The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on the Structural Transformation of Kazakhstan's Economy
https://doi.org/10.51176/1997-9967-2026-1-110-127
Abstract
In the context of accelerating digital transformation, quantification of the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on the structural dynamics of resource–dependent economies is becoming particularly relevant. The purpose of the study is to develop and test an integrated dynamic model to quantify the impact of AI on Kazakhstan's structural transformation and diversification. The methodological framework includes the integration of the Bass model of innovation diffusion, an expanded production function with endogenous technological progress and the task-oriented Acemoglu–Restrepo approach, as well as a multi-criteria system of industry prioritisation. The empirical basis was based on industry data from the Bureau of National Statistics of the Republic of Kazakhstan for 2020-2024. The simulation results show that for the period 2025-2035. The cumulative increase in gross value added in the analysed industries will amount to 35.3 p.p., of which 16.8 percentage points are attributable to AI. The level of AI adoption in priority sectors reaches 86.8–93.8 p.p by 2035, which exceeds the indicators of non-priority industries by 13-32 p.p. The share of priority industries in the GDP structure increases by 6.3 p.p, while total employment increases by 22.4 p.p (+1.3 million jobs). At the same time, across all sectors, there is a steady excess of the effect of creating new tasks over the effect of automation, reflecting the specifics of a resource-dependent economy with a shortage of qualified personnel. The results confirm the expediency of concentrating government support on a limited number of industries with the greatest potential for structural transformation.
About the Authors
Ye. V. VaravinRussian Federation
Yevgeniy V. Varavin – Cand Sc. (Econ.), Associate ProfessorUst-Kamenogorsk
M. V. Kozlova
Russian Federation
Marina V. Kozlova – Cand Sc. (Econ.), ProfessorUst-Kamenogorsk
M. U. Rakhimberdinova
Russian Federation
Madina U. Rakhimberdinova – PhD, Professor Ust-Kamenogorsk
O. Ozpence
Turkey
Ozay Ozpence – PhD, Associate Professor
Denizli
References
1. Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2018). The race between man and machine: Implications of technology for growth, factor shares, and employment. American Economic Review, 108(6), 1488–1542. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20160696
2. Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2019). Automation and new tasks: How technology displaces and reinstates labor. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(2), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.33.2.3
3. Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (1992). A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica, 60(2), 323– 351. https://doi.org/10.2307/2951599
4. Aitnazarov, T. M., Andabayeva, G. K., & Kakizhanova, T. I. (2024). The role of digital technologies and their impact on the economy of Kazakhstan. Central Asian Economic Review, 3, 86–99. https://doi.org/10.52821/2789-4401-2024-3-86-99 (In Russ.)
5. Bass, F. M. (1969). A new product growth model for consumer durables. Management Science, 15(5), 215– 227. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.15.5.215
6. Bresnahan, T. F., & Trajtenberg, M. (1995). General purpose technologies: Engines of growth? Journal of Econometrics, 65(1), 83–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01598-T
7. Brynjolfsson, E., Li, D., & Raymond, L. R. (2023). Generative AI at work (NBER Working Paper No. 31161). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w31161
8. Bulkhairova, Zh. S., Alpeissova, Sh. E., & Kossymbayeva, Sh. I. (2023). [The current state and problems of economic digitalization in Kazakhstan]. Vestnik ENU im. L. N. Gumilyova. Ekonomicheskaya seriya = Bulletin of L.N. Gumilyov ENU. Economic Series, 1, 32–39. https://bulecon.enu.kz/index.php/main/article/view/110 (In Russ.)
9. Bureau of National Statistics. (2024). Bureau of National Statistics of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Retrieved December 15, 2025 from https://stat.gov.kz/en
10. Cockburn, I. M., Henderson, R., & Stern, S. (2018). The impact of artificial intelligence on innovation (NBER Working Paper No. 24449). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w24449
11. Comin, D., & Hobijn, B. (2010). An exploration of technology diffusion. American Economic Review, 100(5), 2031–2059. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.5.2031
12. Dell’Acqua, F., McFowland, E., Mollick, E. R., Lifshitz-Assaf, H., Kellogg, K., Rajendran, S., Krayer, L., Candelon, F., & Lakhani, K. R. (2023). Navigating the jagged technological frontier: Field experimental evidence of the effects of AI on knowledge worker productivity and quality (Harvard Business School Working Paper No. 24-013). Harvard Business School. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4573321
13. Denissova, O., Konurbayeva, Z., Kulisz, M., Yussubaliyeva, M., & Suieubayeva, S. (2025). Measuring the digital economy in Kazakhstan: From global indices to a contextual composite index (IDED). Economies, 13(8), 225. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies13080225
14. Eloundou, T., Manning, S., Mishkin, P., & Rock, D. (2023). GPTs are GPTs: An early look at the labor market impact potential of large language models. Science, 381(6654), 187–192. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adh2586
15. Felten, E., Raj, M., & Seamans, R. (2021). Occupational, industry, and geographic exposure to artificial intelligence: A novel dataset and its potential uses. Strategic Management Journal, 42(12), 2195–2217. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3286
16. Felten, E., Raj, M., & Seamans, R. (2023). How will language modelers like ChatGPT affect occupations and industries? arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.01157
17. Goldfarb, A., & Tucker, C. (2019). Digital economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 57(1), 3–43. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20171452
18. Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan (2024). Concept for the development of artificial intelligence in the Republic of Kazakhstan for 2024–2029 [Kontseptsiya razvitiya iskusstvennogo intellekta v Respublike Kazakhstan na 2024–2029 gody] (Resolution No. 592, July 24, 2024). https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/P2400000592 (In Russ.)
19. Hall, R. E., & Jones, C. I. (1999). Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(1), 83–116. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355399555954
20. Hausmann R., & Klinger B. (2007). The structure of the product space and the evolution of comparative advantage. CID Working Paper No. 146. Harvard University. Retrieved December 15, 2025 from https://www.hks.harvard.edu/sites/default/files/centers/cid/files/publications/faculty-working-papers/146.pdf
21. Hausmann, R., Hidalgo, C. A., Bustos, S., Coscia, M., Simoes, A., & Yildirim, M. A. (2014). The atlas of economic complexity: Mapping paths to prosperity. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9647.001.0001
22. Hidalgo, C. A., & Hausmann, R. (2009). The building blocks of economic complexity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(26), 10570–10575. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0900943106
23. International Monetary Fund. (2024). Gen-AI: Artificial intelligence and the future of work (IMF Staff Discussion Note No. 2024/001). https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400262548.006
24. McKinsey Global Institute. (2023). The economic potential of generative AI: The next productivity frontier. McKinsey & Company. Retrieved December 15, 2025 from https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/the-economic-potential-of-generative-ai-the-next-productivity-frontier
25. Mehlum, H., Moene, K., & Torvik, R. (2006). Institutions and the resource curse. Economic Journal, 116(508), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2006.01045.x
26. PricewaterhouseCoopers. (2017). Sizing the prize: What’s the real value of AI for your business and how can you capitalise? PwC. Retrieved December 15, 2025 from https://www.pwc.com.au/government/pwc-ai-analysis-sizing-the-prize-report.pdf
27. Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), S71–S102. https://doi.org/10.1086/261725
28. Sachs, J. D., & Warner, A. M. (1995). Natural resource abundance and economic growth (NBER Working Paper No. 5398). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w5398
29. Sachs, J. D., & Warner, A. M. (2001). The curse of natural resources. European Economic Review, 45(4–6), 827–838. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00125-8
30. Solow, R. M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65–94. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884513
31. Solow, R. M. (1957). Technical change and the aggregate production function. Review of Economics and Statistics, 39(3), 312–320. https://doi.org/10.2307/1926047
32. Sultan, F., Farley, J. U., & Lehmann, D. R. (1990). A meta-analysis of applications of diffusion models. Journal of Marketing Research, 27(1), 70–77. https://doi.org/10.2307/3172552
33. Trajtenberg, M. (2018). AI as the next GPT: A political-economy perspective (NBER Working Paper No. 24245). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w24245
34. Workforce Development Center. (2023). Assessment of the impact of automation, robotization and artificial intelligence on the labour market of the Republic of Kazakhstan [Otsenka vliyaniya avtomatizatsii, robotizatsii i iskusstvennogo intellekta na rynok truda Respubliki Kazakhstan]. https://erdo.enbek.kz/news/271 (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Varavin Ye.V., Kozlova M.V., Rakhimberdinova M.U., Ozpence O. The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on the Structural Transformation of Kazakhstan's Economy. Economy: strategy and practice. 2026;21(1):110-127. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51176/1997-9967-2026-1-110-127
JATS XML


















