Evaluation of Technology Commercialization Factors in Kazakhstan

The commercialization of scientific research and development (R&D) results is a key driver for enhancing corporate revenues and profits, positively impacting economic development, and increasing global and national competitiveness. However, commercialization is a complex process influenced by various factors. This study aims to assess the mutual influence of commercialization factors of R&D in Kazakhstan and provide recommendations to strengthen positive influences and mitigate negative ones. Utilizing official data from the Bureau of National Statistics, including metrics such as enterprise innovation activity, the share of innovative products in GDP, patent numbers, R&D expenditures, industry innovation costs, and R&D personnel, a regression analysis was conducted using the time series method and the vector autoregression (VAR) approach. The analysis revealed that increased innovative activity of enterprises positively impacts the export of innovative products after three years but negatively affects the share of innovative products in GDP. Additionally, higher industry innovation costs and an increase in patent numbers lead to a rise in innovative product exports after three years. However, an increase in innovative product exports subsequently reduces patent numbers after three years. These results indicate that domestic enterprises focus primarily on expanding export-oriented products for short-term profit gains, reducing costs, and achieving immediate results, often at the expense of substantial innovation activities. The findings suggest a need for strategies to balance short-term profit motives with sustainable innovation investments to enhance long-term economic growth and competitiveness.

1. Alibekova G. (2014). Comparative analysis of the effectiveness of government funding for research and development (case of Kazakhstan and developed economies). Kazakh Economic Review, 1-2, 36-47.

2. Alibekova, G., Tleppaev, A., & Alzhanova, F. (2016). Econometric Evidence of the Effectiveness of Different R&D Funding Sources. Social Science Research Network, 10(4), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2732559

3. Acemoglu, D., Akcigit, U., & Kerr, W. (2016). Networks and the macroeconomy: An empirical exploration. Nber macroeconomics annual, 30(1), 273-335. https://doi.org/978-0-226-39560-9/2016/2015-0401$10.00

4. Bureau of National Statistics (2023). (accessed April 30, 2024). Available on: http://www.stat.gov.kz

5. Chesbrough, H., & Crowther, A. K. (2006). Be-yond High Tech: Early Adopters of Open Innovation in Other Industries. R&D Management, 36(3), 229-236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00428.x

6. Choi, J. I., Hong, K. P., Jang, S. K., & Bae, Y. G. (2017). Technology Commercialization of Research Institute Company: A Case of the KAERI's HemoHim. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 7(2), 129-140. https://doi.org/10.16972/apjbve.7.2.201207.129

7. Choi, Y. (2019). Promotion of SME Technology Commercialization and Networking. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 5(3), 65. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc5030065

8. Cooper, R. G. (2008). Perspective: The Stage-Gate® Idea-to-Launch Process—Update, What's New, and NexGen Systems. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(3), 213-232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2008.00296.x

9. Egeln, J., Gottschalk, S., Rammer, C., & Spielkamp, A. (2002). Public research spin-offs in Germany: summary report (No. 03-04). ZEW-Dokumentation.

10. Frederick, H. H., & Kuratko, D. F. (2010). Entrepreneurship (2nd Asia-Pacific ed.). Cengage Learning.

11. Gibson, C. S. (2011). Breaking Down Barriers to Technology Transfer: Reforming WTO Standard-Setting Rules and Establishing an Advisory Facility in Standard-Setting for Developing & Least Developed Countries. Sustainable Technology Trahsfer, Hans Henrik Lidgard, Jeffery Atik, Tu Thahn Nguyen, eds., Kluwer, Forthcoming, Suffolk University Law School Research Paper, (11-37).

12. Jungwook, B., Yunbae, K., Byungchul, L., Bodum, C., & Chanmin, P. (2009, August). Analysis of the fac-tors to affect technology transfer fee in the intellectual property management. In PICMET'09-2009 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology (pp. 2821-2833). IEEE.

13. Kang, J. M. (2013). The Effect of Open Innovation on Technology Commercialization Performance: A Case of BioPharmaceutical Industry (PhD Thesis). Sungkyunkwan University Graduate School, Seoul, Korea, 5(6), 65-84. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc5030065

14. Karaveg, C., Thawesaengskulthai, N., & Chandrachai, A. (2014). Evaluation Model for Research and Development Commercialisation Capability. Production & Manufacturing Research, 2(1), 586-602. https://doi.org/10.1080/21693277.2014.886086

15. Kriegesmann, B. (2020). Unternehmensgrundungen aus der Wissenschaft. Z Betr, 70, 397-414.

16. Kim, H. S., Kim, D. S., & Kim, H. I. (2009). An Empirical Study on Causal Relationship Between Performance Measures of Technology-Based Startup Firms. Product Review, 23(1), 553-569. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc5030065

17. Kumar, S., Luthra, S., Haleem, A., Mangla, S., & Garg, D. (2015). Identification and Evaluation of Critical Factors to Technology Transfer Using the AHP Approach. International Strategic Management Review, 3(1-2), 24-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ism.2015.09.001

18. Kusuma, C., Sutopo, W., Yuniaristanto, Y., & Hadiyono, S. (2015). Incubation Scheme of the University Spin-Off to Commercialize the Invention in Sebelas Maret University. Proceedings of the International MultiConference of Engineer and Computer Scientists (pp. 18-20). Hong Kong.

19. Lee, G.-W. (2012). Strengthening the Creation, Protection and Utilization of Intellectual Property. KIS-TI, Daejeon, Korea.

20. Lockett, A., Wright, M., & Franklin, S. (2003). Technology Transfer and Universities' Spin-Out Strategies. Small Business Economics, 20, 185-200. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022220216972

21. Mainelli, P. (2001). Managing Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Technology-Based Firms. John Wiley & Sons Inc.

22. Miller, K., McAdam, R., Moffett, S., & Brennan, M. (2011). An Exploratory Study of Retaining and Maintaining Knowledge in University Technology Transfer Processes. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 17(6), 663-684.

23. OECD/Eurostat. (2018). Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation (4th ed.). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264304604-en

24. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.

25. Somsuk, N., Punnakitikashem, P., & Laosirihong-thong, T. (2010, December). Determining enabling factors of university technology business incubation program: Resource-based view theory. In 2010 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (pp. 1032-1037). IEEE.

26. Scholten, V. E. (2006). The early growth of academic spin-offs:[factors influencing the early growth of Dutch spin-offs in the life sciences, ICT and consulting]. Wageningen University and Research.

27. Shane, S., & Stuart, T. (2002). Organizational Endowments and the Performance of University Start-Ups. Management Science, 48(1), 154-170. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.1.154.14280

28. Smilor, W., & Matthews, J. (2004). University Venturing: Technology Transfer and Commercialisation in Higher Education. International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialisation, 3(1), 111-128. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTTC.2004.003519

29. Sung, T. K. (2009). Technology Transfer in the IT Industry: A Korean Perspective. Technological Fore-casting and Social Change, 76(5), 700-708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2008.03.011

30. Sutopo, W., Astuti, R., & Suryandari, R. (2019). Accelerating a Technology Commercialization with a Discussion on the Relation Between Technology Transfer Efficiency and Open Innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 5(4), 95. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc5040095

31. Tidd, J., & Bessant, J. (2009). Managing Innovation (4th ed.). Wiley.

32. Vohora, A., Wright, M., & Lockett, A. (2004). Critical Junctures in the Development of University High-Tech Spinout Companies. Research Policy, 33(1), 147-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00107-0

33. Wicaksana, D. E. P., & Sutopo, W. (2015, November). Identification of incubation scheme by incubator in university innovation center to develop Indonesian economy. In Proceedings of the Joint International Conference on Electric Vehicular Technology and Industrial, Mechanical, Electrical and Chemical Engineering (ICEVT & IMECE) (pp. 292-297). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEVTIMECE.2015.7496696

34. Yang, Y., Wang, Y., Wang, C., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, C. (2022). Temporal and Spatial Evolution of the Science and Technology Innovative Efficiency of Regional Industrial Enterprises: A Data-Driven Perspective. Sustainability, 14(17), 10721. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710721

35. Yun, J.J., Jeong, E., Lee, Y., & Kim, K. (2018). The Effect of Open Innovation on Technology Value and Technology Transfer: A Comparative Analysis of Korea's Automotive, Robotics, and Aviation Industries. Sustainability, 10(7), 2459.