«ИННОВАЦИЯЛАР ДИФФУЗИЯСЫ, БІЛІМ АҒЫНЫ ЖӘНЕ ЭКОНОМИКАЛЫҚ ӨСУ» ТЕОРИЯЛЫҚ ЖӘНЕ ЭМПИРИКАЛЫҚ МОДЕЛЬДЕРІН ТАЛДАУ
Abstract
The article is devoted to a review of theoretical and empirical studies on the relationship between regional growth and innovation activity.The purpose of the review is to classify approaches to analyzing the relationship between knowledge flows and regional growth, stimulated by the diffusion of innovations.Result. The study confirms the basic premise that innovation activity, recorded in calculations through R & D costs, costs of technological innovation and knowledge transfers, are endogenous factors that can explain differences in economic growth.Conclusions are made about the ability to transfer knowledge to reduce inequality in innovation activity among innovative leaders and lagging behind in innovations. There is a connection between geographical proximity and the ability of both explicit and implicit knowledge to spread. The ability to absorb knowledge from exchange participants is damped inversely with the distance between participants, the efficiency of the flow of knowledge depends on the absorptive capacity of the regions.
About the Authors
L. S. Spankulova
УНИВЕРСИТЕТ НАРХОЗ
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
D. R. Korgasbekov
ИНСТИТУТ ЭКОНОМИКИ КОМИТЕТА НАУКИ МИНИСТЕРСТВО ОБРАЗОВАНИЯ И НАУКИ РК
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
References
1. Hagerstrand T. Innovation diffusion as a spatial process. - Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967. - 350 p.
2. Aghion P., Howitt P. (1994) Growth and Unemployment // The Review of Economic Studies. Vol. 61. № 3. Р. 477-494.
3. Griliches Z. (1979). Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth // The Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1): 92-116 p.
4. McLaurin W. R. (1953). The sequence from invention to innovation and its relation to economic growth// Quarterly Journal of Economics,67: 97-111 p.
5. Rothwell R. (1994). Towards the fifth generation innovation process// International Marketing Review, 11(1): 7-31 p.
6. Giersch H. Aspects of growth, structural change, and employment A schumpeterian perspective // Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv. - 1979. - Т. 115. - №. 4. - С. 629-652 p.
7. Sinergiya prostranstva: regionalnye innovacionnye sistemy, klastery i peretoki znaniya / otv. red. a. n. pilyasov. - Smolensk: ojkumena. - 2012. - 760 s.
8. Tobler W. (1970). A computer movie simulating urban growth in Detroit region// Economic Geography 46: 234-240 p.
9. Rodgriguez-Pose A., Villareal Peralta E.M. (2015). Innovation and regional growth in Mexico: 2000-2010// Growth and Change, 46(2): 172-195 p.
10. Rogers E.M. (1962). Diffusion of innovations, New York: Free Press of Glencoe. 1962. - 367 p.
11. Griliches Z. (1957). Hybrid corn: an exploration in the economics of technological change// Econometrica, 25 (4): 521-522 p.
12. Jaffe A. B. (1986). Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: Evidence from firms’ patents, profit and market share// American Economic Review, 76: 984-1001. 57-1 p.
13. Audretsch D. B., Feldman M.P. (1996). R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production// American Economic Review, 86(4): 253-273 p.
14. Crescenzi R., Rodriguez-Pose A., Stoper M. (2007). The territorial dynamics of innovation: a Europe-United States comparative analysis// Journal of Economic Geography,7(5):673-709 p.
15. Fagerberg J., Schrolec M. (2008). National innovation systems, capabilities and economic development// Research Policy, 37: 1417-1435 p.
16. Statistika nauki i innovacij. kratkij terminologicheskij slovar./ pod. red. l.m. goxberga. - m.: centr issledovanij i statistiki nauki, 1996g. s.30-31
17. Prigozhij a.i. novovvedeniya: stimuly i prepyatstviya (socialnye problemy innovatiki) m.,1989 c. 35-36.
18. Jaffe A. B., Trajtenberg M., Henderson R. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1993. № 108 (3). P. 577-598 p.
19. Marrocu E., Paci R., Usai S. (2013). Proximity, networking and knowledge production in Europe: what lessons for innovation policy? // Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80: 1484-1498 p.
Review
For citations:
Spankulova L.S., Korgasbekov D.R. . Economics: the strategy and practice. 2018;(3):56-63. (In Russ.)
Views: 344
Email this article 