Preview

Economics: the strategy and practice

Advanced search

Sustainable development of rural areas is the most important factor in ensuring social security

Abstract

The article examines the main factors of ensuring social security of the village on the basis of improving the social infrastructure of rural areas. The level of social threat to the development of rural areas is analyzed and the main problems of sustainable development of the agricultural complex, which is one of the basic prerequisites for the development of rural regions, are identified.

The purpose of the study is to develop the conceptual framework for sustainable rural development, to justify the essence and define the social security of rural areas, to determine the most important indicators that form the system of parameters of social security of sustainable rural development.

On the basis of the conducted research, methodical approaches to the assessment of social security of territorial systems are systematized, the assessment of internal threats to the socio-economic security of rural development is given. The most important indicators forming the system of parameters of social security of sustainable development of rural territories are determined.

About the Authors

B. S. Myrzalyiev

Kazakhstan


S. S. Nursymbat

Kazakhstan


M. Amanzhol

Kazakhstan


References

1. Maslow, Abraham Harold. (2013). Motivation and personality [Text] / Abraham Maslow; T. Gutman, N. Mukhina]. - 3rd ed. - Moscow [et al.]: Peter, 351.

2. Montesquieu & A. A. Krotov. (2010). New philosophical encyclopedia : in 4 vols. / PREV. science.- ed. of the Council V. S. Stepin. - 2nd ed., ISPR. and additional-M.: Thought., 2816.

3. J.-J. Rousseau: (2005) Pro et Contra [Ideas of Jean-Jacques Rousseau in the perception and evaluation of Russian thinkers and researchers (1752-1917). Anthology] / Compilers: A. A. Zlatopolskaya et al. - St. Petersburg.: Rhga publishing house, 798.

4. Rodachin V. M. (2004). Bezopasnost’ kak social’noe yavlenie/ Pravo i bezopasnost’., 4(13), 28.

5. Papers of the 89th Sess. (2001). of the Intern. labour conf., June 2001. Geneva: Intern. labour office, VI, 114.

6. Social security disability: (1996). Alternatives would boost: Cost-effectiveness of continuing disability: Rev.: Rep. to the chairman, Subcomm. on social security, Comm. on ways a. means, House of representatives. Washington: GAO, 112.

7. Shedenov U.K. (2016). Aleumettykekonomikalyk kauіpsіzdіktі baskaru//Oku kuraly.- Almaty,340 .

8. Kolennikova O. A. (2002). Rynochnye reformy i oslablenie bezopasnosti naseleniya Rossiya: 10 let reform. Social’no-demograficheskayasituaciya. M., 272–281.

9. Chmyhalo A. YU. (2007). Social’naya bezopasnost’: Uchebnoe posobie - Tomsk: Izd-vo TPU, 168.

10. Alderman, H. & Yemtsov, R. (2014). How can safety nets contribute to economic Growth? World Bank EconomicReview, 28(1): 1–20.

11. Ardington, C., Case, A. &Hosegood, V. (2009). Laborsupply responses to large social transfers: longitudinalevidence from South Africa. American EconomicJournal: Applied Economics, 1(1): 22–48.

12. Banerjee, A. & Duflo, E. (2007). The economic lives of the poor. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(1): 141–167.

13. Barrett, C.B. (2002). Food security and food assistanceprograms. In B. L. Gardner & G.C. Rausser, eds. Handbook of Agricultural Economics. Vol. 2B (2103– 2190). Amsterdam, Elsevier.

14. Berhane, G., Gilligan, D.O., Hoddinott, J., Kumar, N. & Taffesse, A.S. (2014). Can social protection work inAfrica? The impact of Ethiopia’s Productive SafetyNet Programme. Economic Development and CulturalChange, 63(1): 1–26.

15. Christiaensen, L., Demery, L. &Kuhl, J. 2011. The(evolving) role of agriculture in poverty reduction:an empirical perspective. Journal of Development Economics, 96(2): 239–254.

16. Fiszbein, A., Kanbur, R. &Yemtsov, R. 2014. Socialprotection and poverty reduction: global patterns andsome targets. World Development, 61: 167–177.

17. Hoddinott, J., Berhane, G., Gilligan, D.O., Kumar, N. & Taffesse, A.S. 2012. The impact of Ethiopia’sproductive safety net programme and related transfers on agricultural productivity. Journal of African

18. Jayne, T.S. & Rashid, S. 2013. Input programs in sub-Saharan Africa: a synthesis of recent evidence. Agricultural Economics, 44(6): 547–562.

19. Lunduka, R., Ricker-Gilbert, J. & Fisher, M. 2013.What are the farm-level impacts of Malawi’s farminput subsidy program? A critical review. AgriculturalEconomics, 44(6): 563–579.

20. Segizbaeva D. U. (2016). Kazastan Respublikasyndaqy aleumettіk- ekonomikalyk kauіpsіzdіk maselelerі // Molodoj uchenyj., 5, 5. , 55-58. URL https://moluch.ru/archive/109/26864/ (data obrashcheniya: 07.01.2020).


Review

For citations:


Myrzalyiev B.S., Nursymbat S.S., Amanzhol M. Sustainable development of rural areas is the most important factor in ensuring social security. Economics: the strategy and practice. 2020;15(1):37-52. (In Kazakh)

Views: 493


ISSN 1997-9967 (Print)
ISSN 2663-550X (Online)