Ақылды қала менеджментінің цифрлық трансформациясындағы жасанды интеллект: библиометриялық талдау

Стремительное внедрение искусственного интеллекта в системы управления умными городами меняет подходы к городскому планированию, предоставлению общественных услуг и принятию управленческих решений, однако научные исследования в этой области остаются тематически и дисциплинарно разрозненными. Цель настоящего исследования систематизировать научную литературу о роли искусственного интеллекта в цифровой трансформации управления умными городами. В работе применены методы библиометрического и сетевого анализа, включая анализ динамики публикаций и цитирования, соавторства, библиографического сопряжения организаций и совместной встречаемости ключевых слов. Отбор публикаций осуществлялся в соответствии с принципами PRISMA 2020, а построение и визуализация библиометрических сетей — с использованием программы VOSviewer. Исходные данные получены из базы Scopus 5 октября 2025 года. Первоначальный поиск выявил 34 548 документов. После применения критериев предметной области, периода публикации, типа документа и языка в итоговую выборку вошли 1 865 англоязычных журнальных статей, опубликованных в 2015–2025 годах. Наибольшее количество публикаций приходится на Китай — 236 статей (12.7%), Великобританию — 230 (12.3%) и США — 216 (11.6%). Казахстан занимает 54-е место с девятью публикациями. Наиболее продуктивным журналом является Sustainability — 254 статьи, за ним следуют Sustainable Cities and Society — 134 и Cities — 122 статьи. Результаты показывают устойчивый рост научного интереса к теме после 2019 года и одновременно свидетельствуют о недостаточной развитости межрегионального научного сотрудничества и исследований этических, институциональных и общественных аспектов применения искусственного интеллекта в городском управлении.

1. Ahad, M. A., Paiva, S., Tripathi, G., & Feroz, N. (2020). Enabling technologies and sustainable smart cities. Sustainable Cities and Society, 61, 102301. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102301

2. Ahvenniemi, H., Huovila, A., Pinto-Seppä, I., & Airaksinen, M. (2017). What are the differences between sustainable and smart cities?. Cities, 60, 234-245. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.09.009

3. Akgün, E. Z., Gerli, P., Mora, L., & McTigue, C. (2024). Breaking barriers for breaking ground: A categorisation of public sector challenges to smart city project implementation. Public Policy and Administration, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/09520767241263233

4. Albino, V., Berardi, U., & Dangelico, R. M. (2015). Smart cities: Definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives. Journal of Urban Technology, 22(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2014.942092

5. Allam, Z., & Dhunny, Z. A. (2019). On big data, artificial intelligence and smart cities. Cities, 89, 80-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.01.032

6. Almulhim, A. I. (2025). Integrating artificial intelligence into smart infrastructure management for sustainable urban planning. Technologies, 13(11), 481. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies13110481

7. Alrasbi, O., & Ariaratnam, S. T. (2026). The Organizational Transformation of Artificial Intelligence in Smart Cities: An Urban Artificial Intelligence Governance Maturity Model. Urban Science, 10(1), 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci10010063

8. Angelidou, M. (2015). Smart cities: A conjuncture of four forces. Cities, 47, 95-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. cities.2015.05.004

9. Appio, F. P., Lima, M., & Paroutis, S. (2019). Understanding Smart Cities: Innovation ecosystems, technological advancements, and societal challenges. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 142, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.12.018

10. Burlacu, S., Popescu, M. L., Diaconu, A., & Sârbu, A. (2021). Digital public administration for sustainable development. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 10(4), 33-33. https://doi.org/10.14207/ ejsd.2021.v10n4p33

11. Cardona-Arenas, C. D., & Campuzano, J. A. (2024). Exploring citizen participation in fiscal control: insights from Manizales, Colombia. European Journal of Government and Economics, 13(1), 29-47. https://doi. org/10.17979/ejge.2024.13.1.9953

12. Cocchia, A. (2014). Smart and digital city: A systematic literature review. Smart City, 13-43. https:// doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06160-3_2

13. Dagher, G. G., Mohler, J., Milojkovic, M., & Marella, P. B. (2018). Ancile: Privacy-preserving framework for access control and interoperability of electronic health records using blockchain technology. Sustainable Cities and Society, 39, 283-297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. scs.2018.02.014

14. De Jong, M., Joss, S., Schraven, D., Zhan, C., & Weijnen, M. (2015). Sustainable–smart–resilient– low carbon–eco–knowledge cities; making sense of a multitude of concepts promoting sustainable urbanization. Journal of Cleaner Production, 109, 25-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.004

15. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jbusres.2021.04.070

16. Gil, I. A., Ferreira, F. A., Ferreira, N. C., Smarandache, F., Khanam, M., & Daim, T. (2026). Artificial intelligence, society 5.0 and smart city adaptation initiatives for businesses: An integrated approach. Technovation, 150, 103377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. technovation.2025.103377

17. Han, Z., Xie, W., Yu, H., Xie, H., Li, Y., & Wang, Y. (2024). Rethinking industrial land-use in American rust cities towards sustainability based on a block-level model. Journal of Environmental Management, 352, 120067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120067

18. Kireyeva, A. A., Satpayeva, Z. T. S., & Urdabayev, M. T. (2022). Analysis of the Digital Readiness and the Level of the ICT Development in Kazakhstan’s Regions. Economy of Regions, 18(2), 464–478. https://doi. org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2022-2-12

19. Kong, L., & Chen, J. (2025). Impact of digital transformation on green and sustainable innovation in business: a quasi-natural experiment based on smart city pilot policies in China. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 27(10), 24629–24657. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10668-024-05643-w

20. Meijer, A., & Bolívar, M. P. R. (2016). Governing the smart city: a review of the literature on smart urban governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(2), 392-408. https://doi. org/10.1177/0020852314564308

21. Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002

22. Moreno, C., Allam, Z., Chabaud, D., Gall, C., & Pratlong, F. (2021). Introducing the “15-Minute City”: Sustainability, resilience and place identity in future post-pandemic cities. Smart cities, 4(1), 93-111. https:// doi.org/10.3390/smartcities4010006

23. Page, M.J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P.M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T.C., Mulrow, C.D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J.M., Akl, E.A., Brennan, S.E., Chou, R., Glanville, J.M., Grimshaw, J.M., Hrõbjartsson, A., Lalu, M.M., Li, T., Loder, E.W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L.A., Stewart, L.A., Thomas, J., Tricco, A.C., Welch, V.A., Whiting, P.F., & McKenzie, J.E. (2020). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. The BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/ bmj.n71

24. Rouky, N., Benmoussa, O., Fri, M., Abourraja, M. N., & Ben-Bouazza, F. E. (2025). Artificial intelligence applications for smart and sustainable mobility as a service concept: a systematic literature review. Future Transportation, 5(3), 122. https://doi.org/10.3390/ futuretransp5030122

25. Scholl, H. J., & AlAwadhi, S. (2016). Smart governance as key to multi-jurisdictional smart city initiatives: The case of the eCityGov Alliance. Social Science Information, 55(2), 255–277. https://doi. org/10.1177/0539018416629230

26. Sgambati, S., & Gargiulo, C. (2022). The evolution of urban competitiveness studies over the past 30 years. A bibliometric analysis. Cities, 128, 103811. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103811

27. Shelton, T., Zook, M., & Wiig, A. (2015). The ‘actually existing smart city’. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(1), 13-25. https://doi. org/10.1093/cjres/rsu026

28. Sun, T. Q., & Medaglia, R. (2019). Mapping the challenges of Artificial Intelligence in the public sector: Evidence from public healthcare. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 368-383. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.09.008

29. Twizeyimana, J. D., & Andersson, A. (2019). The public value of E-Government–A literature review. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 167-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.01.001

30. Van Eck, N., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-

31. Van Eck, N., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3

32. Villani, L., Gugliermetti, L., Barucco, M. A., & Cinquepalmi, F. (2025). A Digital Twin Framework to Improve Urban Sustainability and Resiliency: The Case Study of Venice. Land, 14(1), 83. https://doi.org/10.3390/ land14010083

33. Wirtz, B. W., & Weyerer, J. C. (2023). Artificial intelligence in the public sector. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance (pp. 615-621). Springer. https:// doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66252-3_3701

34. Yigitcanlar, T., & Cugurullo, F. (2020). The sustainability of artificial intelligence: An urbanistic viewpoint from the lens of smart and sustainable cities. Sustainability, 12(20), 8548. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su12208548