Preview

Economy: strategy and practice

Advanced search

Cross-Border Interaction between Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan in Logistics: Conceptual Approaches

https://doi.org/10.51176/1997-9967-2024-4-85-103

Abstract

The article examines cross-border cooperation between Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan, focusing on developing logistics in border regions. Central Asian regions face significant barriers, such as logistical inefficiencies, legal and customs discrepancies, and weak coordination, which hinder their ability to meet the growing demand for freight transportation. The article aims to propose conceptual approaches for harmonizing regulations, simplifying customs procedures, and removing obstacles to the movement of goods and services across border regions. The research methodology includes case studies of transport corridors and content analysis of data from international organizations and national statistical agencies. The analysis of the Trans-Caspian Route and the Southern Corridor highlights challenges such as high transport costs, lack of institutional support, geopolitical influences, and investment risks. Special attention is given to crossborder industrial logistics zones (ILZs), which could serve as strategic tools for reducing transaction costs and expediting cargo processing. These zones should be integrated with international transport networks and automated customs systems. The research results show that sustainable development of crossborder cooperation requires not only infrastructure investments but also institutional reforms, including the establishment of joint regulatory bodies and harmonization of legislation to eliminate administrative barriers. The article provides recommendations for simplifying customs procedures, establishing industriallogistics centers, developing transport corridors, and forming a concept of cross-border interaction. Future research directions include assessing the economic impact of the proposed ILZs and exploring digital platforms for real-time coordination of freight transportation.

About the Authors

G. Bodaubayeva
University of International Business named after K. Sagadiyev
Kazakhstan

Gulmira Bodaubayeva – Cand. Sc. (Econ.), Associate Professor

8a Abay Ave., Almaty



H. Holzhacker
CAREC Institute
China

Hans Holzhacker – Chief Economist

No. 66 Longteng Road, Shuimogou District, 830028, Urumqi



A. Beifert
Wismar University of Applied Sciences
Germany

Anatoli Beifert – PhD, Associate Professor

14 Philipp-Müller Str., 23966, Wismar



N. Zhaken
Al-Farabi Kazakh National University
Kazakhstan

Nurkhan Zhaken – PhD candidate

71 Al-Farabi Ave., Almaty



References

1. ADB. (2020). Strengthening Cross-Border Community Collaboration in The CAREC Region: A Scoping Study. Asian Development Bank. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22617/TCS200343-3

2. ADB. (2023). Assessing Economic Corridor Development Potential Among Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and Tajikistan: A Prefeasibility Study of an International Center for Industrial Cooperation on the Border of Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan. PricewaterhouseCoopers Pvt Ltd. https://www.adb.orgBrunet-

3. Jailly, E. (2022). Cross-border cooperation: A global overview. Alternatives, 47(1), 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/03043754211073463

4. Beifert, A., & Prause, G. (2019). Integration opportunities of land-based Eurasian transport corridors: Rail Baltica and OBOR initiatives. Forthcoming.

5. Beifert, A., Shcherbanin, Y., & Vinokurov, E. (2018). Trans-Eurasian land transport corridors: Assessment of prospects and barriers. Laxenburg, Austria: IIASA, Eurasian Development Bank.

6. Davis, D. F., & Friske, W. (2015). Improving cross-border logistics: The role of public-private partnerships. In Developments in marketing science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science (pp. 341). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10951-0_129

7. CIS Interstate Statistical Committee. (2024). CISStat database. [cited October 20, 2024]. Available: https://new.cisstat.org

8. EBRD. (2023). Sustainable transport connections between Europe and Central Asia: Final report. European Union.

9. Gutiérrez, M., Sánchez-Atondo, A., García, L., Mungaray-Moctezuma, A., & Calderón, J. (2021). Understanding cross-border mobility in medium-small Mexico-U.S. binational regions: Mexicali-Imperial Valley case study. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 9, 100324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2021.100324

10. Havlíček, T., Jeřábek, M., & Dokoupil, J. (2018). Principles and influential factors of cross-border economic cooperation zones. In Borders in Central Europe after the Schengen Agreement (pp. 123-136). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63016-8_6

11. Hu, W., Fang, X., Ye, C., Hu, Z., & Li, C. (2024). Obstacles to geo-economic cooperation in the China-Myanmar Indian Ocean New Channel and its collaborative mechanisms. Tropical Geography, 44(7), 1161– 1170. https://doi.org/10.13284/j.cnki.rddl.20230811

12. Huang, X., Liu, Z., & Shen, X. (2023). The cooperation mode of cross-border e-commerce logistics supply chain based on blockchain. Proceedings - 2023 International Conference on Industrial IoT, Big Data and Supply Chain (IIoTBDSC 2023), 300–305. https://doi.org/10.1109/IIoTBDSC60298.2023.00060

13. Hurley, J., Morris, S., & Portelance, G. (2018). Examining the Debt Implications of the Belt and Road Initiative from a Policy Perspective. Center for Global Development. ITF. (2019). Enhancing Connectivity and Freight in in Central Asia: Case-Specific Policy Analysis. International Transport Forum Policy Papers, No. 71, OECD Publishing, Paris https://www.itf-oecd.org

14. Ji, M., Li, F., Xu, S., Zhuang, Y., Bair, T., Bilgaev, A., & Guo, K. (2023). Potential for economic transition and key directions of cross-border cooperation between Primorsky Krai (Russia) and Jilin (China). Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(5), 4163. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054163

15. Kawachi, K., & Shibasaki, R. (2024). How do corridor development and border facilitation policies impact future container transport in inland South Asia? – A network simulation approach. Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 40(1), 61–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2024.01.003

16. Khmeleva, G. A., Kurnikova, M. V., Nedelka, E., & Toth, B. I. (2022). Determinants of sustainable cross-border cooperation: A structural model for the Hungarian context using the PLS-SEM methodology. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(2), 0893. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020893

17. Medeiros, E. (2019). Cross-border transports and cross-border mobility in EU border regions. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 7(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2018.11.001

18. Medeiros, E., Ferreira, R., Boijmans, P., Verschelde, N., Spisiak, R., Skoniezki, P., Dietachmair, J., Hurnaus, K., Ebster, M., Madsen, S., Ballaguy, R.-L., Volponi, E., Isinger, E., Voiry, P., Markl-Hummel, L., Harster, P., Sippel, L., Nolte, J., Maarfield, S., Lehnert, C., Perchel, A., Sodini, S., Mickova, B., & Berzi, M. (2021). Boosting cross-border regions through better cross-border transport services: The European case. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 9(1), 291-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2021.01.006

19. OECD. (2022). Export Processing Zones: Past and Future Role in Trade and Development. OECD Trade Policy Papers, No. 139. https://doi.org/10.1787/18166873

20. Price Waterhouse Coopers. (2022). Report on the Preliminary Feasibility Study for the Development of the Shymkent-Tashkent-Khujand Economic Corridor. Asian Development Bank. (In Russ).

21. Ramírez, M. G. (2018). Institutionalisation of cross-border cooperation: The role of the Association of European Border Regions. In T. Havlíček, M. Jeřábek, & J. Dokoupil (Eds.), Borders in Central Europe after the Schengen Agreement (pp. 123-136). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63016-8_6

22. Sorwar, G., Hoque, R., & Islam, S. (2021). Assessing cross-border e-commerce success: A cross-country analysis. In E-business in the 21st century: Essential topics and studies (2nd ed., pp. 335–363). https://doi.org/10.1142/9789811231841_0014

23. UNCTAD. (2021). Review of maritime transport 2021. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. https://unctad.org/webflyer/review-maritime-transport-2021

24. United Nations. (2021). UN Comtrade database. [cited October 20, 2024]. Available: https://comtrade.un.org

25. World Bank. (2023). Middle Trade and Transport Corridor: Policies and Investments to Triple Freight Volumes and Halve Travel Time by 2030. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/40626

26. Xiujun, X. (2019). Cross-border industrial parks. In Routledge Handbook of the Belt and Road (pp. 315–318). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429203039-58

27. Xie, F., Wang, Y., & Zhou, X. (2023). Research on the construction of cross-border logistics hub network of Western China along the Belt and Road. Advances in Transdisciplinary Engineering, 35, 140–148. https://doi.org/10.3233/ATDE230039

28. Yang, X., Jiang, H., & Chen, W. (2023). Evolutionary game analysis of cross-border e-commerce logistics alliance subject considering supply chain disruption risk. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(23), Article 16350. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152316350

29. Zhu, S., Jia, S., Sun, Q., & Meng, Q. (2023). An empirical study of China–Singapore International Land–Sea Trade Corridor: Analysis from supply and demand sides. Transport Policy, 135, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2023.03.001


Review

For citations:


Bodaubayeva G., Holzhacker H., Beifert A., Zhaken N. Cross-Border Interaction between Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan in Logistics: Conceptual Approaches. Economy: strategy and practice. 2024;19(4):85-103. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51176/1997-9967-2024-4-85-103

Views: 96


ISSN 1997-9967 (Print)
ISSN 2663-550X (Online)