Assessment of the Effectiveness of the European Union Countries Transition to a Circular Economy: Data Envelopment Analysis

In the current era of overconsumption, transition to circular economy is a relevant problem for every country in the world. The main idea behind this economic approach is to break the link between rising wealth and overexploitation of primary natural resources. The article assessed the current and future state of the circular economy’s development in 27 countries of the European Union. The assessment was carried out using Data Envelopment Analysis based on data for 2019 of selected input and output parameters described by the circular economy. Generation of municipal waste per capita, Water exploitation index, Final energy consumption and Social Progress Index were used as input parameters. Circular material use rate and municipal waste recycling rate were output parameters. All data was collected from official reliable sources such as Eurostat, and the Social Progress Imperative website. The study results showed that as of 2019, 40,74% of European countries have high efficiency in the advancement of circular economy, 40,74% - sufficient, 11,11% - medium and 7.41% - low efficiency. However, the analysis showed very good prospects for the future progress of the circular economy in these countries, since the overall efficiency results in the CCR model range from 0.899 to 1 for all countries in the European Union. With the implementation of the New Circular Economy Action Plan, which was adopted in 2020 by the European Commission, the EU countries have the opportunity to fully turn to the circular economy and ensure the healthy, sustainable development of countries.

1. European Commission (2020). Circular Economy Action Plan: for a cleaner and more competitive Europe, 28 p.

2. Pearce, D., Turner, R.K. (1990). Economics of natural resources and the environment. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

3. European Commission (2015). Circular Economy Action Plan.

4. Mhatre, P., Panchal, R., Singh, A., Bibyan, S. (2021). A systematic literature review on the circular economy initiatives in the European Union. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 26, 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.09.008

5. Friant, M.C., Vermeulen, W.J.V., Salomone, R. (2021). Analysing European Union circular economy policies: words versus actions. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 337–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.11.001

6. Hartley, K., van Santen, R., Kirchherr, J. (2020). Policies for transitioning towards a circular economy: Expectations from the European Union (EU). Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 155, 104634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104634

7. Kirchherr, J., Piscicelli, L., Bour, R., KostenseSmit, E., Muller, J., Huibrechtse-Truijens, A., Hekkert, M. (2018). Barriers to the Circular Economy: Evidence From the European Union (EU). Ecological Economics, 150, pp. 264–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.028

8. Momete, D. C. (2020). A unified framework for assessing the readiness of European Union economies to migrate to a circular modelling. Science of The Total Environment, 718, 137375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137375

9. Marco-Fondevila, M., Llena-Macarulla, F., Callao-Gastón, S., Jarne-Jarne, J.I. (2021). Are circular economy policies actually reaching organizations? Evidence from the largest Spanish companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 285, 124858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124858

10. Türkeli, S., Kemp, R., Huang ,B., Bleischwitz, R., McDowall, W. (2018). Circular economy scientific knowledge in the European Union and China: A bibliometric, network and survey analysis (2006–2016). Journal of Cleaner Production, 197(1), 1244–1261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.118

11. Domingues Martinho, V.J.P. (2021). Insights into circular economy indicators: Emphasizing dimensions of sustainability. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 10, 100119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2021.100119

12. Singh, S., Trivedi, D., Dasgupta, M.S., Routroy, S. (2021). A bibliometric analysis of circular economy concept in E-waste research during the period 2008–2020. Materialstoday: proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.03.525

13. Awasthi, A.K., Cucchiella F., D’Adamo, I., Li, J., Rosa, P., Terzi, S., Wei, G., Zeng ,X. (2018). Modelling the correlations of e-waste quantity with economic increase. Science of The Total Environment, 613-614, 46–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.288

14. Hadzic, A., Voca, N., Golubic, S. (2018). Life-cycle assessment of solid-waste management in city of Zagreb, Croatia. The Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 20, 1286–1298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-017-0693-2

15. Martin, M., Wetterlund, E., Hackl, R., Holmgren, K.M., Peck, P. (2017). Assessing the aggregated environmental benefits from by-product and utility synergies in the Swedish biofuel industry. Biofuels, 11(6), 683–698. https://doi.org/10.1080/17597269.2017.1387752

16. Exposito, A., Velasco, F. (2018). Municipal solid-waste recycling market and the European 2020 Horizon Strategy: A regional efficiency analysis in Spain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 938–948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.221

17. Voskamp, I. M., Stremke, S., Spiller, M., Perrotti, D., van der Hoek, J.P., Rijnaarts, H.H.M. (2016). Enhanced performance of the eurostat method for comprehensive assessment of urban metabolism: a material flow analysis of Amsterdam. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(4), 887–902. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12461

18. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8

19. Banker, R.D., Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale efficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078–1093. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078

20. Fan, Y., Fang, C. (2020). Circular economy development in China-current situation, evaluation and policy implications. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 84, 106441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106441

21. European Comission. Eurostat database https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/main/data/database

22. Social Progress Imperative website https://www.socialprogress.org/