Технологиялық адами капитал жəне ұйымдастырушылық міндеттеме: Венгрия жұмысшылары туралы мəліметтер
https://doi.org/10.51176/1997-9967-2026-2-70-84
Аңдатпа
In the context of digital transformation and accelerated technological development, employees' competitiveness is increasingly determined not only by professional knowledge but also by the ability to master new technologies, adapt to change, and continuously develop their competencies. This study aimed to explore how technological competencies, openness to learning, adaptability, and willingness to retrain are interrelated and how these factors influence employees’ organizational commitment. The methodological basis of the study was exploratory factor analysis, evaluation of scale reliability using Cronbach's alpha, Pearson correlation analysis, and linear regression analysis. The empirical basis of the study was an online survey of 281 employees of small and medium-sized enterprises in Hungary conducted in January 2026. The results empirically supported the hypothesis that technological competence, learning orientation, adaptability, and willingness to retrain are integrated into a single adaptive technological human capital (hereinafter ATHC) index (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.837). ATHC showed a strong, positive relationship with affective organizational commitment (r = 0.758; p < 0.001) and explained 57.4% of its variance. However, a weak but significant positive relationship was found for continuance organizational commitment (r = 0.220; p < 0.001), which did not support the theoretically hypothesized negative relationship. The results indicate that developing adaptive technological human capital can not only enhance employees’ employability and adaptability but also contribute to organizational competitiveness by increasing organizational commitment. Thus, in the digital economy, adaptive technological human capital is an important resource for enhancing employee resilience, strengthening organizational commitment, and ensuring long-term organizational competitiveness.
Авторлар туралы
П. КарачониСловакия
Карачони П. – PhD, профессор
Комарно
П. Хузка
Венгрия
Хузка П. – PhD, қауымдастырылған профессор
Дьер
Әдебиет тізімі
1. Autor, D. H. (2015). Why Are There Still So Many Jobs? The History and Future of Workplace Automation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(3), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.29.3.3
2. Autor, D. H., Levy, F., & Murnane, R. J. (2003). The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An Empirical Exploration. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4), 1279–1333. https://doi.org/10.3386/W8337
3. Bartlett, K. R. (2001). The relationship between training and organizational commitment: A study in the health care field. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 12(4), 335–352. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.1001
4. Becker, G.S. (1975). Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education, (2nd ed), National Bureau of Economic Research.
5. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life. John Wiley & Sons.
6. Drucker, P. F. (1993). From capitalism to knowledge society. Post-Capitalist Society, (pp.17–42).Butterworth-Heinemann. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-7506-0921-0.50006-9
7. Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500–507. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500
8. Fugate, M., Kinicki, A. J., & Ashforth, B. E. (2004). Employability: A psycho-social construct, its dimensions, and applications. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65(1), 14–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2003.10.005
9. Gruman, J. A., & Saks, A. M. (2011). Performance management and employee engagement. Human Resource Management Review, 21(2), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2010.09.004
10. Illeris, K. (2003). Towards a contemporary and comprehensive theory of learning. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 22(4), 396–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370304837
11. Kyndt, E., Dochy, F., Michielsen, M., & Moeyaert, B. (2009). Employee Retention: Organisational and Personal Perspectives. Vocations and Learning, 2(3), 195–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-009-9024-7
12. Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-z
13. Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, Continuance, and Normative Commitment to the Organization: A Metaanalysis of Antecedents, Correlates, and Consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(1), 20–52. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1842
14. Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2010). Human capital and objective indicators of career success: The mediating effects of cognitive ability and conscientiousness. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(1), 207–235. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317909x414584
15. Noe, R. A., Clarke, A. D. M., & Klein, H. J. (2014). Learning in the Twenty-First-Century Workplace. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 245–275. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091321
16. Novotná, M., Maříková, M., & Smejkal, A. (2023). Influence of education on entrepreneurship. Acta Oeconomica Universitatis Selye, 12(1), 37-54. https://doi.org/10.36007/Acta.2023.12.1.4
17. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
18. OECD. (2023). OECD Employment Outlook 2023: Artificial Intelligence and the Labour Market. OECD Publishing.
19. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
20. Powell, D. M., & Meyer, J. P. (2004). Side-bet theory and the three-component model of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65(1), 157–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0001-8791(03)00050-2
21. Psacharopoulos, G., & Schultz, T. W. (1972). Investment in Human Capital. Economica, 39(155), 333. https://doi.org/10.2307/2551855
22. Rudolph, C. W., Lavigne, K. N., & Zacher, H. (2017). Career adaptability: A meta-analysis of relationships with measures of adaptivity, adapting responses, and adaptation results. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 98, 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2016.09.002
23. Savickas, M. L. (1997). Career Adaptability: An Integrative Construct for Life-Span, Life-Space Theory. The Career Development Quarterly, 45(3), 247–259. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.1997.tb00469.x
24. Schwab, K. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. World Economic Forum.
25. Thurow, L. C., & Mincer, J. (1976). Schooling, Experience, and Earnings. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 29(3), 454-456. https://doi.org/10.2307/2521600
26. van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2020). Determinants of 21st-Century Skills and 21st-Century Digital Skills for Workers: A Systematic Literature Review. SАGE Open, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019900176
27. Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M., & Liden, R. C. (1997). Perceived Organizational Support and Leader-Member Exchange: A Social Exchange Perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 82–111. https://doi.org/10.2307/257021
28. World Economic Forum. (2023). The future of jobs report 2023. Retrieved April 15, 2026 from https://www.weforum.org/publications/the-future-of-jobs-report-2023
Рецензия
Дәйектеу үшін:
Карачони П., Хузка П. Технологиялық адами капитал жəне ұйымдастырушылық міндеттеме: Венгрия жұмысшылары туралы мəліметтер. Economy: strategy and practice. 2026;21(2):70-84. https://doi.org/10.51176/1997-9967-2026-2-70-84
For citation:
Karacsony P., Huszka P. Technological Human Capital and Organizational Commitment: Evidence from Hungarian Employees. Economy: strategy and practice. 2026;21(2):70-84. https://doi.org/10.51176/1997-9967-2026-2-70-84
JATS XML


















