFi and CeFi through a hybrid regulatory model can lay the foundation for a sustainable digital financial environment that is accessible, innovative, and secure. Future studies are encouraged to explore the role of emerging technologies, such as quantum computing, and examine the socio-economic impacts of DeFiCeFi integration on financial inclusivity for underserved populations.

1. Adrian, T., & Mancini-Griffoli, T. (2019). The Rise of Digital Money. Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781498324908.063

2. Akcinaroglu, S., & Shi, M. (2023). Exploring the Impact of Cryptocurrency on Terrorism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2023.2275057

3. Alimzhanova, Z., Skublewska-Paszkowska, M., & Nazarbayev, D. (2023). Periodicity Detection of the Substitution Box in the CBC Mode of Operation: Experiment and Study. IEEE Access, 11, 75686-75695. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3295909

4. Bajpai, A.B. (2024). How Digital Finance and Fintech Can Improve Financial Inclusion? International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology, 4(1), 544-559. https://doi.org/10.48175/ijarsct-16987

5. Beisembay, Y., & Ernazarov, T. Y. (2021). Modern trends in the formation of economic and organizational foundations for the construction and development of the digital economy in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Economy: strategy and practice, 16(1), 93-105. https://doi.org/10.51176/JESP/vol_16_issue_1_T6

6. Benarous, A. M., Medeni, I. T., Medeni, T. D., & Ateş, V. (2024). Blockchain dynamic and macroeconomic impact on the stock market. Economy: strategy and practice, 19(2), 58-69. https://doi.org/10.51176/1997-9967-2024-2-58-69

7. Bordo, M. D., & Levin, A. T. (2017). Central bank digital currency and the future of monetary policy. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w23711

8. Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods. Oxford University Press.

9. Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance. (2019). Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index (CBECI). [cited October 15, 2024]. Available at: https://cbeci.org https://www.jbs.cam.ac.uk/2019/cambridge-bitcoin-electricity-consumption-index-cbeci/

10. Casey, M., Crane, J., Gensler, G., Johnson, S., & Narula, N. (2018). The impact of blockchain technology on finance: A catalyst for change. [cited October 15, 2024]. Available at: https://cepr.org/publications/booksand-reports/geneva-21-impact-blockchain-technology-finance-catalyst-change

11. Chainalysis. (2024). Reports on cryptocurrency crime and adoption. [cited October 15, 2024]. Available at: https://www.chainalysis.com

12. Coin ATM Radar (2024). Number of Bitcoin ATMs worldwide from October 2013 to April 2024. In Statista. [cited October 15, 2024]. Available at: https://wwwstatista-com.liverpool.idm.oclc.org/statistics/343127/number-bitcoin-atms/

13. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. London: Sage Publications.

14. Crosby, M., Nachiappan, Pattanayak, P., Verma, S., & Kalyanaraman, V. (2016). Blockchain technology: Beyond Bitcoin. Applied Innovation Review, 2, 6-19. https://scet.berkeley.edu/wp-content/uploads/AIR-2016-Blockchain.pdf

15. Deloitte. (2020). Deloitte’s perspectives on quantum computing and cryptography. [cited October 15, 2024]. Available at: https://www2.deloitte.com

16. Denzin, N. K. (2017). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315134543

17. Demirgüç-Kunt, A., Klapper, L., Singer, D., Ansar, S. & Hess, J. (2018). The Global Findex Database 2017: Measuring financial inclusion and the fintech revolution. World Bank Group. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-46481259-0

18. Digiconomist. (2023). Bitcoin average energy consumption per transaction compared to that of VISA as of May 1, 2023 (in kilowatt-hours). In Statista. [cited October 15, 2024]. Available at: https://www-statista-com.liverpool.idm.oclc.org/statistics/881541/bitcoin-energy-consumption-transaction-comparison-visa/

19. Dingle, S. (2018). In math, we trust Bitcoin, cryptocurrency and the journey to being your own bank. Tracey McDonald Publishers.

20. Dingle, S., & Sidley S.B. (2022). Beyond Bitcoin: Decentralized finance and the end of banks. Icon Books.

21. Eisenberg, L., & Noe, T. H. (2001). Systemic risk in financial systems. Management Science, 47(2), 236-249. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.47.2.236.9835

22. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550. https://doi.org/10.2307/258557

23. Estecahandy, H. (2024). Geopolitics of cryptocurrency mining in Kazakhstan. Central Asian Survey, 43(3), 327–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/02634937.2024.2324192

24. Ethereum Foundation. (2022). The Merge: Ethereum’s transition to proof of stake. [cited October 15, 2024]. Available at: https://ethereum.org/en/roadmap/merge

25. EPCEU. (2016). Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data. Official Journal of the European Union, L119, 1-88. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj

26. Fernandez-Carames, T. M., & Fraga-Lamas, P. (2020). Towards post-quantum blockchain: A review on blockchain cryptography resistant to quantum computing attacks. IEEE Access, 8, 21091-21116. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2968985

27. FATF. (2021). Annual report 2020-2021. FATF-GAFI. [cited October 15, 2024]. Available at: https://www.fatf-gafi.org/content/dam/fatf-gafi/annual-reports/Annual-Report-2020-2021.pdf

28. Fu, S., Wang, Q., Yu, J., Chen, S. (2024). FTX Collapse: A Ponzi Story. In: Essex, A., et al. Financial Cryptography and Data Security. FC 2023 International Workshops. FC 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 13953, Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3031-48806-1_14

29. Glassnode. (2022). DeFi participation and sector volatility in the 2022 bear market. [cited October 15, 2024]. Available at: https://glassnode.com

30. Goetzmann, W.N. (2016). Money changes everything: How finance made civilization possible. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

31. Gramlich, V., Guggenberger, T., Principato, M., Schellinger, B., & Urbach, N. (2023). A multivocal literature review of decentralized finance: Current knowledge and future research avenues. Electronic Markets, 33(11). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-023-00637-4

32. Gumar, N. A., Zhanibekova, G. K., Imramziyeva, M. Y., Kabdeshova, A. A., & Isaeva, A. T. (2023). The impact of digital technologies on the efficiency of banking. Economy: strategy and practice, 18(3), 241–250. https://doi.org/10.51176/1997-9967-2023-3-241-250

33. Kaiyp, D.T., Zhartybayeva, M. G., & Oralbekova, Z. O. (2023). Methodological basis and experience of using data mining methods in trade. Economy: strategy and practice, 18(3), 268–283. https://doi.org/10.51176/1997-9967-2023-3-268-283 (In Kaz.)

34. Kapalova, N., Algazy, K., & Haumen, A. (2023). Development of a new lightweight encryption algorithm. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 9(123), 6-19. https://doi.org/10.15587/17294061.2023.280055

35. Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. London: Sage Publications.

36. Kumar, S., Jain, R., Narain, Balli, F., & Billah, M. (2023). Interconnectivity and investment strategies among commodity prices, cryptocurrencies, and G-20 capital markets: A comparative analysis during COVID-19 and Russian-Ukraine war. International Review of Economics & Finance, 88, 547-593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2023.06.039

37. Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.

38. Miles, D., Scott, A., & Breedon, F. (2012). Macroeconomics: understanding the global economy. John Wiley & Sons.

39. Mishra, A. K., Obaidat, M. S., Puthal, D., Tripathy, A. K., & Choo, K. K. R. (2018). Graph-based symmetric crypto-system for data confidentiality. In 2018 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/GLOCOM.2018.8647844

40. Moldabekova, A. T., Philipp, R., Akhmetova, Z. B., & Asanova, T. A. (2021). The role of digital technologies in the development of logistics in Kazakhstan in the formation of Industry 4.0. Economy: strategy and practice, 16(2), 164–177. https://doi.org/10.51176/1997-99672021-2-164-177 (In Russ.)

41. Mosca, M., & Piani, M. (2021). Quantum threat timeline report 2020. Global Risk Institute. [cited October 15, 2024]. Available at: https://globalriskinstitute.org/publications/quantum-threat-timeline-report-2020

42. Nekhili, R., Alomari, M., Mensi, W., & Sultan, J. (2024). Return spillovers between decentralized finance and centralized finance markets. Eurasian Economic Review, 14, 487-506. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40822-023-00260-w

43. Obstfeld, M., & Rogoff, K. (2009). Global imbalances and the financial crisis: Products of common causes. CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP7606. [cited October 15, 2024]. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1533211

44. Park, S., Lee, S., Lee, Y., Ko, H., Son, B., Lee, J., & Jang, H. (2022). Price co-movements in decentralized financial markets. Applied Economics Letters, 30(21), 3075-3082. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2022.2120952

45. Reinert, K.A. (2009). The Princeton Encyclopedia of the World Economy. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

46. Ricks, M. (2019). Money as infrastructure. Columbia Business Law Review, 2018(3), 757–851. https://doi.org/10.7916/cblr.v2018i3.1707.

47. Schuler, K., Cloots, A. S., & Schär, F. (2024). On DeFi and On-Chain CeFi: How (Not) to Regulate Decentralized Finance. Journal of Financial Regulation, 10 (2), 213–242. https://doi.org/10.1093/jfr/fjad014

48. Schuler, K., Nadler, M., & Schär, F. (2023). Contagion and loss redistribution in crypto-asset markets. Economics Letters, 231, 111310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2023.111310

49. Statista. (2024a). Number of identity-verified cryptoasset users from 2016 to June 2024 (in millions). Statista. [cited October 15, 2024]. Available at: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1202503/global-cryptocurrency-user-base/

50. Statista. (2024b). Energy consumption from Bitcoin compared to the total energy consumption in selected countries worldwide as of December 9, 2024. Statista. [cited October 15, 2024]. Available at: https://www.statista.com/statistics/881522/bitcoin-energy-consumption-relative-to-select-countries/

51. Stake, R. E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. London: Sage Publications.

52. Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence‐informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207-222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375