ОСОБЕННОСТИ ОРГАНИЗАЦИОННО-ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКОГО МЕХАНИЗМА СТИМУЛИРОВАНИЯ ПРЕДПРИНИМАТЕЛЬСКОЙ АКТИВНОСТИ В ТУРИЗМЕ
Аннотация
The purpose of the work is to determine the significance and features of the organizational economic mechanism for stimulating entrepreneurial activity in the tourist industry. The paper is a theoretical-empirical study.The article analyzes various points of view to the definition of the concept of «organizational- economic mechanism», identified features and the main elements of the organizational-economic mechanism for stimulating entrepreneurial activity.The result of the research was the development of a model of the organizational-economic mechanism for stimulating entrepreneurial activity in tourism.The field of application of the research results is the activity of the subjects of the tourist industry. The result of the organizational-economic mechanism will be the improvement of the quality of the provided tourist services, stability of demand for tourist services, which will lead to an increase in the share of inbound and domestic tourism in Kazakhstan and as a result of profitability in the industry. The development of the tourist industry will provide jobs, and hence the socio-economic stability in the regions.
Об авторах
А. Т. Тлеубердинова
КАРАГАНДИНСКИЙ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННЫЙ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ ИМ. АКАДЕМИКА Е.А. БУКЕТОВА
Казахстан
Казахстан
Д. М. Салауатова
КАРАГАНДИНСКИЙ ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКИЙ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ КАЗПОТРЕБСОЮЗА
Казахстан
Казахстан
Список литературы
1. Kutran K. Organizational and Economic Arrangements of Economic Systems Management. Revista ESPACIOS. - Vol. 38 (№ 46). - 2017. P. 41.
2. Abalkin L.I. (1980). What is the economic mechanism? Journal of “Mysl”, 80.
3. Belleflamme P. & Peitz M. (2010). Industrial Organization: Markets and Strategies. Cambridge University Press: Summary and Resources
4. Savchenko A.V. & Solovyov V.P. (2013). The essence and components of organizational- economic mechanism of fostering innovation in the enterprise. Electronic scientific specialized edition of “Efficient economy”, 12 [electronic resource]. Access mode : http://www.economy.nayka.com. ua/?op=1&z=2635.
5. Diba M. (2005). Theoretical and methodological foundations of economic regulation in modern economic system. Journal of Economy of Ukraine, 10, 42-48.
6. Vagina E.Y. (1990). Economic Mechanism: problems of the present and the past. Publishing house Znanie, 64.
7. Mookherjee D. & Tsumagari M. (2014). Mechanism Design with Communication Constraints. J. of Pol. Econ.
8. Heyne P., Boettke P.J. & Prychitko D.L. (2014). The Economic Way of Thinking. (13th ed.). Pearson, 130-132.
9. Bergek A., Jacobsson S., Carlsson B., Lindmark S. & Rickne, A. (2008) Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis, Research Policy, 37, 407-429.
10. Haken H., & Portugali J. (2014). Information Adaptation: The Interplay Between Shannon Information and Semantic Information in Cognition. Heidelberg, etc.: Springer.
11. Feldman M.S. & Orlikowski W.J., 2011. Theorizing Practice and Practicing Theory. In:Organization Science, 22(5), 1240-1253.
12. Shkolny O.O. (2007). Organizational and economic arrangement of competitiveness management of agrarian enterprises (monograph). Uman: Uman State Agrarian University Publishing, 308.
13. Ferreira M.A.M. & Filipe J.A. (2012). A Stochastic Model in Assessing Resources Dynamics Study. Journal of Applied Management and Investments, 1(4), 388-392.
14. Galaty M.L., Parkinson W.A., Pullen D.J. & R.M. Seifried (2014). Mycenaean-scapes: geography, political economy, and the Eastern Mediterranean world-system 449-459. In G. Touchais, R. Laffineur and F. Rougemont (eds), L’environnement naturel et la relation homme- milieu dans le monde Egéen protohistorique, Actes de la 14e Rencontre Egéenneinternationale, Paris, Institut National d’Histoire de l’Art (INHA), 11-14 décembre 2012. Peeters: Leuven, Liège.
15. Owens J. (2013). As-Is and To-Be Process Modeling: a Flawed and Failed Paradigm. White paper. UK: Orbus.
16. Bakasv A.A. (2003). Economic modeling of socio-economic systems: Collection of Scientific Works, 7, 158.
17. Veer M., Tuunter E. (2005). Rural tourism in Europe, An exploration of success and failure factors. Hague: Stichting Recreatie.
18. Making Tourism more sustainable. A Guide for Policy Makers. www.world.tourism. org
19. Закон Республики Казахстан от 13 июня 2001 года, № 211-II, «О туристской деятельности в Республике Казахстан», https:// online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=1023618
20. Закон Республики Казахстан от 11 января 2007 года, № 214-III,«О лицензировании» (с изменениями и дополнениями). https:// online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=30087221
21. http://www.kaztour-association.com/
22. http://kagir.kz/
23. https://assotsiatsiya-po-razvitiyu- vnutrennego-turizma-v.satu.kz/
24. http://atameken.kz/kk/
25. https://kapital.kz/gosudarstvo/61558/v- kazahstane-sozdana-nackompaniya-kazah-turizm. html
26. http://www.fondkamkor.kz/index.html
27. https://damu.kz/
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Тлеубердинова А.Т., Салауатова Д.М. ОСОБЕННОСТИ ОРГАНИЗАЦИОННО-ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКОГО МЕХАНИЗМА СТИМУЛИРОВАНИЯ ПРЕДПРИНИМАТЕЛЬСКОЙ АКТИВНОСТИ В ТУРИЗМЕ. Economics: the strategy and practice. 2018;(1):52-65.
Просмотров: 274
Послать статью по эл. почте 