Preview

Economy: strategy and practice

Advanced search

Population Engagement in Contemporary Economic Issues of the Country: Interregional Comparison

https://doi.org/10.51176/1997-9967-2025-3-123-138

Abstract

The relevance of scientific interest in the problem of population participation in the economic processes of the country is determined by the recognition of the key role of human capital in ensuring the growth of national welfare. The purpose of the article is to substantiate the author’s interpretation of the concept of “population involvement in the economic processes of the country” and to identify its impact on the level of economic well—being of citizens.  The research uses general scientific (analysis, synthesis, generalization) and economic-statistical methods, including correlation analysis, index method and grouping method. Theoretical approaches to determining the essence of economic involvement are systematized, its key components are clarified, and indicators characterizing economic well-being are substantiated.The results showed a stable positive correlation between indicators of economic activity of the population and key indicators of well-being. A comparative analysis showed an increase in the integral index of well-being in most regions of the country: if in 2010 a low level was recorded in 12 of the 16 regions, then by 2023 a high level was reached in three regions (Astana, Almaty, Atyrau region), while noticeable regional disparities remain. The data obtained make it possible to assess the current socio-economic state of society and the effectiveness of government policy in this area. The developed theoretical provisions and methodological approaches can be used in further scientific research, and the collected information base can be used in shaping socio-economic policy at the regional level.

About the Authors

Aizhan T. Tleuberdinova
Institute of Economics CS MSHE RK
Kazakhstan

Aizhan T. Tleuberdinova   Doc. Sc. (Econ.), Professor, Chief Researcher, 

28, Shevchenko St., Almaty.



Aksana Zh. Panzabekova
Institute of Economics CS MSHE RK
Kazakhstan

Aksana Zh. Panzabekova – Cand. Sc. (Econ.), Professor, Chief Researcher, 

28, Shevchenko St., Almaty.



Madina M. Khalitova
Institute of Economics CS MSHE RK
Kazakhstan

Madina M. Khalitova – Doc. Sc. (Econ.), Associate Professor, Chief Researcher, 

28, Shevchenko St., Almaty.



Arailym Sh. Suleimenova
Institute of Economics CS MSHE RK
Kazakhstan

Arailym Sh. Suleimenova – PhD student, Researcher, 

28, Shevchenko St., Almaty.



References

1. Akimbekova, Ch. U., & Dosumova, Zh. S. (2019). Povyshenie blagosostoyaniya selskogo naseleniya Kazakhstana. [Improving the well-being of the rural population of Kazakhstan]. Problems of the agricultural market, 3, 165-173. https://www.jpra-kazniiapk.kz/jour/article/view/328/277?locale=ru_RU (in Russ.)

2. Alam, M. N., Hassan, Md. M., Bowyer, D., & Md Reaz. (2020). The effects of wages and welfare facilities on employee productivity: Mediating role of employee work motivation. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 14(4), 38-60. https://doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v14i4.4

3. Artemova, O. V., Savchenko, A. N., & Melen’kina, S. A. (2022). Blagosostoyanie kak mera obespechennosti blagam naseleniya [Welfare as a measure of population’s provision with goods]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomika, 59, 58–77. https://doi.org/10.17223/19988648/59/4 (in Russ.)

4. Ashirbekova, L., Sansyzbaeva, K., Askerov, A., & Kurmanbaeva, A. (2023). Incomes of the population of Kazakhstan: Differentiation and forecast. Eurasian Journal of Economic and Business Studies, 67(2), 119-132. https://ejebs.com/index.php/main/article/view/289

5. Beglova, E. I., Nasyrova, S. I., & Yangirov, A. V. (2017). Factors of economic behavior of population in regional labor market. European Research Studies Journal, 20(4), 167-182. https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/883

6. Berdimurat, N., Zhadigerova, O. Z., Turdiyeva, T. Z., Amanzholova, A. A., & Jakupova, D.Y. (2024). Evaluating the impact of socio-economic variables on GDP per capita: A case study of Kazakhstan. Bulletin of the Karaganda University. Economy Series, 3(115), 58-65. https://doi.org/10.31489/2024ec3/58-65

7. Brauner-Otto, S. R., Yang, C. W., & Ng, K. U. (2023). Women’s employment trajectories in a low-income setting: Stratification and change in Nepal. Demographic Research, 49(8), 157-200. https://doi.org/10.4054/demres.2023.49.8

8. Butova, L. M. (2006). Blagosostoyanie naseleniya i mekhanizm ego regulirovaniya [Welfare of the population and the mechanism of its regulation]. Vestnik VGU. Seriya Ekonomika i upravlenie, 1, 5-10 (in Russ.)

9. Damota, M. D. (2019). The effect of divorce on families’ life. Journal of Culture, Society and Development, 46, 6-11. https://doi.org/10.7176/jcsd/46-02

10. Grzega, U. (2018). Macroeconomic determinants of the standard of living – Theoretical considerations. Optimum Economic Studies, 2(92) 191–205. https://doi.org/10.15290/oes.2018.02.92.15

11. Guo, L., & Wang, F. (2024). The impact of demographic dividend shift on household consumption: Evidence from China. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, 1708. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-04251-3

12. Helliwell, J., Layard, R., & Sachs, J. (2023). World happiness report 2023. Sustainable Development Solutions Network. Retrieved June 12, 2025, from https://worldhappiness.report

13. Jarden, A., & Roache, A. (2023). What is wellbeing? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(6), 5006. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20065006

14. Kaplun, A. A. (2015). Finansy domashnikh khozyaistv: sushchnost’ i rol’ v razvitii investitsionnogo potentsiala Rossii [Household finances: Essence and role in the development of Russia’s investment potential]. Vestnik Astrakhanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 4, 80–91. (in Russ.)

15. Khussainova, Z. S., Yeskendir, N. N., Kuttybaeva, N. B., & Sadvakasova, A. T. (2024). Analysis of the living standards of the population in Kazakhstan in the context of assessing the potential for inclusive growth and creative diversification of the economy. Bulletin of the Karaganda University. Economy Series, 113(1), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.31489/2024Ec1/55-71

16. Klochko, V. E., Galazhinskii, E. V., Krasnoryadtseva, O. M., & Luk’yanov, O. V. (2015). Obshchaya psikhologiya i psikhologiya lichnosti [General psychology and personality psychology]. Sibirskii psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 56, 9–20. https://doi.org/10.17223/17267080/56/2 (in Russ.)

17. Martynova, I. (2011). On welfare indicators. The paper analyses principal indicators of welfare illustrated by UK example. World and National Economy, 1(16). Retrieved June 12, 2025, from https://mirec.mgimo.ru/2011/2011-01/o-pokazatelyah-blagosostoyaniya?utm_source=google.com&utm_medium=organic&utm_campaign=google.com&utm_referrer=google. com

18. Naiden, S. N., & Belousova, A. V. (2018). Metodicheskii instrumentarii otsenki blagosostoyaniya naseleniya: mezhregional’noe sopostavlenie [Methodological tools for assessing population well-being: Interregional comparison]. Ekonomika regiona, 14(1), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.17059/2018-1-5 (in Russ)

19. Nesterova, O. A., & Pozharnitskaya, O. V. (2018). Otsenka blagosostoyaniya s pozitsii ustoichivogo chelovecheskogo razvitiya: vozmozhnosti mezhdunarodnykh indeksov [Assessment of welfare from the standpoint of sustainable human development: Possibilities of international indices]. Voprosy innovatsionnoi ekonomiki, 8(3), 335–348. https://doi.org/10.18334/vinec.8.3.39338 (in Russ.)

20. Nkomo, N. Y., & Adanlawo, E. F. (2023). The implications of population ageing on savings rates. Management and Entrepreneurship: Trends of Development, 24(2), 8–16. https://doi.org/10.26661/2522-1566/20232/24-01

21. OECD. (2013). How’s life? Measuring well-being. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264201392-en

22. Pavlova, I. A., Nedospasova, O. P., & Barysheva, G. A. (2020). Kompleksnaya otsenka sotsial’no-ekonomicheskoy vovlechyonnosti grazhdan starshego pokoleniya v regional’nyy sotsium na primere trudovoy aktivnosti. [Comprehensive assessment of socio-economic engagement of the older generation in the regional society based on labor activity]. Vectors of Well-being: Economy and Society, 4(39), 48–84. https://doi.org/10.18799/26584956/2020/4(39)/1060 (in Russ.)

23. Rahman, M., Azma, N., Masud, A. K., & Ismail, Y. (2020). Determinants of indebtedness: Influence of behavioral and demographic factors. International Journal of Financial Studies, 8(1), 8 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs8010008

24. Rakhimzhanova, K., Bulakbay, Zh. M., & Kodasheva, G. (2022). The impact of the state’s social policy on the well-being of the population in Kazakhstan: Increasing income and quality of life. Bulletin of L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University. Economic Series, 4, 220-230. https://doi.org/10.32523/2789-4320-2022-4220-230

25. Romir Institute of Man. (2023, October). Indeks blagosostoyaniya [Welfare index]. Retrieved June 12, 2025 from https://romir.ru/studies/indeks-blagosostoyaniya-oktyabr-2023

26. Rotar’, T. S. (2019). Ekonometricheskii podkhod k otsenivaniyu blagosostoyaniya naseleniya Respubliki Sakha (Yakutiya) [Econometric approach to assessing population welfare in the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia)]. EPP,9(4), 339-354. https://doi.org/10.18334/epp.9.4.41499 (in Russ.)

27. Samieva, G. T. (2024). Socio-economic factors of increasing the standard of living of the population. Generis Publishing. Retrieved June 12, 2025 from https://generis-publishing.com/upload/books/2024/07/strong-SOCIO-ECONOMIC-FACTORS-OF-INCREASINGTHE-STANDARD-OF-LIVING-OF-THE-POPULA-TION-strong_preview_1722258450.pdf

28. Santalova, M. S., Balakhanova, D. K., & Kublanov, A. M. (2016). Blagosostoyanie kak pokazatel’ kachestva zhizni naseleniya [Welfare as an indicator of population’s quality of life]. MNIZh, 11(53), 62-64 https://doi.org/10.18454/IRJ.2016.53.205 (in Russ.)

29. Sauranbai, S. B., Baidybekova, S. K., & Osmanov, Zh. D. (2023). Uroven’ zhizni naseleniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye indikatory razvitiya [Standard of living of the population: Economic and social development indicators]. Economy: Strategy and Practice, 18(2), 37–56. https://doi.org/10.51176/1997-9967-2023-2-37-56 (in Russ.)

30. Sen, A. (2004). Razvitie kak svoboda [Development as freedom]. Novoe izd-vo, Liber. Missiya. (in Russ.)

31. Sharma, A. N. (2022). Youth employment and unemployment in India: Issues and challenges. Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 65(1), 237–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41027-022-00387-5

32. Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J.-P. (2009). Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. Retrieved June 12, 2025 from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/8131721/8131772/Stiglitz-Sen-Fitoussi-Commission-report.pdf

33. Tokaev, K.-Zh. (2022). My dolzhny perezagruzit’ sistemu obshchestvennykh tsennostey [We must reboot the system of public values]. Vlast.kz. Retrieved June 12, 2025 from https://vlast.kz/novosti/52587-my-dolzny-perezagruzit-sistemu-obsestvennyh-cennostej-tokaev.html (in Russ.)

34. Tsimbalist, A. V. (2008). Blagosostoyanie rossiiskogo obshchestva v sisteme otsenki kachestva zhizni [Welfare of Russian society in the system of quality of life assessment]. Vestnik Rossiiskoi ekonomicheskoi akademii im. G.V. Plekhanova, 6(24), 74–79. (in Russ.)

35. Voikina, E. A., Mirgorod, E. E., & Shubenkova, E. V. (2020). Otsenka neravenstva blagosostoyaniya naseleniya Rossii [Assessment of inequality in welfare of the Russian population]. Ekonomika truda, 7(2), 141-154. https://doi.org/10.18334/et.7.2.100480 (in Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Tleuberdinova A.T., Panzabekova A.Zh., Khalitova M.M., Suleimenova A.Sh. Population Engagement in Contemporary Economic Issues of the Country: Interregional Comparison. Economy: strategy and practice. 2025;20(3):123-138. (In Kazakh) https://doi.org/10.51176/1997-9967-2025-3-123-138

Views: 7


ISSN 1997-9967 (Print)
ISSN 2663-550X (Online)