Methods and Practice of Assessing the Level of Inclusive Regional Development of Kazakhstan

In Kazakhstan, the inequality of economic, social, and innovative development of regions and the population has increased in recent years. The purpose of this work is to assess the level of differences between Kazakhstan’s regions in social, economic, innovative and infrastructural inclusivity and to offer recommendations for reducing regional inequality. The methods of comparative analysis, economic and statistical, generalizations, index, matrix, typology, absolute and relative indicators of inclusiveness are used. The author’s methodological approach is applied based on the index method and ranking. The study hypothesis is that the high level of economic inequality in the regions determines the high level of differences in the sphere of social inclusion, innovation and inclusion in the sphere of infrastructure. Calculations of private and integral indices showed that the differences in social inclusivity of the regions amounted to 3.37 times; economic inclusivity – 7.45; infrastructure – 2.96; innovation – 6.67. A matrix of regional inclusive development has been formed based on the gradation of assessments. The conclusion is made about the contradictory picture in the levels of inclusiveness of economic, social and innovative development of the regions of Kazakhstan. The proposed methodology can be expanded and optimized for regions, population groups, and specific tasks in the field of inclusive growth. Recommendations have been developed to improve Kazakhstan’s regional policy, reform the tax system, and increase the budget self-sufficiency of regions in the interests of inclusive development.

1. McKinley, T. (2010). Inclusive Growth Criteria and Indicators: An Inclusive Growth Index for Diagnosis of Country Progress. ADB Sustainable Development Working Paper Series No. 14. [cited October 14, 2023]. Available at: https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/28493/adb-wp14-inclusive-growth-criteria.pdf

2. Alieva, S., & Kovyazina, K. (2022). Index of inequality of access to high-quality secondary education. Soros Foundation-Kazakhstan. [cited October 14, 2023]. Available at: https://www.soros.kz/ru/index-of-inequality-in-access-to-quality-vtorichnoe-education_study

3. Bard , A., & Soderqvist, J. (2002). Netocracy: The New Power Elite and Life After Capitalism. London, UK: Financial Times Prentice Hall.

4. Center for Inclusive Growth (2020). Methodology. Data-driven insights to measure and track inclusive growth. [cited October 14, 2023]. Available at: https://inclusivegrowthscore.com/

5. EEC & UNCTAD (2019). Inclusive growth of the Eurasian Economic Union Member States: assessments and opportunities. [cited October 14, 2023]. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Steve-Macfeely/publication

6. Etherington, D., & Jones, M. (2004). Beyond Contradictions of the Workfare State? Denmark, Welfare-through-Work, and the Promise of Job Rotation. Environment and Planning C Government and Policy, 22(1), 129-148. https://doi.org/10.1068/c28m

7. EU. (2020). Multidimensional Inequality Monitoring Framework. [cited October 14, 2023]. Available at: https://composite-indicators.jrc.ec.europa.eu/multidimensional-inequality

8. Forbes Kazakhstan (2019). Rating of competitiveness of Kazakhstan regions. Available at: https://forbes.kz/leader/reyting_konkurentosposobnosti_regionov_kazahstana_1/

9. IMF (2013). Inclusive Growth: Measurement and Determinants. International Monetary Fund. [cited October 14, 2023]. Available at: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2013/wp13135.pdf

10. Khudajbergenov, O., & Idenov, S. (2022). Rating of regions of Kazakhstan, Center of strategic initiatives. [cited October 14, 2023]. Available at: http://csi.kz/page28950645.html

11. OECD (2009). Measuring Well-being and Progress: Well-being Research. [cited October 14, 2023]. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/wise/measuring-well-being-and-progress.htm#framework

12. OECD (2014). Report on the OECD framework for inclusive growth. [cited October 14, 2023]. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/mcm/IG_MCM_ENG.pdf

13. Osberg, L., & Sharpe, A. (2010). The Measurement of Economic Welfare. Challenge, 53(4), 25–42. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40722652

14. Pawluczuk, А., & Gamundani, А. (2021). Bridging the gender digital divide: an analysis of existing guidance for gender digital inclusion programs’ evaluations. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 23(3), 287-299. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-11-2020-0158

15. Ranieri, R., & Ramos, A. (2013). Inclusive growth: Building up a concept. Working Paper No.104. International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth. [cited October 14, 2023]. Available at: https://www.ipc-undp.org/pub/IPCWorkingPaper104.pdf

16. Salzman, J. (2003). Methodological Choices Encountered in the Construction of Composite Indices of Economic and Social Well-Being. [cited October 14, 2023]. Available at: http://www.csls.ca/events/cea2003/salzman-typol-cea2003.pdf

17. Sharafutdinov, R., Akhmetshin, E., Polyakova, A., Gerasimov, V., Shpakova, R., & Mikhailova, M. (2019). Inclusive Growth: A Dataset on Key and Institutional Foundations for Inclusive Development of Russian Regions. Data in Brief, 23, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2019.103864

18. Shearer, R., & Berube, A. (2017). The surprisingly short list of U.S. metro areas achieving inclusive economic growth. Brookings. [cited October 14, 2023]. Available at: https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/metro-monitor_full_af2.pdf

19. Shipton, D., & Sarica, S. (2021). Knowing the goal: an inclusive economy that can address the public health challenges of our time. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 75, 1129-1132. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2020-216070

20. Tarko, V. (2020). Simple rules for a more inclusive economy. European Journal of Law and Economics, 52(2), 229-249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-020-09674-2

21. WEF (2017). The Inclusive Growth and Development Report. [cited October 14, 2023]. Available at: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Forum_IncGrwth_2017.pdf

22. WEF (2018). Inclusive Growth and Development Report 2018. [cited October 14, 2023]. Available at: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Forum_Inc-Grwth_2018.pdf

23. World Bank (2016). World Development Report 2016: Digital Dividends. [cited October 14, 2023]. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0671-1

24. World Bank (2020a). Financial Inclusion, Europe and Central Asia Economic Report. [cited October 14, 2023]. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1409-9

25. World Bank (2020b). Shared Prosperity: Monitoring Inclusive Growth. [cited October 14, 2023]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1602-4_ch2