ИНСТИТУЦИОНАЛЬНАЯ СРЕДА РАЗВИТИЯ НАУКОЕМКОГО СЕКТОРА И ИННОВАЦИОННОГО ПРЕДПРИНИМАТЕЛЬСТВА В СТРАНАХ ЕВРАЗИЙСКОГО ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКОГО СОЮЗА

This article provides a comparative analysis of the current state and development of the institutional environment of high-tech science-intensive sector of the Eurasian economic Union as a key factor in the development of innovative entrepreneurship. Comparison of the level of development of knowledge-based GDP of the member States of the Eurasian economic Union indicates a relatively low level of these indicators. The stable low level of knowledge intensity of the countries of the Eurasian economic Union causes a relatively low level of innovative development of the economy and a high level of technological dependence of economic agents. Therefore, the creation and development of an institutional environment of high-tech science-intensive sector that meets international requirements is a key factor in overcoming the backlog in the innovative development of the countries of the Eurasian economic Union. The methodology of the institutional environment analysis is as follows, the initial period of creation of the regulatory framework of scientific and innovative activity, formation of the main subjects of innovative infrastructure, development of conceptual and program-target bases of strategic planning of innovative policy for the countries of the Eurasian economic Union is defined. It is established that despite the more than 20-year period of formation and development of the national innovation system of the Eurasian economic Union, the main problems of ensuring the effective work of the service organization and the proper resource support for innovation are still not solved. According to the results of the comparative analysis, it is established that at the moment only Russia has a sufficiently developed institutional environment of the knowledge-intensive sector, all other countries are experiencing financial constraints and must integrate their national innovation policies within the framework of the Eurasian economic Union. The results of this study can be used in the direction of adjusting national policies for the development of high-tech innovative entrepreneurship, taking into account the application of effective practices of institutional support of national innovation systems.

EURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION, SCIENCE-INTENSIVE HIGH-TECH SECTOR, INNOVATIVE ENTREPRENEURSHIP, INSTITUTIONAL ENVIRONMENT

1. Shelomentsev A.G., Medvedev M.A., Isaichik K.F., Dyomina M.I., Berg I.A., Kit M. (2017). The trajectories of EAEC Countries Development: Numerical Analysis of Competitive Strategies in Investments. Proceedings of the 43rd International Conference Applications of Mathematics in Engineering and Economics. DOI: 10.1063/1.5013958. (Web of Science)

2. Khusainov B.D,, Kireyeva A.A., Sultanov R. (2017). Eurasian Economic Union: Asymmetries of Growth Factors. Journal of Asian Finance Economics and Business, 4 (1), 51-58, DOI: 10.13106/jafeb.2017. vol4.no1.51. (Web of Science)

3. Dynkin A.A., Telegina E.A., Khalova G.O. (2018). The role of the Eurasian economic union in the formation of great Eurasia. Mirovaya Ekonomika i Mezhdunarodnye Otnosheniya, 62 (4), 5-24, DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2018-62-4-5-24. (Web of Science)

4. Ulybyshev D.N., Petrenko Ye., Lenkova O., Akenov S. (2017), Priority Directions of Cooperation and Interaction of the Countries of the Eurasian Economic Union in the Scientific and Innovative Environment, Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics. Vol. 8., Iss. 6(28). p. 2024-2030 (Scopus)

5. Улыбышев Д.Н., Кенжебеков Н.Д. Возможности и механизмы развития казахстанского инновационного бизнеса в рамках Евразийского экономического союза // Экономика Центральной Азии. - 2017. - Т. 1.- № 3. - С. 145-154

6. Tambovtsev V.L., (2018) On scientific validity of Russian science policy, VOPROSY EKONOMIKI, Vol.: 70, P.: 5-32, DOI: https://doi. org/10.32609/0042-8736-2018-2-5-32 (Web of Science)

7. Vieira A. (2017). A Tale of Two Unions: Russia-Belarus Integration Experience and its Lessons for the Eurasian Economic Union. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 32 (1), 41-53, DOI: 10.1080/08865655.2016.1211959. (Web of Science)

8. Mukhtarova K., Ziyadin S., Kupeshova S., Doszhan R. (2017). Problems of developing the foundations of sustainable competitiveness of industrial and innovative economy in Kazakhstan. Economic Annals-ХХI: Vol.168, Is.11-12, P.: 38-43. doi: https:// doi.org/10.21003/ea.V168-08 (Scopus)

9. Taubayev A.; Akenov S.; Ulybyshev D., Kernebaev A. (2017) Institutional support of agro- industrial complex entities of quasi-public sector of Kazakhstan. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, Volume VIII, Issue 4(26), Summer 2017. pp. 1560-1565. DOI: 10.14505/jarle.v8.4(26).35 (Scopus)

10. Inform.kz, (2014). OECD standards - target indicators for Kazakhstan to become one of the 30 most developed countries in the world, Retrieved from https:// www.inform.kz/ru/standarty-oesr-celevye-indikatory-dlya-vhozhdeniya-kazahstana-v-chislo-30-samyh-razvityh-stran-mira_a2732409 [Дата обращения 03.03.2019]

11. Amoroso S., Audretsch D.B., Link A.N. (2018) Sources of knowledge used by entrepreneurial firms in the European high-tech sector, Eurasian Business Review, Vol. 8, No. 1, P.: 55-70, DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1007/s40821-017-0078-4 (Web of Science)

12. Baldi G., Bodmer A. (2018) R&D investments and corporate cash holdings, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Vol. 27, No. 7, P.: 594- 610, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2017.1378 191 (Web of Science)

13. Aguiar L., Gagnepain P. (2017) European cooperative R&D and firm performance: Evidence based on funding differences in key actions, International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 53, P.: 1-31, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ijindorg.2016.12.007 (Web of Science)

14. Elnasri A., Fox K.J. (2017). The contribution of research and innovation to productivity, Journal of Productivity Analysis, Vol.: 47. Special Issue, No: 3. P.: 291-308, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-017- 0503-9 (Web of Science)

15. Цыплакова Д.А. Институциональная среда как детерминирующий фактор формирования экономики знаний в России // Креативная экономика. - 2010. - № 4. - [Электронный ресурс] https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/institutsionalnaya- sreda-kak-determiniruyuschiy-faktor-formirovaniya-ekonomiki-znaniy-v-rossii

16. Сергиенко В.В. Институциональная среда как фактор активизации инновационного процесса в экономике // Вестник университета. - 2013. - №2 1. - С. 221-224. - [Электронный ресурс] https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/institutsionalnaya- sreda-kak-faktor-aktivizatsii-innovatsionnogo-protsessa-v-ekonomike

17. Государственный комитет по статистике Армении (2019). Официальный вебсайт. [Электронный ресурс] https://www.armstat.am/file/ doc/99510763.pdf [Дата обращения 03.03.2019]

18. Государственный комитет по статистике Беларуси (2019). Официальный вебсайт. [Электронный ресурс] http://www.belstat.gov.by/ ofi sialnaya-statistika/realny-sector-ekonomiki/nauka- i-innovatsii/grafi-material-grafi-diagrammy/ vnutrennie-zatraty-na-nauchnye-issledovaniya-i-razrabotki/ [Дата обращения 03.03.2019]

19. Государственный комитет по статистике Казахстана (2019). Официальный вебсайт. [Электронный ресурс] http://stat.gov.kz/faces/wcnav_ externalId/ [Дата обращения 03.03.2019]

20. Государственный комитет по статистике Кыргызстана (2019). Официальный вебсайт. [Электронный ресурс] http://www.stat.kg/media/ publicationarchive/ ad 9 b 72 f 1- e 155-4455- b 7 fd- 5dd6a3df354b.pdf [Дата обращения 03.03.2019]

21. Государственный комитет по статистике России (2019). Официальный вебсайт. [Электронный ресурс] http://www.gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_ main/rosstat/ru/statistics/science_and_innovations/ science/# [Дата обращения 03.03.2019]

22. OECD, (1996). The Knowledge-based Economy, OCDE/GD(96)102, Paris, 1996, Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/ officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote= OCDE/GD%2896%29102&docLanguage=En [Дата обращения 03.03.2019]

23. Развитие армянской науки в русле стратегии национальной безопасности Армении. - Режим доступа: http://www.noravank.am

24. Инновации для устойчивого развития. Второй обзор инновационного развития Республики Беларусь. Электронный ресурс. - Режим доступа: http://scienceportal.org.by/reports/

25. Концепция Государственной программы инновационного развития Республики Беларусь на 2016-2020 годы. - Минск, 2015. - 39с.

26. Указ Президента Республики Казахстан от 4 июня 2013 г., № 579 «Об утверждении Концепции инновационного развития Республики Казахстан до 2020 года». - [Электронный ресурс] http://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=31409916

27. Кодекс Республики Казахстан от 29 октября 2015 г., № 375-v «Предпринимательский кодекс Республики Казахстан» (с изменениями и дополнениями по состоянию на 26.03.2019 г.). [Электронный ресурс] http://online.zakon.kz/ Document/?doc_id=38259854

28. Концепция инновационного развития Кыргызской республики до 2020 года. - Режим доступа: http://patent.kg/

29. Повестка развития инновационной инфраструктуры в Российской Федерации. Отчет. - Режим доступа: http://www.csr.ru/assets/%D0%94%D 0%BE%D0%BA%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B4_%D0 %98%D0%98_%D0%A0%D0%A4_%D0%A6%D0% A1%D0%A0.pdf