The Role of Education in Developing a Green Economy: A Case Study of Kazakhstan and Turkey

Currently, the issue of education for the development of a ‘green’ economy is among the most pressing global challenges. In this context, this study explores the relationship between CO2 emissions and education levels, represented by government spending on education as a share of GDP, alongside economic and social indicators such as GDP per capita, urbanization ratio, and inflation rate. The analysis focuses on the cases of Kazakhstan and Turkey. The study used a forecasting methodology involving a regression model to determine the relationships between changes in CO2 emissions, educational attainment, and economic and social parameters. A multiple linear regression model was constructed to assess education’s impact, and the ecological footprint and ecological deficit for the two countries studied were determined. The study uses information from the Footprint Data Foundation (Footprint Data Foundation). The research complements the existing theoretical framework on sustainable development, offering an interdisciplinary approach combining economic, environmental and educational aspects. The results show that education and GDP per capita significantly positively impact reducing CO2 emissions in Kazakhstan. The results can be used to justify the need to integrate environmental knowledge into educational programs and to develop more comprehensive models of the interaction of factors affecting the reduction of the carbon footprint. From a practical point of view, the study’s results will provide empirical data and analysis that can be useful for developing educational and economic strategies and more effective government programs aimed at reducing CO2 emissions, improving environmental quality and promoting green growth.

1. Apergis, N. (2016). Environmental Kuznets curves: New evidence on both panel and country-level CO2 emissions. Energy Economics, 54, 263–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.12.007

2. Aubakirova, G.M., Biryukov, V.V., Issatayeva, F.M., & Mazhitova, S.K. (2023). Decarbonization of the Kazakhstan Economy: Prospects for the Energy Transition. Economy: strategy and practice, 18(4), 55-72. https://doi.org/10.51176/1997-9967-2023-4-55-72 (In Russ).

3. Ardoin, N.M., Bowers, A.W., & Gaillard, E. (2020). Environmental education outcomes for conservation: A systematic review. Biological Conservation, 241, 108224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108224

4. Bobylev, S.N., Goryacheva, A.A., Nemova, V.I. (2017). Green economy: project approach. Public administration. Electronic newsletter, 64, 34-44. https://clck.ru/3FUChb (In Russ).

5. Bowen, A. (2012). Green growth, green jobs, and labor markets. The World Bank Sustainable Development Network, Office of the Chief Economist. [cited August 20, 2024]. Available at: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/97723ade-3eb9-5005-b122-d6d7726bbbe4/content

6. Footprint Data Foundation. (2023). National footprint and biocapacity accounts, 2023 edition. [cited August 20, 2024]. Available at: https://data.footprintnetwork.org

7. Haggis, S.M. (1991). Education for all: purpose and context. UNESCO. [cited August 20, 2024]. Available at: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000184555

8. He, M., Abbasi, B. N., & Fan, Z. (2024). Education and technological innovation in mitigating CO2 emissions and fostering green economic growth in China: Marginal effects and policy threshold analyses. Journal of Environmental Management, 370, 122786. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0301479724027725

9. Jackson, T. (2009). Prosperity without Growth: Economics for a Finite Planet. London: Routledge.

10. Kaminov, А. А. (2019). “Zelenaya” ekonomika: obrazovanie kak faktor perekhoda [Green economy: Education as a factor of transition]. In Sistema upravleniya ekologicheskoy bezopasnostyu: Sbornik trudov IX zaochnoy mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoprakticheskoy konferentsii (Yekaterinburg, May 30–31, 2015) (pp. 200–204). Yekaterinburg: UrFU. [cited August 20, 2024]. Available at: https://elar.urfu.ru/bitstream/10995/37439/1/ecology_2015_200-204.pdf

11. Ketenci, N. (2021). Environmental Kuznets curve in the presence of structural breaks: New evidence for individual European countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 31520–31538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12677-4

12. Lin, B., & Zhou, Y. (2022). Measuring the green economic growth in China: Influencing factors and policy perspectives. Energy, 241, 122518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.122518

13. Liu, H., Alharthi, M., Atil, A., Zafar, M.W., & Khan, I. (2022). A non-linear analysis of the impacts of natural resources and education on environmental quality: Green energy and its role in the future. Resources Policy, 79, 102940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102940

14. Mahalik, М.К., Mallick, H., & Padhan, H. (2021). Do educational levels influence the environmental quality? The role of renewable and non-renewable energy demand in selected BRICS countries with a new policy perspective. Renewable Energy, 164, 419-432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.09.090

15. Muravyova, А.А., & Oleynikova, О. N. (2016). Transformation of the Educational Paradigm in the Conditions of Formation of the “Green” Economy. Education and science, 8(137), 23-37. (In Russ).

16. OECD. (2011). Declaration on Green Growth. [cited August 20, 2024]. Available at: https://www.oecd.org

17. Pakina, A.A., & Gorbanyov, V.A. (2019). Prospects of green economy as a new paradigm of development. MGIMO Review of International Relations, 12(5), 134-155. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-81602019-5-68-134-155

18. Qi, X., & Yang, Z. (2023). Drivers of green innovation in BRICS countries: Exploring triple bottom line theory. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 36(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2150670

19. Rogatnyh, Е. B., & Serdun, М. А. (2022). Green economy and its impact on economic development in the 21st century. Russian Foreign Economic Bulletin, 3, 1832. https://doi.org/10.24412/2072-8042-2022-3-18-32 (In Russ).

20. Saubetova, B.S., Saimagambetova, G.A., Esturlieva, A.I., & Amaniyazova, G.D. (2023). The Impact of Energy Transition Risks on the Sustainable Development of Kazakhstan’s Economy. Economy: strategy and practice, 18(2), 135-147. https://doi.org/10.51176/1997-99672023-2-135-147

21. Shahbaz, M., & Sinha, A. (2019). Environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: A literature survey. Journal of Economic Studies, 46(1), 106–168. https://doi.org/10.1108/JES-09-2017-0249

22. Sustainable Development Solutions Network. (2024). Sustainable development report 2024: The SDGs and the UN Summit of the Future. [cited August 20, 2024]. Available at: https://dashboards.sdgindex.org

23. UNEP (2012). United Nations Environment Program 2011 Annual Report. [cited August 20, 2024]. Available at: https://www.unep.org/ru/node/1275

24. UNEP. (2023). Emissions gap report 2023. [cited August 20, 2024]. Available at: https://www.unep.org/interactives/emissions-gap-report/2023/#section_0

25. UNESCO. (2015). Global citizenship education: Topics and learning objectives. [cited October 20, 2024]. Available at: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000232993

26. UNESCO. (2019). UNESCO roadmap for implementing the Global Action Programme on Education for Sustainable Development. [cited October 20, 2024]. Available at: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000230514

27. World Economic Forum. (2013). The Green Investment Report: The ways and means to unlock private finance for green growth. Geneva, Switzerland. [cited August 20, 2024]. Available at: https://www3.weforum.org

28. World Bank. (2023). World development indicators. . [cited August 20, 2024]. Available at: https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators

29. Zheng, L., Umar, M., Safi, A., & Khaddage-Soboh, N. (2024). The role of higher education and institutional quality for carbon neutrality: Evidence from emerging economies. Economic Analysis and Policy, 81, 406 - 417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2023.12.008

30. Zhu, T. T., Peng, H. R., Zhang, Y. J., & Liu, J. Y. (2021). Does higher education development facilitate carbon emissions reduction in China. Applied Economics, 53(47), 5490–5502. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2021.1923641