Analysis of the Gender Segregation of Labor in Higher Education of Kazakhstan: Regional Aspect

Gender inequality remains a pressing issue in Kazakhstan, with vertical and horizontal segregation resulting in unequal pay and the representation of men and women in different professions. To achieve equal access to labor, social and institutional resources, the state’s economic policy aims to address this problem. Data collected from 2016-2021 from the electronic portal of the Bureau of National Statistics of Kazakhstan showed that women dominate public education schools and higher education institutions. However, there have been minor changes in the percentage of male and female teachers and faculty members. The Duncan index, which measures gender segregation, showed a difference of 17.1 percentage points between the proportion of male and female teachers in general education schools and male and female faculty members in higher education institutions. At the same time, the field of education is one of the lowest paid in Kazakhstan. The article’s main results highlight the unequal opportunities for women compared to men. Occupational segregation can also be geographically considered, taking into account the burden of housekeeping. Rural women experience more occupational discrimination than their urban counterparts. Addressing the gender disparity in higher education faculty is essential to promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion in academia and beyond. Gender equality in higher education is critical for social and economic progress, as research and education are the primary drivers of innovation and development. 

1. Adams, T. L. (2010). Gender and feminization in health care professions. Sociology compass, 4(7), 454-465. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751- 9020.2010.00294.x

2. Ariogul, S., & Can, N. (2010). Teaching is a female profession in the eyes of a beholder” or is it? Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 629- 633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.075

3. Bayuzakova, G. I., & Isakov, K. I. (2019). Gender specifics of the sectoral structure of employment in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Bulletin of the Kyrgyz-Russian Slavic University, 19(7), 19-22.

4. Blickenstaff, С. J. (2005). Women and science careers: leaky pipeline or gender filter? Gender and education, 17(4), 369-386. https://doi. Org/10.1080/09540250500145072

5. Bongco, R. T., & Ancho, I. V. (2020). His Story in the feminized teaching profession in the Philippines. Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia, 19(2), 197-215. https://doi.org/10.17477/ JCEA.2020.19.2.197

6. Bureau of National Statistics (2021). [cited December 30, 2022]. Available: http://www.stat. gov.kz

7. Chernova, J. V. (2012). Balance of family and work: policies and individual strategies of mothers. Journal of Social Policy Research, 10(3), 295- 308.

8. Griffiths, M. (2006). The feminization of teaching and the practice of teaching: Threat or opportunity? Educational Theory, 56(4), 387-405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2006.00234.x

9. Griffiths, P. (2006). Introduction to English semantics and pragmatics. Edinburgh university press. 10. Lahelma, E. (2000). Lack of male teachers: A problem for students or teachers? Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 8 (2), 173 -186. https://doi.org/10.1080/14 681360000200093

10. Lipovka, A. V. (2018). Gender labor segregation in higher education in Kazakhstan. Registration certificate No. 9099-Zh dated 25.03. 2008 issued by the Ministry of Culture and Information of the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Committee for Information and Archives by the Order of the Committee for Control in the Sphere of Education and Science.

11. Jacobi, J. (2000). Modernization Through Feminization? On the History of Women in the Teaching Profession. European Education, 32(4), 55-78. https:// doi.org/10.2753/EUE1056-4934320455

12. Kireyeva, A. A. (2015). Directions for improving gender policy to curb the growth of the gender pay gap. Actual problems of the humanities and natural sciences, 10(2), 41-45.

13. Malanyina, A. A. (2019). Problems of professional segregation in the labor market of Kazakhstan. Economics and Management: Current Trends, 19-23. https://doi.org/10.31483/r-32369

14. Malanyina, A. A. (2019). Gender discrimination in the level of remuneration in the labor market of Kazakhstan. Economics and Entrepreneurship, 1, 358-363.

15. Meurs, M., Nugmanova, M., Salimzhanova, A., & Marvin, S. (2021). Gender Regime and Women’s Employment in Kazakhstan. Comparative Economic Studies, 63(4), 603-622.

16. Mim, S. (2020). Feminization of Teaching in Bangladesh: Exploring the Influence of State, Market, and Family. Journal of Education, Teaching and Learning, 5(1), 1-7.

17. Muzzin, L. J., Brown, G. P., Hornosty, R. W., & Features Submission, H. C. (1994). Consequences of feminization of a profession: the case of Canadian pharmacy. Women & Health, 21(2-3), 39-56. https://doi.org/10.1300/J013v21n02_03

18. Najibi, P., & McLachlan, C. (2023). Moving towards a sustainable future for women in Afghanistan through increased tertiary education participation: challenges and possibilities. Inclusion, Equity, Diversity, and Social Justice in Education: A Critical Exploration of the Sustainable Development Goals, 245-259. https:// doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5008-7_17

19. Spankulova L.S., Chulanova Z.K., & Ibraimova S.Z. (2019). Influence of innovative activity, human capital, knowledge spillovers on regions’s economic growth. Economics: the strategy and practice, 14(4), 53-66.

20. Teasdale, S., McKay, S., Phillimore, J., & Teasdale, N. (2011). Exploring gender and social entrepreneurship: women’s leadership, employment and participation in the third sector and social enterprises. Voluntary sector review, 2(1), 57-76. https:// doi.org/10.1332/204080511X560620

21. Yao, J., Wong, D. W., Bailey, N., & Minton, J. (2019). Spatial segregation measures: A methodological review. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 110(3), 235-250. https://doi.org/10.1111/ tesg.12305