Preview

Economy: strategy and practice

Кеңейтілген іздеу

Өнер нарығындағы құндылыққа бағытталған тұтынушы мінез-құлқы: мінез-құлық экономикалық көзқарас

https://doi.org/10.51176/1997-9967-2026-2-55-69

Толық мәтін:

Аңдатпа

In the context of the transformation of consumer behavior and the growing importance of intangible assets, the study of factors determining recommendation behavior in the art market is becoming particularly relevant. The purpose of this study is to identify the influence of consumer values on the recommendation behavior of consumers in the art market, taking into account the mediating role of hedonic and eudaimonic happiness. An online survey was conducted with 342 MZ generation respondents. Five consumption values (functional, emotional, social, epistemic, and ethical) were measured along with two types of happiness and word-of-mouth (hereinafter WOM). Structural equation modeling and bootstrapping were used to test the hypothesized relationships and mediating effects. The analysis results show that social (β = 0.284; p < 0.001), epistemic (β = 0.205; p < 0.001) and ethical (β = 0.229; p < 0.001) values have a significant impact on eudaimonic happiness, while emotional (β = 0.240; p < 0.001) and social (β = 0.289; p < 0.001) values significantly affect hedonic happiness. The study identifies dual hedonic and eudaimonic pathways through which consumption values shape WOM in the arts retail context. The results obtained confirm that consumer happiness is a key behavioral mechanism for the transformation of consumer values into recommendatory behavior, which is important for developing strategies for the development of the art market and improving the effectiveness of marketing communications.

Авторлар туралы

Х. Янг
Юлджи университеті
Солтүстік Корея

Янг Х. – PhD докторант

Суджон-гу, Соннамси, Кенгидо



С. Парк
Юлджи университеті
Солтүстік Корея

Парк С. – PhD, қауымдастырылған профессор

Суджон-гу, Соннамси, Кенгидо



Әдебиет тізімі

1. Alba, J. W., & Williams, E. F. (2013). Pleasure principles: A review of research on hedonic consumption. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23(1), 2–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2012.07.003

2. Allsop, D. T., Bassett, B. R., & Hoskins, J. A. (2007). Word-of-mouth research: Principles and applications. Journal of Advertising Research, 47(4), 398–411. https://doi.org/10.2501/S0021849907070419

3. Alzate, M., Arce-Urriza, M., & Cebollada, J. (2021). Online reviews and product sales: The role of review visibility. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 16(4), 638–669. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16040038

4. Anderson, E. W. (1998). Customer satisfaction and word of mouth. Journal of Service Research, 1(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/109467059800100102

5. Bai, H. , & Kim, J. H. (2024). Unveiling the Power of Private Label Charm in Distribution: How Cues Shape Korean and Chinese Consumers' Consumption Value and Repurchase Intentions. Journal of Distribution Science, 22(8), 87-98. https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.22.08.202408.87

6. Bagozzi, R. P., Gopinath, M., & Nyer, P. U. (1999). The role of emotions in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(2), 184–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070399272005

7. Bank of Korea. (2022). Financial stability report. Retrieved April 15, 2026, from https://www.bok.or.kr

8. Bilgihan, A. (2016). Gen Y customer loyalty in online shopping: An integrated model of trust, user experience, and branding. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 103– 113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.014

9. Choi, Y. J. (2022). A study on the value-oriented consumption of MZ generation in the digital age. Korea Consumer Agency.

10. Cui, X., Xie, Q., Zhu, J., Shareef, M. A., Goraya, M. A. S., & Akram, M. S. (2022). Understanding the omnichannel customer journey: The effect of online and offline channel interactivity on consumer value cocreation behavior. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 65, 102869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102869

11. Desmeules, R. (2002). The impact of variety on consumer happiness: Marketing and the tyranny of freedom. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 12, 1–18. https://www.ams-web.org/page/OriginalAMSR/articles/desmeules12-2002.pdf

12. Feng, L., Yuan, H., Ye, Q., Qian, Y., & Ge, X. (2024). Exploring the impacts of a recommendation system on an e-platform based on consumers’ online behavioral data. Information & Management, 61(2), 103905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2023.103905

13. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104

14. Gallarza, M. G., & Saura, I. G. (2006). Value dimensions, perceived value, satisfaction, and loyalty: An investigation of university students’ travel behaviour. Tourism Management, 27(3), 437–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2005.10.003

15. Guo, J., & Li, L. (2022). Exploring the relationship between social commerce features and consumers’ repurchase intentions: The mediating role of perceived value. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 775056. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.775056

16. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.

17. Harrison, R., & Loureiro, S. M. C. (2020). Experiential marketing and consumer happiness: The role of consumption values in the cinema industry. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 28(5), 447–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2018.1482945

18. Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., Walsh, G., & Gremler, D. D. (2004). Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the internet? Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(1), 38–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.10073

19. Hollebeek, L. D. (2011). Demystifying customer brand engagement: Exploring the loyalty nexus. Journal of Marketing Management, 27(7–8), 785–807. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2010.500132

20. Holbrook, M. B. (2005). Consumer value: A framework for analysis and research. Routledge.

21. Huta, V. (2016). Eudaimonic and hedonic orientations: Theoretical considerations and research findings. In J. Vittersø (Ed.), Handbook of eudaimonic well-being (pp. 215–231). Springer.

22. Huta, V., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). Pursuing pleasure or virtue: The differential and overlapping well-being benefits of hedonic and eudaimonic motives. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(6), 735–762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-009-9171-4

23. Jeong, S.H. (2023). Behavioral analysis of MZ generation beauty consumers: Focusing on value consumption and funsumer consumption. Journal of the Korean Society of Cosmetology, 29(1), 115–123. https://doi.org/10.52660/JKSC.2023.29.1.115

24. Kang, S., & Kim, S. (2025). Beyond revenge spending: Exploring the role of loneliness and online brand equity in sustained luxury consumption among Asian MZ adults. Asia Marketing Journal, 27(1), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.53728/2765-6500.1644

25. McCarthy, K. F., Ondaatje, E. H., Zakaras, L., & Brooks, A. (2001). Gifts of the muse: Reframing the debate about the benefits of the arts. RAND Corporation.

26. Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism. (2019). National survey on cultural participation. Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism.

27. Nguyen, N.D.T., Ngo, T.P., Mai, N.V., & Tra, K. N. (2022). Distribution of Brand Love, Brand Coolness, Self-brand Connections and Word-of-mouth Toward the Retail Format of Starbuck in Ho Chi Minh City. Journal of Distribution Science, 20(7), 87-95. https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.20.07.202207.87

28. Pham, H. T., Hoang, K. T., Nguyen, T. T., Huyen, P., & Mar, M. T. C. (2021). Sharing economy: Generation Z’s intention toward online fashion rental in Vietnam. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(3), 997–1007. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no3.0997

29. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141

30. Ryan, R. M., Huta, V., & Deci, E. L. (2008). Living well: A self-determination theory perspective on eudaimonia. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(1), 139–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-006-9023-4

31. Sang, V. M., Thanh, T. N. P., Gia, H. N., Nguyen Quoc, D., Long, K. L., & Yen, V. P. T. (2024). Impact of user-generated content in digital platforms on purchase intention: The mediator role of user emotion in the electronic product industry. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2414860. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2414860

32. Senecal, S., & Nantel, J. (2004). The influence of online product recommendations on consumers’ online choices. Journal of Retailing, 80(2), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2004.04.001

33. Sheth, J. N., Newman, B. I., & Gross, B. L. (1991). Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values. Journal of Business Research, 22(2), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(91)90050-8

34. Sigurdsson, V., Larsen, N. M., Alemu, M. H., Gallogly, J. K., Menon, R. V., & Fagerstrøm, A. (2020). Assisting sustainable food consumption: The effects of quality signals stemming from consumers and stores in online and physical grocery retailing. Journal of Business Research, 112, 458–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.029

35. Smith, J. B. (1996). Buyer–seller relationships: Bonds, relationship management, and sex-type. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 13(3), 264–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1936-4490.1998.tb00153.x

36. Srivastava, M., Abhishek, S., & Pandey, N. (2025). Electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) and customer brand engagement (CBE): Do they really go hand-in-hand? Electronic Commerce Research, 25(3), 1865–1933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-023-09743-z

37. Sweeney, J. C., & Soutar, G. N. (2001). Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale. Journal of Retailing, 77(2), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00041-0

38. Waterman, A. S. (1993). Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(4), 678–691. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.4.678

39. Williams, P., &Aaker, J. L. (2002). Can mixed emotions peacefully coexist? Journal of Consumer Research, 28(4), 636–649. https://doi.org/10.1086/338620

40. Xq, L., Dashuai, R., & Zhen, J. (2021). Influence of social interaction on the purchase behavior of social commerce consumers. Human Systems Management, 40(6), 917–935. https://doi.org/10.3233/HSM-19080

41. Yan, X., & Hu, H. (2023). New product demand forecasting and production capacity adjustment strategies: Within-product and cross-product word-of-mouth. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 182, 109394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2023.109394

42. Yang, Y., Li, X., Zeng, D., & Jansen, B. J. (2018). Aggregate effects of advertising decisions: A complex systems look at search engine advertising via an experimental study. Internet Research, 28(4), 1079–1102. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-10-2017-0377


Рецензия

Дәйектеу үшін:


Янг Х., Парк С. Өнер нарығындағы құндылыққа бағытталған тұтынушы мінез-құлқы: мінез-құлық экономикалық көзқарас. Economy: strategy and practice. 2026;21(2):55-69. https://doi.org/10.51176/1997-9967-2026-2-55-69

For citation:


Yang H., Park S. Value-Driven Consumer Behavior in the Art Retail Market: A Behavioral Economics Approach. Economy: strategy and practice. 2026;21(2):55-69. https://doi.org/10.51176/1997-9967-2026-2-55-69

Қараулар: 29

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
Контент доступен под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International.


ISSN 1997-9967 (Print)
ISSN 2663-550X (Online)