Тұрақты инновациялар және реттеу: орталықтандырылмаған және орталықтандырылған қаржының эко-жүйесі

Данное исследование посвящено продолжающейся дискуссии между децентрализованными финансами (DeFi) и централизованными финансами (CeFi), с акцентом на анализ их уникальных преимуществ и вызовов в условиях стремительно меняющегося финансового ландшафта. Целью исследования является обоснование необходимостм конвергенции DeFi и CeFi для создания инновационной и безопасной финансовой экосистемы, которая сочетает доступность и безопасность, используя Казахстан в качестве примера. В исследовании используется метод сравнительного анализа и метод кейс-стади для изучения подхода Казахстана к регулированию цифровых активов. Основное внимание уделяется вопросам лицензирования, реализации протоколов противодействия отмыванию денег (AML) и защите прав потребителей как ключевым факторам интеграции DeFi и CeFi. В качестве первичных данных используется анализ регуляторной базы Казахстана в области цифровых активов, а также статистические показатели внедрения AML-протоколов и уровня защиты потребителей. Результаты исследования показывают, что гибридная регуляторная модель эффективно устраняет различия в операционной деятельности DeFi и CeFi, способствуя инклюзивности и экономическому росту при защите интересов потребителей. Регуляторный акцент Казахстана на лицензировании и протоколах AML демонстрирует, что сбалансированный подход к регулированию может учитывать как технологический прогресс, так и необходимость защиты финансовых участников. Исследование делает вывод, что конвергенция DeFi и CeFi через гибридную регуляторную модель может заложить основу для устойчивой цифровой финансовой среды, которая будет доступной, инновационной и безопасной. В качестве перспективных направлений для дальнейших исследований рекомендуется изучение роли передовых технологий, таких как квантовые вычисления, а также анализ социально-экономических последствий интеграции DeFi и CeFi в контексте повышения финансовой инклюзивности для недостаточно обслуживаемых групп населения.

1. Adrian, T., & Mancini-Griffoli, T. (2019). The Rise of Digital Money. Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781498324908.063

2. Akcinaroglu, S., & Shi, M. (2023). Exploring the Impact of Cryptocurrency on Terrorism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2023.2275057

3. Alimzhanova, Z., Skublewska-Paszkowska, M., & Nazarbayev, D. (2023). Periodicity Detection of the Substitution Box in the CBC Mode of Operation: Experiment and Study. IEEE Access, 11, 75686-75695. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3295909

4. Bajpai, A.B. (2024). How Digital Finance and Fintech Can Improve Financial Inclusion? International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology, 4(1), 544-559. https://doi.org/10.48175/ijarsct-16987

5. Beisembay, Y., & Ernazarov, T. Y. (2021). Modern trends in the formation of economic and organizational foundations for the construction and development of the digital economy in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Economy: strategy and practice, 16(1), 93-105. https://doi.org/10.51176/JESP/vol_16_issue_1_T6

6. Benarous, A. M., Medeni, I. T., Medeni, T. D., & Ateş, V. (2024). Blockchain dynamic and macroeconomic impact on the stock market. Economy: strategy and practice, 19(2), 58-69. https://doi.org/10.51176/1997-9967-2024-2-58-69

7. Bordo, M. D., & Levin, A. T. (2017). Central bank digital currency and the future of monetary policy. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w23711

8. Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods. Oxford University Press.

9. Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance. (2019). Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index (CBECI). [cited October 15, 2024]. Available at: https://cbeci.org https://www.jbs.cam.ac.uk/2019/cambridge-bitcoin-electricity-consumption-index-cbeci

10. Casey, M., Crane, J., Gensler, G., Johnson, S., & Narula, N. (2018). The impact of blockchain technology on finance: A catalyst for change. [cited October 15, 2024]. Available at: https://cepr.org/publications/booksand-reports/geneva-21-impact-blockchain-technology-finance-catalyst-change

11. Chainalysis. (2024). Reports on cryptocurrency crime and adoption. [cited October 15, 2024]. Available at: https://www.chainalysis.com

12. Coin ATM Radar (2024). Number of Bitcoin ATMs worldwide from October 2013 to April 2024. In Statista. [cited October 15, 2024]. Available at: https://wwwstatista-com.liverpool.idm.oclc.org/statistics/343127/number-bitcoin-atms

13. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. London: Sage Publications.

14. Crosby, M., Nachiappan, Pattanayak, P., Verma, S., & Kalyanaraman, V. (2016). Blockchain technology: Beyond Bitcoin. Applied Innovation Review, 2, 6-19. https://scet.berkeley.edu/wp-content/uploads/AIR-2016-Blockchain.pdf

15. Deloitte. (2020). Deloitte’s perspectives on quantum computing and cryptography. [cited October 15, 2024]. Available at: https://www2.deloitte.com

16. Denzin, N. K. (2017). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315134543

17. Demirgüç-Kunt, A., Klapper, L., Singer, D., Ansar, S. & Hess, J. (2018). The Global Findex Database 2017: Measuring financial inclusion and the fintech revolution. World Bank Group. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-46481259-0

18. Digiconomist. (2023). Bitcoin average energy consumption per transaction compared to that of VISA as of May 1, 2023 (in kilowatt-hours). In Statista. [cited October 15, 2024]. Available at: https://www-statista-com.liverpool.idm.oclc.org/statistics/881541/bitcoin-energy-consumption-transaction-comparison-visa

19. Dingle, S. (2018). In math, we trust Bitcoin, cryptocurrency and the journey to being your own bank. Tracey McDonald Publishers.

20. Dingle, S., & Sidley S.B. (2022). Beyond Bitcoin: Decentralized finance and the end of banks. Icon Books.

21. Eisenberg, L., & Noe, T. H. (2001). Systemic risk in financial systems. Management Science, 47(2), 236-249. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.47.2.236.9835

22. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550. https://doi.org/10.2307/258557

23. Estecahandy, H. (2024). Geopolitics of cryptocurrency mining in Kazakhstan. Central Asian Survey, 43(3), 327-345. https://doi.org/10.1080/02634937.2024.2324192

24. Ethereum Foundation. (2022). The Merge: Ethereum’s transition to proof of stake. [cited October 15, 2024]. Available at: https://ethereum.org/en/roadmap/merge

25. EPCEU. (2016). Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data. Official Journal of the European Union, L119, 1-88. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj

26. Fernandez-Carames, T. M., & Fraga-Lamas, P. (2020). Towards post-quantum blockchain: A review on blockchain cryptography resistant to quantum computing attacks. IEEE Access, 8, 21091-21116. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2968985

27. FATF. (2021). Annual report 2020-2021. FATF-GAFI. [cited October 15, 2024]. Available at: https://www.fatf-gafi.org/content/dam/fatf-gafi/annual-reports/Annual-Report-2020-2021.pdf

28. Fu, S., Wang, Q., Yu, J., Chen, S. (2024). FTX Collapse: A Ponzi Story. In: Essex, A., et al. Financial Cryptography and Data Security. FC 2023 International Workshops. FC 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 13953, Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3031-48806-1_14

29. Glassnode. (2022). DeFi participation and sector volatility in the 2022 bear market. [cited October 15, 2024]. Available at: https://glassnode.com

30. Goetzmann, W.N. (2016). Money changes everything: How finance made civilization possible. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

31. Gramlich, V., Guggenberger, T., Principato, M., Schellinger, B., & Urbach, N. (2023). A multivocal literature review of decentralized finance: Current knowledge and future research avenues. Electronic Markets, 33(11). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-023-00637-4

32. Gumar, N. A., Zhanibekova, G. K., Imramziyeva, M. Y., Kabdeshova, A. A., & Isaeva, A. T. (2023). The impact of digital technologies on the efficiency of banking. Economy: strategy and practice, 18(3), 241-250. https://doi.org/10.51176/1997-9967-2023-3-241-250

33. Kaiyp, D.T., Zhartybayeva, M. G., & Oralbekova, Z. O. (2023). Methodological basis and experience of using data mining methods in trade. Economy: strategy and practice, 18(3), 268-283. https://doi.org/10.51176/1997-9967-2023-3-268-283 (In Kaz.)

34. Kapalova, N., Algazy, K., & Haumen, A. (2023). Development of a new lightweight encryption algorithm. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 9(123), 6-19. https://doi.org/10.15587/17294061.2023.280055

35. Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. London: Sage Publications.

36. Kumar, S., Jain, R., Narain, Balli, F., & Billah, M. (2023). Interconnectivity and investment strategies among commodity prices, cryptocurrencies, and G-20 capital markets: A comparative analysis during COVID-19 and Russian-Ukraine war. International Review of Economics & Finance, 88, 547-593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2023.06.039

37. Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.

38. Miles, D., Scott, A., & Breedon, F. (2012). Macroeconomics: understanding the global economy. John Wiley & Sons.

39. Mishra, A. K., Obaidat, M. S., Puthal, D., Tripathy, A. K., & Choo, K. K. R. (2018). Graph-based symmetric crypto-system for data confidentiality. In 2018 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/GLOCOM.2018.8647844

40. Moldabekova, A. T., Philipp, R., Akhmetova, Z. B., & Asanova, T. A. (2021). The role of digital technologies in the development of logistics in Kazakhstan in the formation of Industry 4.0. Economy: strategy and practice, 16(2), 164-177. https://doi.org/10.51176/1997-99672021-2-164-177 (In Russ.)

41. Mosca, M., & Piani, M. (2021). Quantum threat timeline report 2020. Global Risk Institute. [cited October 15, 2024]. Available at: https://globalriskinstitute.org/publications/quantum-threat-timeline-report-2020

42. Nekhili, R., Alomari, M., Mensi, W., & Sultan, J. (2024). Return spillovers between decentralized finance and centralized finance markets. Eurasian Economic Review, 14, 487-506. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40822-023-00260-w

43. Obstfeld, M., & Rogoff, K. (2009). Global imbalances and the financial crisis: Products of common causes. CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP7606. [cited October 15, 2024]. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1533211

44. Park, S., Lee, S., Lee, Y., Ko, H., Son, B., Lee, J., & Jang, H. (2022). Price co-movements in decentralized financial markets. Applied Economics Letters, 30(21), 3075-3082. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2022.2120952

45. Reinert, K.A. (2009). The Princeton Encyclopedia of the World Economy. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

46. Ricks, M. (2019). Money as infrastructure. Columbia Business Law Review, 2018(3), 757-851. https://doi.org/10.7916/cblr.v2018i3.1707.

47. Schuler, K., Cloots, A. S., & Schär, F. (2024). On DeFi and On-Chain CeFi: How (Not) to Regulate Decentralized Finance. Journal of Financial Regulation, 10 (2), 213-242. https://doi.org/10.1093/jfr/fjad014

48. Schuler, K., Nadler, M., & Schär, F. (2023). Contagion and loss redistribution in crypto-asset markets. Economics Letters, 231, 111310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2023.111310

49. Statista. (2024a). Number of identity-verified cryptoasset users from 2016 to June 2024 (in millions). Statista. [cited October 15, 2024]. Available at: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1202503/global-cryptocurrency-user-base

50. Statista. (2024b). Energy consumption from Bitcoin compared to the total energy consumption in selected countries worldwide as of December 9, 2024. Statista. [cited October 15, 2024]. Available at: https://www.statista.com/statistics/881522/bitcoin-energy-consumption-relative-to-select-countries

51. Stake, R. E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. London: Sage Publications.

52. Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence‐informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207-222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375