Ауыл шаруашылығын және Жерді қашықтықтан зондтауды зерттеудегі еңбекті ғылыми ұйымдастыруды талдау

Научная организация труда приобретает особую актуальность в условиях быстро меняющихся требований современного рынка, особенно в контексте растущего взаимодействия человека с роботизированными системами и искусственным интеллектом. Цель  данного исследования - провести библиометрический и контент-анализ научной организации труда в сельском хозяйстве с акцентом на интеграцию технологий дистанционного зондирования и точного земледелия. Методологическая основа работы включала библиометрический и контент-анализ научных статей, отобранных из базы Web of Science за период 1992–2025 гг., с использованием кластеризации (CiteSpace 6.3.R1). Результаты показали устойчивый рост публикационной активности: с 2017 года число работ увеличилось до 4 в год, а пик цитируемости пришёлся на 2022 г. Кластерный анализ выявил два доминирующих направления: «Индустрия 4.0» (77 статей, средний год публикации – 2016, S = 0.99) и «Прецизионное сельское хозяйство» (34 статьи, средний год – 2014, S = 1.0). Данные кластеры подчеркнули значение технологических достижений в обеспечении устойчивого землепользования и показали, каким образом инновации в сфере прецизионного земледелия изменяют научную организацию труда и управление сельскохозяйственными предприятиями. Результаты демонстрируют рост интереса к проблематике организации труда в условиях цифровизации агросектора, усиление междисциплинарных связей и расширение спектра прикладных исследований. В будущем целесообразно расширять базы данных для анализа, включать больше межсекторных исследований и разрабатывать организационные модели, учитывающие социальные и этические аспекты внедрения новых технологий.

1. Awais, M., Wang, X., Hussain, S., Aziz, F., & Mahmood, M. Q. (2025). Advancing precision agriculture through digital twins and smart farming technologies: A review. AgriEngineering, 7(5), 137 https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering7050137

2. Borchers, M. R., & Bewley, J. M. (2015). An assessment of producer precision dairy farming technology use, prepurchase considerations, and usefulness. Journal of Dairy Science, 98(6), 4198-4205. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-8963

3. Caja, G., Castro-Costa, A., & Knight, C. H. (2016). Engineering to support wellbeing of dairy animals. Journal of Dairy Research, 83(2), 136-147. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022029916000261

4. Chaves, J. V. B., Gutierrez Rosas, C. L., Ferraz, C. P. A., Aiello, L. H. F., Peche Filho, A., Mota, L. T. M., Longo, R. M., & Ribeiro, A. Í. (2025). Soil conservation and information technologies: A literature review. Smart Agricultural Technology, 11, 100935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2025.100935

5. Chen, C., Ibekwe-SanJuan, F., & Hou, J. (2010). The structure and dynamics of cocitation clusters: A multiple-perspective cocitation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61 (7), 1386-1409. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21309

6. Clarivate. (2025). Web of Science reports. Web of Science. Retrieved June 16, 2025 from https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/analyze-results/72b15979-05de-41c0-82c8-8a6bb165be3a-017391787b

7. Colnago, P., Rossing, W. A. H., & Dogliotti, S. (2021). Closing sustainability gaps on family farms: Combining on-farm co-innovation and model-based explorations. Agricultural Systems, 188, 103017 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.103017

8. Driessen, C., & Heutinck, L. F. M. (2014). Cows desiring to be milked? Milking robots and the co-evolution of ethics and technology on Dutch dairy farms. Agriculture and Human Values, 32(1), 3-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-014-9515-5

9. Eastwood, C. R., Chapman, D. F., & Paine, M. S. (2012). Networks of practice for co-construction of agricultural decision support systems: Case studies of precision dairy farms in Australia. Agricultural Systems, 108, 10-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2011.12.005

10. Forclaz, A. R. (2017). Shaping the future of farming: The International Labour Organization and agricultural education, 1920s to 1950s. Agricultural History Review, 65(2), 320-339.

11. Forclaz, A. R. (2019). From reconstruction to development: The early years of the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and the conceptualization of rural welfare, 1945-1955. International History Review, 41(2), 351-371. https://doi.org/10.1080/07075332.2018.147887 3

12. Freidenzon, E.Z. (1968) Scientific organization of labor and related problems. Metallurgist 12, 97-99. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00736871

13. Giller, K. E., Witter, E., Corbeels, M., & Tittonell, P. (2009). Conservation agriculture and smallholder farming in Africa: The heretics’ view. Field Crops Research, 114(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2009.06.017

14. Hammer, W. (1992). 50 Years of Work Science in Agriculture - 1941–1991. Landbauforschung Völkenrode, 42(3), 165-168.

15. Hansen, B. G. (2015). Robotic milking-farmer experiences and adoption rate in Jæren, Norway. Journal of Rural Studies, 41, 109-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.08.004

16. Hermann, M., Pentek, T., & Otto, B. (2016). Design principles for Industrie 4.0 scenarios. In Proceedings of the 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (pp. 3928–3937). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2016.488

17. Hostiou, N., Fagon, J., Chauvat, S., Turlot, A., Kling-Eveillard, F., Boivin, X., & Allain, C. (2017). Impact of precision livestock farming on work and human-animal interactions on dairy farms: A review. Biotechnologie, Agronomie, Société et Environnement, 21(4), 268–275. https://doi.org/10.25518/1780-4507.13706

18. Hostiou, N., Vollet, D., Benoit, M., & Delfosse, C. (2020). Employment and farmers’ work in European ruminant livestock farms: A review. Journal of Rural Studies, 74, 223–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.01.008

19. ILO. (2025). Innovative approaches to formalization in Asia and the Pacific: Background report to ILO Asia and the Pacific tripartite regional knowledge sharing forum (1st ed.). International Labour Organization. https://doi.org/10.54394/XOSQ7112

20. Kouakou, P. A. K. (2023). Impact of local processing of agricultural raw materials on job creation in the West African Monetary and Economic Union. Agricultural and Resource Economics - International Scientific E-Journal, 9(3), 250–265. https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2023.09.03.11

21. Lucas, V., & Gasselin, P. (2022). An intensive and collective style of farm work that enables the agroecological transition: A case study of six French farm machinery cooperatives. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 6, 862779. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2022.862779

22. Malanski, P. D., Dedieu, B., & Schiavi, S. (2021). Mapping the research domains on work in agriculture: A bibliometric review from Scopus database. Journal of Rural Studies, 81, 305–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.10.050

23. Malanski, P. D., Schiavi, S. M. D., & Dedieu, B. (2022). Work in agriculture in the international scientific literature (2010–2019). Cahiers Agricultures, 31, 23. https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2022021

24. Malanski, P. D., Schiavi, S., & Dedieu, B. (2019). Characteristics of “work in agriculture” scientific communities: A bibliometric review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 39(4), 36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-019-0582-2

25. Müller, F., Jaeger, D., & Hanewinkel, M. (2019). Digitization in wood supply: A review on how Industry 4.0 will change the forest value chain. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 162, 206–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2019.04.002

26. Mundigl, S., Blackburn, C., Pinak, M., Colgan, T., Clement, C., Otto, T., Voytchev, M., Niu, S. L., Coates, R., & Le Guen, B. (2021). The Inter-Agency Committee on Radiation Safety—30 years of international coordination of radiation protection and safety matters. Journal of Radiological Protection, 41(4), 1381. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/ac0b4a

27. Pan-Montojo, J., & Mignemi, N. (2017). International organizations and agriculture, 1905 to 1945: Introduction. Agricultural History Review, 65(2), 237-253.

28. Pashkevich, V. A. (2024). Kadrovaya politika Respubliki Belarus’ v sel’skom khozyaistve: Tendentsii, problemy, resheniya [Personnel policy of the Republic of Belarus in agriculture: Trends, problems, solutions]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus. Agrarian Series, 62(3), 183-199. https://doi.org/10.29235/1817-7204-2024-62-3-183-199 (In Russ)

29. Rohozha, M., & Svyaschenko, Z. (2024). Formation of a new model of rational agriculture management by Yevhen Chykalenko. East European Historical Bulletin, 30, 50-59. https://doi.org/10.24919/2519-058X.30.299912

30. Rutten, C. J., Velthuis, A. G. J., Steeneveld, W., & Hogeveen, H. (2013). Invited review: Sensors to support health management on dairy farms. Journal of Dairy Science, 96(4), 1928-1952. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-6107

31. Schewe, R. L., & Stuart, D. (2014). Diversity in agricultural technology adoption: How are automatic milking systems used and to what end? Agriculture and Human Values, 32(2), 199-213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-014-9542-2

32. Sodoma, R., Lesyk, L., Hryshchuk, A., Dubynetska, P., & Shmatkovska, T. (2022). Innovative development of rural territories and agriculture in Ukraine. Scientific Papers - Series Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development, 22(4), 685-696.

33. Svitovyi, O., Kirdan, O., & Gechbaia, B. (2022). Organizational-economic foundations of formation of value added in grain production. Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, 8(3), 200–223. https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2022.08.03.10

34. Taylor, F. W. (1911) The Principles of Scientific Management. New York: Harper & Brothers.

35. van Dijk, F. J., & Moti, S. (2023). A repository for publications on basic occupational health services and similar health care innovations. Safety and Health at Work, 14(1), 50-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2023.01.003

36. Walsh, D., Strandgard, M., & Carter, P. (2014). Evaluation of the Hitman PH330 acoustic assessment system for harvesters. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 29(6), 593-602. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2014.953198

37. Wang, Y., An, J., Shao, M., Wu, J., Zhou, D., Yao, X., Zhang, X., Cao, W., Jiang, C., & Zhu, Y. (2025). A comprehensive review of proximal spectral sensing devices and diagnostic equipment for field crop growth monitoring. Precision Agriculture, 26(3), 54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-025-10251-3

38. Warren, A., Osbahr, H., Batterbury, S., & Chappell, A. (2003). Indigenous views of soil erosion at Fandou Beri, southwestern Niger. Geoderma, 111(3-4), 439-456. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(02)00276-8

39. White, J. C., Coops, N. C., Wulder, M. A., Vastaranta, M., Hilker, T., & Tompalski, P. (2016). Remote sensing technologies for enhancing forest inventories: A review. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 42(5), 619–641. https://doi.org/10.1080/07038992.2016.1207484

40. Wickman, A., Duysen, E., Cheyney, M., Pennington, W., Mazur, J., & Yoder, A. (2021). Development of an educational YouTube channel: A collaboration between US agricultural safety and health centers. Journal of Agromedicine, 26(1), 75-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/1059924X.2020.1845269

41. Yang, L., Lu, B., Schmidt, M., Natesan, S., & McCaffrey, D. (2025). Applications of remote sensing for crop residue cover mapping. Smart Agricultural Technology, 11, 100880 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2025.100880