Preview

Economics: the strategy and practice

Advanced search

Reform of State-Owned Enterprises – New Threats and New Opportunities for the Development of Uzbekistan’s Economy

https://doi.org/10.51176/1997-9967-2022-3-195-209

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to identify new threats and opportunities in the reform of state-owned enterprises in Uzbekistan to improve the efficiency of state-owned enterprises and the national economy as a whole. In the course of this study, the problem of corruption, methods of reforming state enterprises in developing countries, their consequences and directions of development were studied. And also, a critical view is given and recommendations are proposed for the reform of state-owned enterprises in the domestic economy. Based on the results of the analysis and analysis of state programs, special problems were identified in state-owned enterprises in the field of subsoil use, extractive industries and the activities of enterprises with a state share. The results of the study indicate the need to strengthen supervision over the activities of state-owned enterprises, since their profitability or unprofitability directly affects the degree of associated fiscal risks. State- owned enterprises often perform quasi-fiscal functions, attracting funds from both the state budget and external sources to finance industry projects. In the field of reforming state-owned enterprises of Uzbekistan, key conclusions have been made regarding the communication to the public, the goals, objectives and the need for ongoing transformations. There is no doubt that the reform of state-owned enterprises requires significant changes in legislation in the field of antimonopoly regulation and protection of competition, the banking and financial system, improving the protection of private property and consumer rights, social protection of the most vulnerable segments of the population and the unemployed.

About the Authors

A. F. Rasulev
Tashkent State University of Economics
Uzbekistan

Alisher F. Rasulev - Doctor of economic sciences, professor

Scopus ID: 57190430787

49 Islam Karimov Str., 100066, Tashkent



P. Zh. Orynbet
K. Sagadiev University of International Business
Kazakhstan

Perizat Zh. Orynbet – PhD

Scopus Author ID: 57219234394

8A Abay Ave., 050010, Almaty



S. A. Voronin
Tashkent Branch of Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
Uzbekistan

Sergey A. Voronin - Doctor of Economics science, professor

3 Shakhriobod Str., 100164, Tashkent



B. E. Mamarakhimov
Tashkent State University of Economics
Uzbekistan

Bekzod E. Mamarakhimov - Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor

49 Islam Karimov Str., 100066, Tashkent



References

1. Apriliyanti, I. D., & Kristiansen, S. (2019). The logics of political business in state-owned enterprises: the case of Indonesia. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 14, 709-730. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-08-2018-0433

2. Baer, W., & Trebat, T. J. (1983). Brazil’s State-Owned Enterprises: A Case Study of the State as Entrepreneur. Americas, 66, 420-421. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182168-66.2.420

3. Bajona, C., & Chu, T. (2010). Reforming state owned enterprises in China: Effects of WTO accession. Review of Economic Dynamics, 13(4), 800-823. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RED.2009.07.003

4. Bhatta, G. (2019). “Those That Fix the Lights”: The Practice of Public Sector Management in Developing Asia. Routledge.

5. Bernier, L., Florio, M., & Bance, P. (Eds.). (2020). The Routledge handbook of state-owned enterprises. Routledge.

6. Efird, B., Lester, L., & Wise, B. P. (2016). Analyzing coalitions in China’s policy formulation: reforming the role of state owned enterprises in China’s energy sector–erratum. Journal of East Asian Studies, 16, 303-306.

7. Taghizadeh-hesary, F., Yoshino, N., Kim, C. J., & Kim, K. (2021). Reforming State-Owned Enterprises in Asia. Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8574-6

8. Gil-López, Á., Arzubiaga, U., Román, E. S., & De Massis, A. (2020). The Visible Hand of corporate entrepreneurship in state-owned enterprises: a longitudinal study of the Spanish National Postal Operator. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 18, 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-020-00700-y

9. Hendarto, T., Nurjaya, I. N., Djatmika, P., & Madjid, A. (2021). The Meaning of Corporate Oversight of State-Owned Enterprises as Condition of Criminal Liability. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 7(11), 619-628. https://doi.org/10.18415/IJMMU.V7I11.2261

10. Hickey, W. (2020). Reforming State-Owned Enterprises. In The Sovereignty Game (pp. 85-97). Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore.

11. Huang, L. J., & Snell, R. S. (2003). Turnaround, corruption and mediocrity: Leadership and governance in three state owned enterprises in Mainland China. Journal of Business Ethics, 43(1), 111-124. https://doi.org/10.1023/A%3A1022919418838

12. Junqueira, C. A., & Abrantes, E. A. (2016). Brazil: State-owned enterprises. International financial law review, 35(36), 36-36.

13. Khan, F. U., Zhang, J., Usman, M., Badulescu, A., & Sial, M. S. (2019). Ownership Reduction in state-owned enterprises and corporate social responsibility: Perspective from secondary privatization in China. Sustainability, 11(4), 1008-1023. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041008

14. Kiranmai, J., & Mishra, R. K. (2019). Corporate Governance Practices in Listed Stateowned Enterprises in India: An Empirical Research. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 12(1), 94-121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974686219849760

15. Kumar, S. (2018). MoU System in State-owned Enterprises in India: A Tool in Strategic Management. Indian Journal of Public Administration, 64(1), 36-48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0019556117735460

16. Li, D. D., & Wu, C. (2002). Reforming state-owned enterprises: diversifying ownership versus improving management. In The management of enterprises in the People’s Republic of China (pp. 79-98). Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1095-6_5

17. Perkins, D. H. (1993). Summary: Why is reforming state-owned enterprises so difficult? China Economic Review, 4 (2), 149-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/1043-951X%2893%2990016-S

18. Silvestre, H. C., Gomes, R. C., & Miorin G. R. (2018). The Institutional Settings for the Development of Public Services through State-Owned Enterprises in Brazil. International Journal of Public Administration, 41(1), 59-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2016.1247368

19. Wachira, R. W. (2003). Response of state owned enterprises to corporate governance reforms (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nairobi.).

20. Glinkina, S. P. (2004). The results of privatization in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe. Property Management [Upravlenie sobstvennost›ju], 2, 33-43. (in Russ)

21. Decree of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan. On measures to further accelerate the processes of privatization of state assets. National Database of Legislation of the Republic of Uzbekistan [Nacional’naja baza dannyh zakonodatel’stva Respubliki Uzbekistan], (2020). [updated October 27, 2020; cited March 30, 2022]. Available: https://lex.uz/uz/docs/5068826 (in Russ)

22. Khamidulin, M. B. (2020). Regions in the strategies of international interaction and cooperation of the EAEU countries and other countries of Greater Eurasia. Greater Eurasia: development, security, cooperation [Bol’shaja Evrazija: Razvitie, bezopasnost’, sotrudnichestvo], (3-2), 927-930. (in Russ)


Review

For citations:


Rasulev A.F., Orynbet P.Zh., Voronin S.A., Mamarakhimov B.E. Reform of State-Owned Enterprises – New Threats and New Opportunities for the Development of Uzbekistan’s Economy. Economics: the strategy and practice. 2022;17(3):195-209. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51176/1997-9967-2022-3-195-209

Views: 354


ISSN 1997-9967 (Print)
ISSN 2663-550X (Online)