Preview

Economics: the strategy and practice

Advanced search

The Impact of Interregional and Country Inequality on the Dynamics of Economic Growth in Kazakhstan

https://doi.org/10.51176/1997-9967-2022-2-6-16

Abstract

   In modern realities, inequality is not only an urgent problem but is quite acutely perceived by society, especially in the post-pandemic period.

   This paper aims to analyze and evaluate the impact of inequality on the economic growth of Kazakhstan. In theoretical and empirical works, there are trends of both positive and negative effects of inequality on the growth of the economies of various countries. The research methodology is based on the development of the concept of interregional and country inequality. Methods such as retrospective analysis, generalization and systematization, comparative analysis, and regression analysis were applied. The information basis of the study was the database files for 16 regions of Kazakhstan and a period of 25 years from 1993 to 2018, available on the website of the Bureau of National Statistics of the Agency for Strategic Planning and Reforms of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Based on the analysis of the calculated inequality coefficients, it was determined that the gap between interregional and country inequality is insignificant. Over 25 years, there has been a considerable increase in interregional and country inequality in Kazakhstan. The econometric analysis confirmed the existence of a significant negative link between inequality and economic growth and a positive relationship between income and GRP. In general, the study’s main hypothesis on the impact of inequality on the dynamics of economic growth in Kazakhstan is confirmed by empirical calculations. Thus, when developing and defining an effective regional policy, it is necessary to take into account the impact of inequality on economic growth, as it is statistically significant.

About the Authors

K. Т. Turkebayeva
Satbayev University
Kazakhstan

Karina Т. Turkebayeva,  Correspondent author, PhD student

050013

22 Satbayev Str.

Almaty

 



C. Wolff
Astana IT University
Kazakhstan

Carsten Wolff,  PhD, professor, Pro-rector for digitalization and international cooperation

010000

55/11 Mangilik El Str.

Nur-Sultan



References

1. Hacibedel, M. B., Mandon, P., Muthoora, M. P. S., & Pouokam, N. (2019). Inequality in good and bad times: A cross-country approach. International Monetary Fund.

2. UNDP, (2019). Urbanization as an Accelerator of Inclusive and Sustainable Development, National Human Development Report, Whiteshield Partners.

3. Stiglitz, J. E. (2012). The price of inequality: How today’s divided society endangers our future. WW Norton & Company.

4. Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. The American economic review, 45 (1), 1-28.

5. Piketty, T. (2013). Capital in the 21st Century. Cambridge, MA: President and Fellows, Harvard College.

6. Panizza, U. (2002). Income inequality and economic growth: Evidence from American data. Journal of Economic Growth, 7 (1), 25-41.

7. Berg, A., Ostry, J. D., Tsangarides, C. G., & Yakhshilikov, Y. (2018). Redistribution, inequality, and growth: new evidence. Journal of Economic Growth, 23 (3), 259-305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-017-9150-2

8. Gutiérrez-Romero, R. (2021). How does inequality affect long-run growth? Cross-industry, cross-country evidence. Economic Modelling, 95, 274-297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2020.11.016

9. Neves, P. C., Afonso, Ó., & Silva, S. T. (2016). A meta-analytic reassessment of the effects of inequality on growth. World Development, 78, 386-400.

10. Erman, L., & te Kaat, D. M. (2019). Inequality and growth: industry-level evidence. Journal of Economic Growth, 24 (3), 283-308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-019-09169-z

11. Alesina, A., & Rodrik, D. (1994). Distributive politics and economic growth. The quarterly journal of economics, 109 (2), 465-490.

12. Perotti, R. (1996). Growth, income distribution, and democracy: What the data say. Journal of Economic growth, 1 (2), 149-187.

13. Keefer, P., & Knack, S. (2002). Polarization, politics and property rights: Links between inequality and growth. Public choice, 111 (1), 127-154.

14. Murphy, K. M., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1989). Industrialization and the big push. Journal of political economy, 97 (5), 1003-1026.

15. Rosenstein-Rodan, P. N. (1943). Problems of industrialisation of eastern and south-eastern Europe. The economic journal, 53 (210/211), 202-211.

16. Galor, O., & Zeira, J. (1993). Income distribution and macroeconomics. The review of economic studies, 60 (1), 35-52.

17. Kaldor, N. (1955). Alternative theories of distribution. The review of economic studies, 23 (2), 83-100.

18. Mirrlees, J. A. (1971). An exploration in the theory of optimum income taxation. The review of economic studies, 38 (2), 175-208.

19. Milanovic B. (2005). Worlds Apart: Measuring International and Global Inequality. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

20. Cingano, F. (2014). Trends in income inequality and its impact on economic growth. Migration Working Papers. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5jxrjncwxv6j-en

21. Bureau of National Statistics (2021). [updated April 19, 2022; cited April 30, 2022]. Available: http://www.stat.gov.kz


Review

For citations:


Turkebayeva K.Т., Wolff C. The Impact of Interregional and Country Inequality on the Dynamics of Economic Growth in Kazakhstan. Economics: the strategy and practice. 2022;17(2):6-16. https://doi.org/10.51176/1997-9967-2022-2-6-16

Views: 600


ISSN 1997-9967 (Print)
ISSN 2663-550X (Online)